TMI thread. Discussion of sensitive ADULT issues/triggers. Enter with awareness!

[markolas]

Originally Posted by HejiraNYC

Well, at least a jock is proximal to the "standard" sex organ on a man... but feet are just... kind of there. It has no (direct) sexual/reproductive function for a man or a woman, so, again, it's just a bit baffling to me.

Lips, hands, and eyes don't have any direct sexual or reproductive function either, but they can be sexually attractive features, nonetheless. But I think stuff like this sort of defies explanation. If you're not into it, you're not into it.

And I still think jock straps look ridiculous. Especially in a porn when the guy is on all fours, wearing one while he's getting plowed. Why don't they just draw a face on his butt with lipstick? It wouldn't look any less silly.

Then there's that whole tanline thing. A guy will have an even tan everywhere, but his @$$ is pasty white. It's gross.