The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 12-04-2010, 10:14 AM
HejiraNYC's Avatar
HejiraNYC HejiraNYC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikolaj View Post
I may exceed my record of 'delete' posts. Forgiving sorts, I know exist here may need to- and any with no interest in politics, please spare yourselves. Ledge mega-minds, I know I'm in over my head, but I just felt like asking about something other than favorite album covers, though that is fun. I know my few strengths, and politics isn't one. I nearly function there, if at all.
I lied, when I said I was swearing off long Ledge writings. I once wrote I don't lie, but I am a liar. Didn't mean to lie. Now 39 hours with no sleep- not intentional debauchery, but a malfunction, with a feverish little mind not shutting up for one second, even. 40 hours now that I'm spell-checking.
At times, wiser, more informed people here write about politics, and I try to improve my mind and read it all. I feel unqualified, I am very late to the game, my Prague origin shouldn't matter, but I have used as an exuse- I am an American, and have been uninformed politically for too long. Ideas and ideals exist under the surface, and I am thinking a lot of racism, sexism, elitism, and rich democratic soapboxing that is every bit 'Republican' as the Republican party itself.
I think of my half-Japanese nephews, their father's pride in 2008 showing his and my sister's sons how much progress the US has made by himself and other forward thinking Americans of mixed cultural backgrounds electing Obama, and wonder, what about Hilary Clinton?
I can't structure this well - Was thinking- was a nation lead astray by one Oprah Winfrey, who somehow had the power, influence, and millions of her billions of dollars to back Obama-- first by cornering the housewife market, and by having a built in black vote support and using her celebrity to all but promise people progress was being made by this man she showcased as someone almost supernaturally possessed of the need to be elected? No right thinking American could not vote for him was the way I viewed the program I saw of OW endorsing him when Hilary was the expected candidate.
What the hell, when in fact, it seems now very possible that someone so lacking in qualification was elected President because of a powerful black woman who could affect the media in methods more far-reaching than most people would assume- There is a reason that 'ET' and other news magazines have adopted the nickname 'Lady O' for Oprah-it's like she doesn't want any woman to achieve as much as she has, so she stopped Hilary because race balance is more important to her than women because she as a woman has 'got hers' but as a black person she knows her race has been shortchanged, and electing a somewhat black man would somehow show progress more important by using a 'black man' more than one, particularly more qualified white woman? I am asking.
The powerful, billionaire OW used every method she had to help displace the front runner Hilary Clinton- who was very qualified and seemed, for a time, to be on the fast track to be the first female American president. Important to a nation, important to women's equality, but not as important as race to OW because she maybe didn't want a woman with qualification to surpass her own 'most powerful woman in the US' status? Why would that be so? Why has she published at least 6 years of a magazine with her photo on the cover every damned month? I know O is a major philanthropic force and I am sure she does far more good than bad.
But did OW promote a 'black' man raised by white parents, pass him off as black, appeal to 'white guilt' we have (Thank God this is a Fleetwood Mac forum, I would feel very bad if many black people were to read it) and keep the qualified white woman out of office?
Not that I dislike the President. I don't understand how someone 2 or 3 years older than me can be president, however!
Internationally with his recent and unprecedented Asian and Indian blunders with more than hints that a US President appeared racist and arrogant while in countries the US was on good terms with, isn't it time to say Americans voted Obama president out of guilt at the horrible injustices black Americans have faced since forever?
Now, of course, life has not changed one bit since his election- not the economy, minority rights, health insurance issues, the ridiculous war?
I just wonder, is something more cynical or glossed-over going on right now, more so than in the last Bush administration? Or is it the same? I feel like Hilary Clinton would have said the right things in Asia and India, done something about health insurance for Americans without it and especially for education.
Why did she- and the country get screwed over for Obama? A nice man, but was it realistic that he (or maybe anyone?) could clean up the last 8 years before he got into office.
I am aware many Americans felt that Hilary had skeletons in her closet regarding financial dealings, but would she have been good for the country in 2008 in a way that Obama isn't?
I hope I don't seem racist myself, by criticizing Oprah's motives or bringing up the not important comment that Obama had white parents who raised him. I don't think of myself as racist, there are multiple races in my own family. I certainly don't think a white woman equals a better President based on white and woman, than black and man.
Well, I just felt like stretching myself a little here, you know, before I turn 100.
Wow... that was... long...

The short answer to your answer is "yes." It is really difficult to imagine how a white man with Obama's credentials and brain could rise to such power so quickly- from a junior senator (who did not even finish a first term) to becoming the most powerful man in the world. It really was a total social movement that not even Oprah could have affected- Obama was the right "type" of person in the right place at the right time with the right message. There would be no President Obama if the country had not been pillaged and trashed by the Dubyah administration. Obama symbolized the populist rebellion against everything Bush and the Republicans stood for at the time. He was a 180-degree divergence from the status quo- not only was he not white, he came from humble beginnings, yet he was the smartest guy in the room- Ivy League educated- and he spoke with a resonance that left people like Bush, McCain and Palin sounding like fumphering idiots. His quasi-socialist tones also resonated deeply with the limousine liberals- the wealthy and white media elite who somehow felt that electing a black president with a social agenda would somehow help to assuage their own self-hatred about being white, rich and powerful. Unfortunately for Hillary, even as a woman, she represented the status quo- a rich, older, white D.C. insider who was seen as riding the coattails of her husband. And ultimately she was race-baited and gender-baited and she took the bait, much to her own detriment. She came off as shrill and weak when she was under fire.

I think it's a shame that Obama has been so ineffective as president. But I think a lot of it is out of his control. The very presence of this intelligent, well-spoken black man with a message of compassion and hope just did not sit will with the nutty fringe who started the Tea Party. And unfortunately, I think this will be the legacy of Obama- partisan politics taken to the umpteenth level. Yes, Obama did not help matters by steamrolling over the Republicans in congress repeatedly. But they did not exactly greet him with open arms either. The Tea Party has managed to coalesce every disgusting, putrid element of American society today under a single monolothic banner: evangelical Christians, racists, anti-intellectuals, gun owners, homophobes, conservatives, Sarah Palin, etc. As an assorted faction of wacky individual causes, they really had limited ability to sway the course of politics. But the nutjobs have unified and are actually now starting to have an affect. Rand Paul, anyone? This is what scares me more than anything in America today. We are basically at a standoff until either Obama leaves office after his first term (likely, unfortunately ) or the American public wisens up and stops voting against their own self interests (not likely). Oh, America...
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE picture

BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE

$49.99



NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett picture

NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett

$7.49



Bekka Bramlett

Bekka Bramlett "I Got News For You" CD In Mint. Shongaloo Records LLC 1707. 2009

$45.00



RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10 picture

RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10

$69.99



BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE picture

BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE

$49.75




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved