The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
View Poll Results: Bailout, For it or Against it?
Yes, I support it as it stands now 2 22.22%
No, I do not support it 7 77.78%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2008, 12:20 PM
GoS's Avatar
GoS GoS is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reveille Hill
Posts: 661
Default Where Do You Stand on the Bailout?

The Ledge seems to be a very balanced place, politically. So what do you guys think?
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 09-26-2008, 12:26 PM
ajmccarrell ajmccarrell is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoS View Post
The Ledge seems to be a very balanced place, politically. So what do you guys think?
I don't know about balanced, I think I'm the only R here!

I don't support it. I think it will fall very short and allow for more corruption and is just an incentive for more business as usual. I also think it will snowball the problem and we'll have a bigger problem down the line. I think the government should take over the investments and broker asset purchases and make up the difference in equity, much the the FDIC might with deposits. As far as the mortgages go or the MBOs, the market should do the rest and we may have a couple of very bad years. However, IMO, it is better than a long and painful depression that lasts for a decade or more.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2008, 12:37 PM
Musicman408's Avatar
Musicman408 Musicman408 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Somewhere out In The Back Of Your Mind, KY
Posts: 5,519
Default

Not in favor of where it stands now.
__________________
New Song, "What Love Is"- Check it Out!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-26-2008, 03:05 PM
GoS's Avatar
GoS GoS is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reveille Hill
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmccarrell View Post
I don't know about balanced, I think I'm the only R here!

I don't support it. I think it will fall very short and allow for more corruption and is just an incentive for more business as usual. I also think it will snowball the problem and we'll have a bigger problem down the line. I think the government should take over the investments and broker asset purchases and make up the difference in equity, much the the FDIC might with deposits. As far as the mortgages go or the MBOs, the market should do the rest and we may have a couple of very bad years. However, IMO, it is better than a long and painful depression that lasts for a decade or more.
I didn't mean balanced in quantity, I meant in debating abilty! If there is a reasonable debate going on, you take on four or so people and hold your ground.

Don't worry I have a conservative friend (4gigs) who should start posting as soon as his account gets activated, he'll help you out I bet!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-26-2008, 03:25 PM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 15,185
Default

I don't support this damn bailout.

And what's upsetting me even more in the past day or two is the mumble among the irresponsible segment of homeowners (you can read their comments on various forums & news sites) that now THEY want individual bailouts.

If there's anything I would want to do LESS than bail out a Broad Street investment corporation, it's bail out any of my stupid, irresponsible fellow Americans who bought homes with no-interest loans or no money down & whose incomes couldn't even come CLOSE to keeping up with their mortgages.

Irresponsible dumb****s, all of 'em.
__________________

moviekinks.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-26-2008, 03:30 PM
GoS's Avatar
GoS GoS is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reveille Hill
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David View Post
I don't support this damn bailout.

And what's upsetting me even more in the past day or two is the mumble among the irresponsible segment of homeowners (you can read their comments on various forums & news sites) that now THEY want individual bailouts.

If there's anything I would want to do LESS than bail out a Broad Street investment corporation, it's bail out any of my stupid, irresponsible fellow Americans who bought homes with no-interest loans or no money down & whose incomes couldn't even come CLOSE to keeping up with their mortgages.

Irresponsible dumb****s, all of 'em.
I think it is the mortgage lenders' fault. They lied to and misled many innocent people to get them into this mess.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2008, 03:56 PM
ajmccarrell ajmccarrell is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoS View Post
I think it is the mortgage lenders' fault. They lied to and misled many innocent people to get them into this mess.
True, but people who can't budget also signed on the dotted line. I almost bought a house from one of these shady guys a year ago, the difference is that I said no to the pack of goods he was selling me. He wasn't following the laws regarding good faith estimates, but had I signed I also would be responsible because I didn't push him to provide backup for his loan. I took this guy on referral from a friend, yada yada.

We have a lot of people in this country who have no idea what they can really afford and want to buy things out of their price range. For example, I just sold a car. It was a 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS. It was heavily modded, but I decided I needed to grow up and save on the car payment and buy a more adult car. You wouldn't believe how many half-price offers I got, or how many unemployed people wanted to make payments, etc. There were a ton of people who were getting loans but hadn't started the process, but wanted to fill out a bill of sale, etc. The problem is that as Americans, our purchasing habits are basically stupid. Just as these people wanted to buy a car out of their reach, lots of people were more than willing to sign up for the snake oil loans at teaser rates, figuring that they would never have to pay up eventually. Those people DO deserve to lose their homes and it was the bank's fault for lending to people who had no business buying homes, or for buying homes that were out of their league.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2008, 06:38 AM
Zombie's Avatar
Zombie Zombie is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Glass Walls of Limbo
Posts: 1,622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmccarrell View Post
True, but people who can't budget also signed on the dotted line. I almost bought a house from one of these shady guys a year ago, the difference is that I said no to the pack of goods he was selling me. He wasn't following the laws regarding good faith estimates, but had I signed I also would be responsible because I didn't push him to provide backup for his loan. I took this guy on referral from a friend, yada yada.

We have a lot of people in this country who have no idea what they can really afford and want to buy things out of their price range. For example, I just sold a car. It was a 2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS. It was heavily modded, but I decided I needed to grow up and save on the car payment and buy a more adult car. You wouldn't believe how many half-price offers I got, or how many unemployed people wanted to make payments, etc. There were a ton of people who were getting loans but hadn't started the process, but wanted to fill out a bill of sale, etc. The problem is that as Americans, our purchasing habits are basically stupid. Just as these people wanted to buy a car out of their reach, lots of people were more than willing to sign up for the snake oil loans at teaser rates, figuring that they would never have to pay up eventually. Those people DO deserve to lose their homes and it was the bank's fault for lending to people who had no business buying homes, or for buying homes that were out of their league.
Agreed. I have a decent income for a family the size of mine, but I know damn well I can't comfortably afford a mortgage like I've seen many people around me go after - people who make way less than I do. I don't even have a credit card, and if I ever did end up getting one, I'd lock it away somewhere. If I don't have the cash to buy something when I want to buy it, I just don't.

I think our stupid spending habits stem from a strange sense of entitlement - well, of COURSE I deserve a 4 bedroom house on my McDonald's paycheck. Of COURSE I deserve ajmccarrell's fancy car (which I imagine you yourself worked hard for, since you strike me as that sort of dude) even though I'm unemployed and can't make rent anyway. Of COURSE. I'm a good person, and people like me, dammit. I deserve fancy things I can't afford, and then when that goes pear-shaped, I will blame everyone else for it, because my sense of entitlement does not leave any room for personal responsibility.

The shady lenders are to blame for part of this, to be sure, but it's also the fault of all of the people that took out these loans with no hope of ever being able to pay for them. After all, a shady lender can't lend enough shady money to get us where we are now to NO ONE. Someone had to take the shady loan. And a ****ton of someones did.

Now we're here looking into the abyss and I am watching people shrieking about the "bailout," but I'm not convinced they understand exactly what's going on here anyway. I haven't heard anyone coming up with a better solution, and I'm not sure they could if they even knew how to go about it - if you're not bright enough to grasp the idea that you shouldn't buy more house than you can afford, I'm not sure you're bright enough to grasp the totality of the ramifications of what you and thousands of your counterparts have cheerfully marched us into.

I can't say I agree or disagree with the bailout, because I haven't even seen the language yet, but I can tell you I'd love to follow around behind the local news cameras that are asking the opinions of people on the street, and each time someone says, "NO! IT'S HORRIBLE!" I'd like to say, "Okay, now you're in control - tell me what you'd do to fix it" and see how many actually have a feasible solution of their own.

Wow, I'm annoyed. Does it show?
__________________
Malanderer, Badlander and Thief, Est. 1982

All the same, baby. All the same.

"You never know what I'll do. I've resequenced my show. I'm a master at sequencing. I'm the one who sequenced for Fleetwood Mac. I sequenced 'Rumours.' Everyone loves my sequences. They're fun.''
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW picture

Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW

$17.40



Fleetwood Mac - Alternate Collection (6 CD Box) New Sealed CD picture

Fleetwood Mac - Alternate Collection (6 CD Box) New Sealed CD

$46.99



Fleetwood Mac Greatest Hits Deluxe Edition Sea Blue Vinyl 2 LP picture

Fleetwood Mac Greatest Hits Deluxe Edition Sea Blue Vinyl 2 LP

$35.73



Fleetwood Mac The Alternate Collection 8LP Vinyl Box Set Sealed RSD 2022 Limited picture

Fleetwood Mac The Alternate Collection 8LP Vinyl Box Set Sealed RSD 2022 Limited

$180.00



Fleetwood Mac The Very Best of Fleetwood Mac 2CD 2002 Rhino R2 73775 picture

Fleetwood Mac The Very Best of Fleetwood Mac 2CD 2002 Rhino R2 73775

$9.50




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved