
11-20-2011, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,934
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elle
this doesn't really make any sense to me. he was puffed up in 1997 when he was 48 and in the 80s when he was barely 30. he is NOT puffed up now when he's 62.
so where is this logic coming from? do all people after certain age have arthritis? after witnessing Lindsey over and over as being in great physical shape why is it so hard to believe that he just might be in great physical shape?  i mean, although he definitely seems to have the energy and stamina of people half his age, he wouldn't be the only 62 yo without arthritis and keeping in shape, would he?
|
I don't think arthritis is synonymous with age at all. I mean, I'm 23 and I have it in my thumbs and toes. Granted, I'm a painter which would probably account for the thumbs in some small way. But toes? That's just nature being difficult lol.
__________________
You were the only audience I ever needed.
|