The Royal Wedding: William and Catherine, April 29th, 2011 - Page 3

Silver Springs · #31 04-29-2011, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CreepingDeath

Now, now. The real tragedy in all this is William's hairline. He used to be so cute. Now it looks like my avatar.

As I said before, it's down to poor genetics lol. I suppose that means Harry's safe from them then, hehe.

CreepingDeath · #32 04-29-2011, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

As I said before, it's down to poor genetics lol. I suppose that means Harry's safe from them then, hehe.

Ha. Yes, the little Hewitt boy looked just fine today. I'm still contemplating having a royal bastard with him.

Silver Springs · #33 04-29-2011, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CreepingDeath

Ha. Yes, the little Hewitt boy looked just fine today. I'm still contemplating having a royal bastard with him.

Well you're welcome to him. Personally I never understood the appeal of the boys in that respect. Though I do find it quite hilarious how William was once considered the looker of the family. And then Charles' glorious genetics kicked in

CreepingDeath · #34 04-29-2011, 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

Well you're welcome to him. Personally I never understood the appeal of the boys in that respect. Though I do find it quite hilarious how William was once considered the looker of the family. And then Charles' glorious genetics kicked in

I just think Harry would be loads of fun to be around. It would totally bring out all of my awful tendencies, though. I'd be in the Betty Ford Clinic by the next day.

McTrouble · #35 04-29-2011, 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CreepingDeath

Ugh, I can't believe Camilla was on the balcony. What a slap to Princess Diana to have that cow up there during her son's wedding.

However, both William and Harry are extremely fond of her and accepted her from very early on and that's all that matters. If Diana's sons have love and affection for Camilla then she's OK by me.

Fleetwoodmark · #36 04-29-2011, 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

Now would we call it an attack? Or use the correct term of "response to a comment you made with my own opinion", as most discussion are borne from. If you don't want people to comment on what you've said, don't say anything. It's just that simple. And I love how you keep saying my opinions are based on false information just because you dont agree with me. I'd love to have a debate with you about religion

. Oh, just a question while it's still in my head. If you don't care what I think, why are you persistently riled up enough to respond?

You seriously must have a chip on your shoulder to have the response you have, are you jealous of it or what ? Is optimism a little too much to ask for ?

Your opinion is based on false information as you have shown little knowledge of William's life which has tainted your view of him.

McTrouble · #37 04-29-2011, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CreepingDeath

Now, now. The real tragedy in all this is William's hairline. He used to be so cute. Now it looks like my avatar.

Oh no, not the hairline again - how many times have we discussed LB's?

CreepingDeath · #38 04-29-2011, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McTrouble

Oh no, not the hairline again - how many times have we discussed LB's?

But Lindsey is in his 60s. Wills is only 28. Damn Charles, and those awful genes.

Fleetwoodmark · #39 04-29-2011, 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CreepingDeath

But Lindsey is in his 60s. Wills is only 28. Damn Charles, and those awful genes.

You say bad genes - The Queen is 85 and looks fantastic and is still super fit. Prince Phillip is 90, looks great and stands straighter than most 60 year olds. Both perfectly healthy. No bad in my opinion.

Silver Springs · #40 04-29-2011, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fleetwoodmark

You seriously must have a chip on your shoulder to have the response you have, are you jealous of it or what ? Is optimism a little too much to ask for ?

Your opinion is based on false information as you have shown little knowledge of William's life which has tainted your view of him.

Excuse me? So now I have a chip on my shoulder because I don't agree with you? Is that what you're telling me? Well excuse me for having an opinion that differs from yours. Excuse me for not reeling out irrelevant pieces of information to please you. I have my opinion and I stick by it. I respect that you have your own opinion, despite the fact that you clearly have no respect for any opinion that differs from your own. But you're not going to change my mind by getting personal.

Fleetwoodmark · #41 04-29-2011, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

Excuse me? So now I have a chip on my shoulder because I don't agree with you? Is that what you're telling me? Well excuse me for having an opinion that differs from yours. Excuse me for not reeling out irrelevant pieces of information to please you. I have my opinion and I stick by it. I respect that you have your own opinion, despite the fact that you clearly have no respect for any opinion that differs from your own. But you're not going to change my mind by getting personal.

Your negativity to the whole situation is overwhelming. Most people will be happy for them but there is always one.

Silver Springs · #42 04-29-2011, 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fleetwoodmark

Your negativity to the whole situation is overwhelming. Most people will be happy for them but there is always one.

Did you not read any of my posts? I stated quite plainly in a few of them that I was happy for them. Do you just get off on arguing without reading replies? You must do as I have yet to get a reply from you that broaches all of the points I raise and question you upon.

Fleetwoodmark · #43 04-29-2011, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

Did you not read any of my posts? I stated quite plainly in a few of them that I was happy for them. Do you just get off on arguing without reading replies? You must do as I have yet to get a reply from you that broaches all of the points I raise and question you upon.

Your questions are irrelevant and only there to deflect my critiscism of your attitude problem.

Silver Springs · #44 04-29-2011, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fleetwoodmark

Your questions are irrelevant and only there to deflect my critiscism of your attitude problem.

And your avoidance is irrelevant and only there to deflect my questioning your own problem.

Fleetwoodmark · #45 04-29-2011, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Silver Springs

And your avoidance is irrelevant and only there to deflect my questioning your own problem.

That reply confirms the fact that you need to cheer up and get a life.

I posted to congratulate the couple, I wasn't looking for an argument but you obviously were. Why the hell can't you just appreciate the country you live in and the heritage we have. Thats why an estimated 2 billion people were tuning into the Royal wedding. As I said they are a beautiful couple who signify hope over adversity. It's just a shame you find yourself on the wrong side of the argument.