CNN NO CHARGES against Hilary email server!

olive · #1 07-02-2016, 10:32 PM

http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/07/hillar...-headquarters/

becca · #2 07-02-2016, 10:38 PM

Now how could that possibly be when there are so many websites telling us how she's even killed people! Oh and that psychic Donald Trump always knows all of course.

olive · #3 07-02-2016, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by becca

Now how could that possibly be when there are so many websites telling us how she's even killed people! Oh and that psychic Donald Trump always knows all of course.

Robert Sobel
Published on02/07/2016
ROBERT SOBEL Expert in NewsFollow 2 votesHILLARY CLINTON WILL NOT BE CHARGED OVER PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER, DONALD TRUMP FLIPS, REPORT

http://us.blastingnews.com/news/2016...-00996463.html

Macfanforever · #4 07-02-2016, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by becca

Now how could that possibly be when there are so many websites telling us how she's even killed people! Oh and that psychic Donald Trump always knows all of course.

They are FOS.left wing corrupt media like Clinton News Network "CNN" and others along with the corrupt system.They go in hand like best friends.No its not DT because this crap has been going on for years with her.I like to know more about what was up with that secret airport meetup with her hubby and Mrs Lynch was about.Something smells fishy there.It was more then talking about his grand kids.

BombaySapphire3 · #5 07-03-2016, 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macfanforever

They are FOS.left wing corrupt media like Clinton News Network "CNN" and others along with the corrupt system.They go in hand like best friends.No its not DT because this crap has been going on for years with her.I like to know more about what was up with that secret airport meetup with her hubby and Mrs Lynch was about.Something smells fishy there.It was more then talking about his grand kids.

The Clintons are crooked and Trump is a crazy orange clown..I'm voting Green this year.

**mylittledemon** · #6 07-03-2016, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

The Clintons are crooked and Trump is a crazy orange clown..I'm voting Green this year.

Macfanforever · #7 07-03-2016, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

The Clintons are crooked and Trump is a crazy orange clown..I'm voting Green this year.

Hahahahaha.That made me LOL..

Everybody is so wound up over these two before these conventions even started.Anything could happen. Trump can get tossed out because of his mouth and more crap probably show up on Hillary.Also they have not mention who their VP's will be which could effect their voters choice in Nov.Mrs Palin turned me off on Mr McCain in 2008. Hillary and The Donald will be outside looking in and there could be a new set of candidates we dont know about when November comes around.We be all voting Green in November which I dont mind doing.

estranged4life · #8 07-03-2016, 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

The Clintons are crooked and Trump is a crazy orange clown..I'm voting Green this year.

about HITLER-y's connection to Tyson Foods and the ILLEGAL dumping of raw product into a tributary that contaminated the Illinois River here in NE Oklahoma - I could and will NEVER trust a politician in regards to environmental issues...As the Cherokee's like to say (Which I am a tribal member) "The only green these pseudo-environmentalists care about is the green in ones BANK account".

Anyways, Ray Charles' ghost said he saw that coming, the whole "No charges" malarkay...

When are the citizens of this country going to take control back from the Clintons/Bushes/Trumps of the world? Damn shame that so many highly intelligent people buy into their B.S. and give them the power to become elected officials...smh.

BombaySapphire3 · #9 07-03-2016, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by estranged4life

about HITLER-y's connection to Tyson Foods and the ILLEGAL dumping of raw product into a tributary that contaminated the Illinois River here in NE Oklahoma - I could and will NEVER trust a politician in regards to environmental issues...As the Cherokee's like to say (Which I am a tribal member) "The only green these pseudo-environmentalists care about is the green in ones BANK account".

Anyways, Ray Charles' ghost said he saw that coming, the whole "No charges" malarkay...

When are the citizens of this country going to take control back from the Clintons/Bushes/Trumps of the world? Damn shame that so many highly intelligent people buy into their B.S. and give them the power to become elected officials...smh.

How is the Green party responsible for a polluted river in Oklahoma which has been run by Republicans for decades now

welcomechris · #10 07-03-2016, 10:01 AM

she just had her interview yesterday.

if she isn't charged for this, it's gonna be the biggest scandal is OJ

Macfan4life · #11 07-03-2016, 01:05 PM

Of course there wont be any charges. But it has nothing to do about conspiracy theories. Lets look at facts and not through a political lens.

Why do politicians or government officials use private email? The answer is to hide something. They communicate one way in their official email and another way in a private email.
Clintion's private email at state was something like HRClinton@____
Hardly a way to hide something right? If you are going to hide your private email then why is your name in it. In addition Clinton did not have 2, 3 or more emails. She exclusively used one private email during her tenure at state. This would have easily been proven otherwise if just one email showed up with a different address.

So far State has supported Clinton's claim that no top secret documents were sent or received. That is probably a good thing because no top secret document should be emailed anywhere no matter from what server. There are ways to deal with classified and top secret documents rather than email.

Other secretaries of state have used private emails for official business purposes.

What is reported is a few emails of ALL the emails Clinton sent and received wont be released. Why? Because State says there are sensitive/secret emails on her server. However, Clinton did not send or receive them that way. How is that a crime? If I send someone an email and somehow they attach things to the email that I did not, how is that a crime. Lets take a criminal act. The email I sent was forwarded several times. At some point in the chain, someone attaches child pornography to the email. Should I be charged with a crime? I never sent or received the child pornography and I never had intent to do so.
Pure politics. No one would expect to live under those circumstances for themselves.

For all the conspiracy theorists. What is the crime? Every email on her server has been scrutinized by State, DOJ, and the FBI. If Clinton sent classified information via her private email she should be charged. State has already stated no one hacked into the server. But so far no evidence what so ever. Its a scary world we live in when politics blinds people's ability to look at facts. Bad judgment, yes. Crime, no. Unless something new has been discovered (which is possible) then there is nothing to support criminal charges. Period.
I think some of you guys watch way too much Fox News. Bill Clinton chased the attorney general around in a plane and finally got to her in Phoenix where he pressured her to not charge Hillary. Ha ha ha. I live in realville and investigate the facts before forming an opinion. Don't let the talking heads on TV fill your head with mush.
Its laughable when I hear on TV or Fox News the comparison to General Petraeus. General Petraeus PURPOSELY met a woman and PURPOSELY gave her classified information. His mistress had no reason to have such information. Still waiting for the same talking heads to explain what classified information did Clinton give to someone who was not authorized to receive it. Even if her email was hacked (which so far hasn't been) its not the same analogy. It would be sloppy Clinton who unknowingly let hackers see such information. How would that be the same for someone who met someone in a parking lot to purposely give them classified information. No fair comparison, right? But you NEVER hear ANYONE counter such a ridiculous comparison on TV. Petraeus committed a crime definitely and was charged. If you never send or receive classified information, how is that a crime? If someone attaches classified information to an email that you sent over 8 senders ago, why should you be charged? If proven by the FBI that no hackers hacked your email and no classified information was compromised, how is that a crime?
Clearly some want charges only because of there political beliefs. That is what they do in Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea. We are better than that.
If proven by the FBI that hackers obtained classified information or Clinton sent or received classified information via private server then she should be charged. That is unlikely from what we know so far.

Macfanforever · #12 07-03-2016, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macfan4life

Of course there wont be any charges. But it has nothing to do about conspiracy theories. Lets look at facts and not through a political lens.

Why do politicians or government officials use private email? The answer is to hide something. They communicate one way in their official email and another way in a private email.
Clintion's private email at state was something like HRClinton@____
Hardly a way to hide something right? If you are going to hide your private email then why is your name in it. In addition Clinton did not have 2, 3 or more emails. She exclusively used one private email during her tenure at state. This would have easily been proven otherwise if just one email showed up with a different address.

So far State has supported Clinton's claim that no top secret documents were sent or received. That is probably a good thing because no top secret document should be emailed anywhere no matter from what server. There are ways to deal with classified and top secret documents rather than email.

Other secretaries of state have used private emails for official business purposes.

What is reported is a few emails of ALL the emails Clinton sent and received wont be released. Why? Because State says there are sensitive/secret emails on her server. However, Clinton did not send or receive them that way. How is that a crime? If I send someone an email and somehow they attach things to the email that I did not, how is that a crime. Lets take a criminal act. The email I sent was forwarded several times. At some point in the chain, someone attaches child pornography to the email. Should I be charged with a crime? I never sent or received the child pornography and I never had intent to do so.
Pure politics. No one would expect to live under those circumstances for themselves.

For all the conspiracy theorists. What is the crime? Every email on her server has been scrutinized by State, DOJ, and the FBI. If Clinton sent classified information via her private email she should be charged. State has already stated no one hacked into the server. But so far no evidence what so ever. Its a scary world we live in when politics blinds people's ability to look at facts. Bad judgment, yes. Crime, no. Unless something new has been discovered (which is possible) then there is nothing to support criminal charges. Period.
I think some of you guys watch way too much Fox News. Bill Clinton chased the attorney general around in a plane and finally got to her in Phoenix where he pressured her to not charge Hillary. Ha ha ha. I live in realville and investigate the facts before forming an opinion. Don't let the talking heads on TV fill your head with mush.
Its laughable when I hear on TV or Fox News the comparison to General Petraeus. General Petraeus PURPOSELY met a woman and PURPOSELY gave her classified information. His mistress had no reason to have such information. Still waiting for the same talking heads to explain what classified information did Clinton give to someone who was not authorized to receive it. Even if her email was hacked (which so far hasn't been) its not the same analogy. It would be sloppy Clinton who unknowingly let hackers see such information. How would that be the same for someone who met someone in a parking lot to purposely give them classified information. No fair comparison, right? But you NEVER hear ANYONE counter such a ridiculous comparison on TV. Petraeus committed a crime definitely and was charged. If you never send or receive classified information, how is that a crime? If someone attaches classified information to an email that you sent over 8 senders ago, why should you be charged? If proven by the FBI that no hackers hacked your email and no classified information was compromised, how is that a crime?
Clearly some want charges only because of there political beliefs. That is what they do in Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea. We are better than that.
If proven by the FBI that hackers obtained classified information or Clinton sent or received classified information via private server then she should be charged. That is unlikely from what we know so far.

For you Hillary lovers.No I dont watch flux news. Coverups everywhere .Sorry. Its still FOS and I dont buy it and trust her to even run a ice cream stand.Plus make Mr Nixon's issues look like nothing compared the crap here and stuff we dont know about

Macfanforever · #13 07-03-2016, 08:13 PM

For the conspiracy theorist .Heres the great Alex Jones.More and more what this guys says is true.

Macfan4life · #14 07-03-2016, 08:22 PM

Yes infowars and Alex Jones The United States government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and the school shooting in CT was a government conspiracy to take away guns. Those are 2 of the more sane conspiracy theories of Alex Jones. He also believes Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK, the government bombed the Boston marathon, and the government purposely poisons its citizens.
I don't call that conspiracy theories. I call that mental illness.

Macfanforever · #15 07-03-2016, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macfan4life

Yes infowars and Alex Jones The United States government orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and the school shooting in CT was a government conspiracy to take away guns. Those are 2 of the more sane conspiracy theories of Alex Jones. He also believes Ted Cruz's dad killed JFK and the government purposely poisons its citizens.
I don't call that conspiracy theories. I call that mental illness.

I'm here in CT and Newtown is about 30 minutes away from here and it was the real thing so its BS on that topic.The 911 story is a good question.The JFK thing was a shock and who knows on that.