Dave mentions Stevie's "forthcoming album" in new Billboard article

[CADreaming]

Originally Posted by HejiraNYC

Well, the reason I still think Stevie and Dave make a cuter couple (marriage being what it is...) because they are age and musically compatible. I could picture them up in their log cabin retreat with Dave strumming an acoustic guitar on the porch while Stevie sings through the kitchen window. Stevie is a lovely gal, no matter what her age, and chemistry is chemistry. I think they are compatible on many different levels.

Yes, Dave's wife is lovely, but she definitely strikes me as being a bit of a trophy. In other words, if Dave Stewart wasn't half of the Eurythmics, would he have been able to hit that?

Probably not...but then again no accounting for taste, is there.

Dave and Stevie may be "compatible", but their compatibility as far as we know, is strictly professional.

EDIT: You know this topic does make me wonder.... we always hear how the guy dumps the older gal for the younger gal, but what are the statistics on it being the other way around??? Rock stars cheating or dumping young hot wives for the older, more mature woman who "understands".... curious....

[HejiraNYC]

Originally Posted by CADreaming

Probably not...but then again no accounting for taste, is there.

Indeed, as evidenced by the existence of Bekka Bramlett fans.

[elle]

Originally Posted by michelej1

Does Lindsey have any hobbies? Other than pot?

wasn't he somewhat of a movie buff? remember indie vs Ridley Scott film comment?

[CADreaming]

Originally Posted by HejiraNYC

Indeed, as evidenced by the existence of Bekka Bramlett fans.

Ouch!

[elle]

can't believe nobody commented on this speculation from eurythmics site yet:
"Fleetwood Mac meets Eurythmics meets Smashing Pumpkins?! – Sounds like a supergroup already."

... and everybody keeps going on and on about various coupling possibilities no wonder that S&L still hold hands on the stage to make people happy

[louielouie2000]

Originally Posted by sorcerer999

Sigh...no, honey. No.

You are advocating once again for no speculation or opinion to be shared, but instead for this board to solely include dissemination of proven fact. This is no official band/artist sanctioned website... so discussion of opinions, speculations, and hopes are expected and are part of the very fabric of this board. Yes, the Ledge is probably the single best source of information for all things Mac, but it's also an informal place for discussion and fellowship. I don't take kindly at ALL to people suggesting we censor any of that.

[David]

I say we spread all sorts of phony stuff about Fleetwood Mac!
I've been doing it for years.

[PenguinHead]

Originally Posted by louielouie2000

^Anyone else smell the distinct musk of Fleetwood Mac?

My nose is very musky! That's exactly what I thought (or smelled) when I read it. ( funny thing...that musk smells just like pot)

[SapphireSister]

I love my Ledgie-poos, smelly or not. Just thought I'd share .

[Hawkeye]

Am I the only one who isn't fooled into thinking we should all be so gratful to Dave Stewart. It really is one of the biggest illusions I've ever seen. Every f**king twitter update we get from him gives us NOTHING, but incredibly vague info. Every piece of useful information has come elsewhere. Stevie herself has shed the most light by her few interviews at the time of her mini tour. She gave us ACTUAL info on song titles, possible release date number of songs etc. MICK just informed us that Fleetwood Mac isnt touring in 2011. David Wild tells us there's blood on the tracks and again uses song titles.

These people rarely open their mouths but when they do it matters. Dave Stewart is on Twitter many times a day, and instead of actual bones, he has cryptic messages and taunts us with ****. Really we have like 30 tweets worth of updates from him with no useful information, again given by him. And the best thing he did that I am actaully greatful for is he provided an audio sample, BUT at the same time the sample sucked. Now it has actually been growing on me, but could he not have came up with some other 40 second clip that was more WOW inducing. Could there be a more plain clip. So the best thing he did actually has worried a majority of us as opposed to excited us.

I admit to almost fallen for this elaborte illusion that Dave Stewart has done so much for us Stevie fans, but think about it. He's given us so much "NOTHING" while Stevie has given so little but made it count.

[APerfectLie]

Originally Posted by Hawkeye

Am I the only one who isn't fooled into thinking we should all be so gratful to Dave Stewart. It really is one of the biggest illusions I've ever seen. Every f**king twitter update we get from him gives us NOTHING, but incredibly vague info. Every piece of useful information has come elsewhere. Stevie herself has shed the most light by her few interviews at the time of her mini tour. She gave us ACTUAL info on song titles, possible release date number of songs etc. MICK just informed us that Fleetwood Mac isnt touring in 2011. David Wild tells us there's blood on the tracks and again uses song titles.

These people rarely open their mouths but when they do it matters. Dave Stewart is on Twitter many times a day, and instead of actual bones, he has cryptic messages and taunts us with ****. Really we have like 30 tweets worth of updates from him with no useful information, again given by him. And the best thing he did that I am actaully greatful for is he provided an audio sample, BUT at the same time the sample sucked. Now it has actually been growing on me, but could he not have came up with some other 40 second clip that was more WOW inducing. Could there be a more plain clip. So the best thing he did actually has worried a majority of us as opposed to excited us.

I admit to almost fallen for this elaborte illusion that Dave Stewart has done so much for us Stevie fans, but think about it. He's given us so much "NOTHING" while Stevie has given so little but made it count.

I agree and disagree on some parts. Dave has given us the audio clip of everybody loves you and an audio update from him and Stevie. He was also the first to say anything about them working together and that they were making an album. He also is the first to mention the documentary and has shared several new photos with us. I think Dave has given us several substantial bits of info, but compared to the number of useless things he has said, he does give us more fluff than anything. As to the audio clip of Everybody Loves You. This was posted March 5, and seeing as they only started working together in late February, it isn't shocking to me that they didn't have another 40 second clip. I think ELY was the first song they really did and he liked it and wanted to give the fans something, so he did. Then as time progressed, they had more songs that really took off, but Stevie was probably terribly possessive of them and now Warner Bros. probably does not allow Dave to leak such clips. Also, it is a Stevie Nicks solo album, whatever information about the album that comes out should be from her and her label, not necessarily her producer. Dave does have some right to provide such info, but I think he is afraid to give away too much for fear it may piss Stevie off or may violate some terms of a contract.

[SapphireSister]

Honesty, I'm too tired and lazy to read your whole posts at this point but I think I'm along the right lines....

Yes, I'm grateful that DS has brought Stevie out of the depths of hell and back into the artiste we all know she is but am I glad it's him? Not necessarily because I have a feeling (as I've mentioned many times before) I'm not going to like what he's done with her! His whole production and sound, it's not to my liking thus far. Make sense?

[SapphireSister]

Originally Posted by APerfectLie

I agree and disagree on some parts. Dave has given us the audio clip of everybody loves you and an audio update from him and Stevie. He was also the first to say anything about them working together and that they were making an album. He also is the first to mention the documentary and has shared several new photos with us. I think Dave has given us several substantial bits of info, but compared to the number of useless things he has said, he does give us more fluff than anything. As to the audio clip of Everybody Loves You. This was posted March 5, and seeing as they only started working together in late February, it isn't shocking to me that they didn't have another 40 second clip. I think ELY was the first song they really did and he liked it and wanted to give the fans something, so he did. Then as time progressed, they had more songs that really took off, but Stevie was probably terribly possessive of them and now Warner Bros. probably does not allow Dave to leak such clips. Also, it is a Stevie Nicks solo album, whatever information about the album that comes out should be from her and her label, not necessarily her producer. Dave does have some right to provide such info, but I think he is afraid to give away too much for fear it may piss Stevie off or may violate some terms of a contract.

Shouldn't you be in bed, LITTLE BOY??

[APerfectLie]

Originally Posted by SapphireSister

Shouldn't you be in bed, LITTLE BOY??

I should be, but I am afraid of the dark! The monsters under my bed are going to get me

[mitzo]

The only thing that concerns me about the collaboration is that Dave's own songs from his new album are to my ears dull as dishwater in terms of writing and production. I hope Stevie hasn't been made into something like that, is all.