The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Lindsey Buckingham
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:30 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default Oprah Comment (Two Years Later . . .)

Hey Dee,

Did you notice that when Oprah was doing the introductory voiceover for Stevie she said of Lindsey that the two "fell in love" two years after they met, when Stevie was 17?

Did Oprah's staff get their facts wrong?

Michele
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 04-14-2011, 07:35 PM
CADreaming's Avatar
CADreaming CADreaming is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
Hey Dee,

Did you notice that when Oprah was doing the introductory voiceover for Stevie she said of Lindsey that the two "fell in love" two years after they met, when Stevie was 17?

Did Oprah's staff get their facts wrong?

Michele
ROFLOL! Of course, I noticed! And... I don't think so!

Those wacky kids...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-14-2011, 08:21 PM
WildHearted's Avatar
WildHearted WildHearted is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
Hey Dee,

Did you notice that when Oprah was doing the introductory voiceover for Stevie she said of Lindsey that the two "fell in love" two years after they met, when Stevie was 17?

Did Oprah's staff get their facts wrong?

Michele
Stevie herself said in an interview not too long ago, "This is the man that I met and fell in love with when I was 17."

However, to me it sounded like Oprah was saying that Stevie met Lindsey when she was 17, and two years later they fell in love. Which actually still contradicts a few of the things they've said in the past about them not getting together until they left Fritz to go on their own... which tbh I've never really believed completely.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2011, 08:31 PM
CADreaming's Avatar
CADreaming CADreaming is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildHearted View Post
Stevie herself said in an interview not too long ago, "This is the man that I met and fell in love with when I was 17."

However, to me it sounded like Oprah was saying that Stevie met Lindsey when she was 17, and two years later they fell in love. Which actually still contradicts a few of the things they've said in the past about them not getting together until they left Fritz to go on their own... which tbh I've never really believed completely.
Well, there's no way that's true if she's living with him a la "Gypsy" (yes, I'm bringing that up again!) in a house in Los Gatos in 1969...

But, it does seem they've backed up the time frame a little more in recent years. I think Javier even said he didn't know why they kept saying they weren't together until Fritz broke up.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2011, 08:49 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Javier said they used to share a room during Fritz and were always backing each other up in band discussions (which is something they never did again ever).

But Stevie said that it was because they had to tell the Fritz guys that they were ditching them that they suddenly became romantic with each other -- for comfort.

It was always funny to me, because Stevie said Lindsey was offered a recording contract and the record company knew he wouldn't take it without her, so the record company only wanted the 2 of them and not the other guys and they had to break up with Fritz and I was thinking, "well, if she was only a friend, why wouldn't he accept a recording contract without her? Why didn't he say, 'I refuse to do it, without Javier!'"

Yes, she may have recently changed the time line, but I don't know if that's the truth finally coming out, or if it's just senility.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:08 PM
WildHearted's Avatar
WildHearted WildHearted is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
Javier said they used to share a room during Fritz and were always backing each other up in band discussions (which is something they never did again ever).

But Stevie said that it was because they had to tell the Fritz guys that they were ditching them that they suddenly became romantic with each other -- for comfort.

It was always funny to me, because Stevie said Lindsey was offered a recording contract and the record company knew he wouldn't take it without her, so the record company only wanted the 2 of them and not the other guys and they had to break up with Fritz and I was thinking, "well, if she was only a friend, why wouldn't he accept a recording contract without her? Why didn't he say, 'I refuse to do it, without Javier!'"

Yes, she may have recently changed the time line, but I don't know if that's the truth finally coming out, or if it's just senility.

Michele

I also recall Stevie saying that the reason they got romantic was because "It was just so cool" that they had gotten singled out and broken up the band....

And yeah, the comment about Lindsey not leaving Fritz without her totally doesn't make sense either. I thought the same thing.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2011, 09:25 PM
CADreaming's Avatar
CADreaming CADreaming is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
Javier said they used to share a room during Fritz and were always backing each other up in band discussions (which is something they never did again ever).

But Stevie said that it was because they had to tell the Fritz guys that they were ditching them that they suddenly became romantic with each other -- for comfort.

It was always funny to me, because Stevie said Lindsey was offered a recording contract and the record company knew he wouldn't take it without her, so the record company only wanted the 2 of them and not the other guys and they had to break up with Fritz and I was thinking, "well, if she was only a friend, why wouldn't he accept a recording contract without her? Why didn't he say, 'I refuse to do it, without Javier!'"

Yes, she may have recently changed the time line, but I don't know if that's the truth finally coming out, or if it's just senility.

Michele
Yeah, I hear ya...but why were they a-hem "shacking up"? I don't think she's lying about that because she was specific enough to say for that entire tour where their house was... unless it was just her house and he happened to be over there just hanging out, working on music with her, plotting ways they could undermine Javier's destiny and take over the music world as Buckingham Nicks...

Idk, it just makes more sense to me that they had a relationship or were in a relationship during the Fritz years at least. But, hell they can't even get the break up year right either! So...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2011, 11:11 PM
Tango Tango is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,928
Default

I'll say this about the Oprah thing-- I personally thought it was a pretty lousy thing to say anything about "the boys of the band" and "hookers" on national TV on a show like Oprah's while the 2 women of the band were living the lives of sequestered nuns.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2011, 11:41 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tango View Post
I'll say this about the Oprah thing-- I personally thought it was a pretty lousy thing to say anything about "the boys of the band" and "hookers" on national TV on a show like Oprah's while the 2 women of the band were living the lives of sequestered nuns.
Oh, she's insane, but on the other hand, the men might have been more embarassed if Stevie had said that THEY were cloistered, kept under heavy guard and never slept with a hooker or groupie. How are you going to look Mick Jagger in the eye, if you don't have that street cred?

Sorry for the double standard.

The funny thing is Stevie implied that she and Christine were together in a guarded room -- reading Louisa May Alcott, I imagine.

Other than Sausalito, I highly doubt that Stevie and Christine were keeping each other company in the evenings.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2011, 09:35 AM
Tango Tango is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,928
Default




I guess time makes you bolder. Maybe that's how things started with the Fleetwood Mac "Rumours" generation. Later, at least one of the sisters was involved with Dennis Wilson (who had picked up a venereal disease from one of the Manson sisters); when you sleep with someone, you sleep with their history. I'm sure they all used protection. Even the hookers. ALL of them. Rock & Roll, baby. Kind of creepy: all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-15-2011, 10:46 AM
Kena's Avatar
Kena Kena is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: In your dreams
Posts: 374
Default

I should probably double check the timeline of things before I post this ...but where Stevie and Linds "technically" single during the Fritz days? When did they break up with their others? Stevie said she went out with David Young for 5 years starting when? I remember reading somewhere that Lindsey was dating some girl that he was very serious about and that everyone assumed he would marry...then Stevie came along. I think Stevies timeline is off a bit because they were cheaterheads.
__________________

He asked me for my love
And that was all
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-15-2011, 01:41 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kena View Post
I think Stevies timeline is off a bit because they were cheaterheads.
That makes sense, but by the time Stevie told the story, it was over 5 years later when they started becoming famous. She and Lindsey were both with other people, but they were never married to those people and I don't think they ever even got to the point of living with the other people (at least Stevie says Lindsey never lived with anyone but his parents).

Are you still worried about protecting someone's feelings all that time later, especially when you were never even married to them and you were in your late teens and very early twenties, a time when monogamy isn't prized. I can see not wanting to hurt your old boyfriend or girlfriend right after you break up, but not 5 years later.

I don't think they've told the exact truth, but I really can't figure out what they're lying about. Unless they murdered someone back then and are covering their tracks!

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-15-2011, 02:05 PM
Spoinny Spoinny is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 322
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
That makes sense, but by the time Stevie told the story, it was over 5 years later when they started becoming famous. She and Lindsey were both with other people, but they were never married to those people and I don't think they ever even got to the point of living with the other people (at least Stevie says Lindsey never lived with anyone but his parents).

Are you still worried about protecting someone's feelings all that time later, especially when you were never even married to them and you were in your late teens and very early twenties, a time when monogamy isn't prized. I can see not wanting to hurt your old boyfriend or girlfriend right after you break up, but not 5 years later.

I don't think they've told the exact truth, but I really can't figure out what they're lying about. Unless they murdered someone back then and are covering their tracks!

Michele

Me and my friend have always joked over the past few years how Stevie's stories seem to change or get altered everytime she tells them! I wonder if it's a memory thing or a selective memory thing?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-17-2011, 04:38 AM
jellyman10's Avatar
jellyman10 jellyman10 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post

I don't think they've told the exact truth, but I really can't figure out what they're lying about. Unless they murdered someone back then and are covering their tracks!
I've always had a hunch that Stevie deceived her parents about what (who) she was doing and that she and LB agreed to shuffle dates around to match whatever she told them. And then, as time has gone on, her dad passed on, she gets older and the fibs get more tedious to keep up. So the truth starts to leak out but, as the saying goes, a really good liar needs a really good memory. So now, it's all a huge muddle, and even she can't remember what really happened when any more?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2011, 01:51 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jellyman10 View Post
I've always had a hunch that Stevie deceived her parents about what (who) she was doing and that she and LB agreed to shuffle dates around to match whatever she told them. And then, as time has gone on, her dad passed on, she gets older and the fibs get more tedious to keep up. So the truth starts to leak out but, as the saying goes, a really good liar needs a really good memory. So now, it's all a huge muddle, and even she can't remember what really happened when any more?
Yeah, that's logical. There are some things my dad still didn't know decades after the fact. I took them to his grave!

Wouldn't have had any student debt at all, if I'd used the money he'd given me on TUITION instead of travel.

Michele
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++ picture

Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++

$11.99



BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+)

$5.00



BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF-TITLED) - 1980 COLUMBIA VINYL RECORD - (VG/VG) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF-TITLED) - 1980 COLUMBIA VINYL RECORD - (VG/VG)

$4.50



BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF- TITLED) - 1979 POLYDOR RECORDS PROMO VINYL LP - (VG/VG) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF- TITLED) - 1979 POLYDOR RECORDS PROMO VINYL LP - (VG/VG)

$5.50



Billy Burnette - Try Me Vinyl LP MCA-27114 (1985, MCA / Curb Records) SEALED picture

Billy Burnette - Try Me Vinyl LP MCA-27114 (1985, MCA / Curb Records) SEALED

$9.88




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved