The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Stevie Nicks
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2010, 08:15 AM
vivfox's Avatar
vivfox vivfox is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,022
Default The Epistemology Of Stevie Nicks

For today I wanted to have an elaboration of yesterday’s post. I wanted to have something about the nature of art and some measure for assessing value. Some way to speak to or about the complaint some people make about some art and entertainment being dubious. Yesterday’s post included a quote from an art critic who labeled Karen Kilimnik’s work as “feeble.”

I don’t have that post but I have a couple of Stevie Nicks stories that touch on this issue.

All my life, the best musicians I’ve known have been jazz musicians.

The second-best guitar player I’ve ever known had a collection of bootleg tapes of bad performances by famous musicians. He traded these with friends. It is a hobby shared by a lot of people in the entertainment business. One of his favorite tapes was Stevie Nicks recorded live singing something during one of the bad stretches in her life and without audio processing of any kind on her voice. It was pretty horrible. It sounded like some hoodlums had chained up an old drunk behind a car and were dragging her along an alley and she was screaming in pain as her bones cracked.

But no matter how many musicians I’ve heard laugh uproariously at this tape, every musician I talked to still did covers of one or two Stevie Nicks songs and every musician—although sometimes grudgingly and only in private—would admit that they still liked some of her songs and still enjoyed hearing her sing when she could keep her voice together.

I knew a woman who was an aspiring jazz singer. One evening she asked me if I ever heard of Stevie Nicks and I said I had heard of her. My friend said a lot of people at her shows had been requesting a Stevie Nicks song called “Rhiannon” and she asked me if I’d heard it. I said I had heard it. “My bass player taught it to me,” my friend said. “He did an arrangement for us. Do you know that song is just two ****ing chords?” I nodded. I said, “Yeah, but it’s a good song.” My friend looked at me and just like in an espionage movie her eyes narrowed. “It’s just two ****ing chords,” she said. “We rehearse songs that take us hours to get right. And people are requesting this stupid Stevie Nicks **** with two ****ing chords. Are people ****ing retards?” I said, “Well, you know, you can use more than two chords if you want to. When I play it I harmonize the whole bass run kind of.” “Yeah,” my friend said, “but the whole song is still just two ****ing chords. What the ****?” But she performed the song. And even though her band never took the trouble to make a cool arrangement of the song, every performance I saw the audience loved it. My friend never would admit—even grudgingly and in private—that a two-chord song could be a great song.

One time I played a song I wrote that mentioned Stevie Nicks for a young woman. The song included these lyrics:

What if tomorrow morning
Everyone in the world
Dressed like Stevie Nicks
That would be cool

The young woman had never heard of Stevie Nicks. And the aesthetic issues of dressing like Stevie Nicks had never made the transition from women of my generation to the younger set. I’d hoped to springboard from talking about dressing like Stevie to talking about writing songs like Stevie to get a feel for what the next generation would be thinking about two-chord songs but I never got the chance.

I bet that art critic who doesn’t like Karen Kilimnik doesn’t like Stevie Nicks, either. Maybe she never even heard of Stevie Nicks.

She’d still look cool if she dressed like Stevie Nicks.

That says something about the power of art. Even “feeble” [?] art.

http://impossiblekisses.blogspot.com...vie-nicks.html
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 07-02-2010, 09:23 AM
GypsyBlueEyes's Avatar
GypsyBlueEyes GypsyBlueEyes is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 553
Default

When you start talking about giving art some sort of universal value things get a little complicated. Everyone has their own ideas about what actually constitutes "art" and the level of significance that it has. The level of significance I give something I consider art is based on how it makes me feel...which is why I'm so drawn to music...especially lyrics...I absolutely love lyrics. The reason those people who laughed at that one particular demo yet still admitted to listening to some of her other stuff and liking it is because they were aware that you can't place a value on art based on one piece of it. They may not have even realized it but there was something in those songs of Stevie's that they did like and did listen to that had some sort of affect on them. That jazz singer chick who couldn't get over the fact that Rhiannon was only two chords is the perfect example of the snobbery some people exude when it comes to art. She considered it an inferior piece of music and beneath her simply because it only had two chords...who says that something has to be complicated to worth something??? That is so annoying!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2010, 10:19 AM
Christopher's Avatar
Christopher Christopher is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,076
Default

Well for starters a lot of the great old rock n roll songs are 3 chord wonders, The early Beatle's catalogue is littered with them. Tom Petty boasts about 3 chord songs, and a good deal of his early and latter stuff are just a few chords i.e. "Free Falling". The Byrds & the Doors ("Riders On The Storm", "Light My Fire" "Mr Tambourine Man, etc.) have some great 3-4 chord songs. Kurt Cobain wrote some great chord lite material, and lastly Blues music is typically a 3 - 4 chord shuffle, and I could go on and on and on..

So to GASP, OMG "the song (Rhiannon) is just 2 ****ing chords" (while it's really a 3 chord classic rock song; Am-F & C) is musical & artistic grandiosity and perhaps this pathological narcissist "aspiring jazz singer" should not perform any piece of music that she deems below her own greatness!! If she were aware that the purpose, or even better, intent behind Stevie's classic 3 chord wonder's ala "Rhiannon" or "Dreams" that drives & endears them is age old passion. And that perhaps, is what I argue is one of the essential ingredients that comprise a great song or piece of art from being mediocre and stoic. The delivery and the passion are the mortar and bricks filling in the blank skeletal structure.

Last edited by Christopher; 07-02-2010 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2010, 11:32 AM
LikeAWillow's Avatar
LikeAWillow LikeAWillow is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the stillness. Remembering.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Rhiannon is also composed almost entirely of one syllable words except for the title....and that's what makes it brilliant.

[/English Major]
__________________
I never was there
Was there when it counts
I get my way
You're so like me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-02-2010, 02:01 PM
Nikolaj Nikolaj is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,035
Default

I knew a woman who was an aspiring jazz singer. One evening she asked me if I ever heard of Stevie Nicks and I said I had heard of her. My friend said a lot of people at her shows had been requesting a Stevie Nicks song called “Rhiannon” and she asked me if I’d heard it. I said I had heard it. “My bass player taught it to me,” my friend said. “He did an arrangement for us. Do you know that song is just two ****ing chords?” I nodded. I said, “Yeah, but it’s a good song.” My friend looked at me and just like in an espionage movie her eyes narrowed. “It’s just two ****ing chords,” she said. “We rehearse songs that take us hours to get right. And people are requesting this stupid Stevie Nicks **** with two ****ing chords>>
--from the interesting piece Viv found and shared---

She was also a particularly bitter aspiring jazz singer, I'd say.
It was an interesting article, but kind of funny that some nameless aspiring jazz-singer's opinion might matter to anyone!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-02-2010, 02:11 PM
Sanne2's Avatar
Sanne2 Sanne2 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,149
Default

Hold on, lemme Google "epistemology" first.....
__________________

“Remember, in the grand scheme of things, what we do for a living is not very important. After all, we’re not curing cancer here.” - John McVie
http://goldduststevie.tumblr.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-02-2010, 02:13 PM
Nikolaj Nikolaj is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,035
Default

This piece also reminds me of a quote from Stevie circa 1983, I believe it is still on the NicksFix in the 'Articles' archive, I think it was from an interview in 'Arizona Woman' where the writer mentioned to Stevie that while she was hugely successful, some people took a joy of sort in dismissing her songs, and her. Her answer, I think, is part of what has made her endure:
"Those people, I don't care if they live or die," said Stevie in '83.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-02-2010, 02:59 PM
Ghost_Tracker Ghost_Tracker is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,622
Default

I just want to make a point about something called "the Western Canon" - it's the so-called "eat your vegetables" stuff in literature - the books that you "must" read - YOU know, Hamlet, Dickens, Utopia, Plato, that sorta stuff, the whole "dead white guy" thing. The thing is - - As many members here have discovered - some of it really is DAMN good. And if you know a little of the history of it, some of it like Shakespeare was SCANDALOUS. Shakespeare was a freaking ROCK star!!! And how Jonathan Swift stayed out of jail is just absolutely beyond me. But once art gets that label - "this you MUST read, this you MUST see, this you MUST hear" - - Then it's "dead-in-the-water" with a lot of people, especially the young. I'm not saying there's any real possiblilty that could happen with Stevie, but I think it wouldn't be a great thing if it even started to move in that direction. She's (i.m.o.) sort of a "rebel" by nature - people should be listening to her music when the teacher ain't lookin', not being told by the teacher "Okay now if you will please all turn your CD players to song number 35!...."
__________________
So if the ghosts are gone then doesn't that mean I'm kinda screwed??
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-02-2010, 03:16 PM
chiliD's Avatar
chiliD chiliD is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the backseat of a Studebaker
Posts: 9,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher View Post
So to GASP, OMG the song (Rhiannon) is just 2 chords (while it's really a 3 chord classic rock song; Am-F-C)
BUT, the chords only appear two at a time...Am-F, Am-F, C-F, C-F.....it doesn't go through an entire 3 chord progression. Which even "Dreams" does for the little guitar break, but basically is just Fmaj7 - G (repeat as nauseum). But, I'm wondering if this "aspiring jazz singer" wasn't confusing "Rhiannon" with "Dreams".
__________________
Among God's creations, two, the dog and the guitar, have taken all the sizes and all the shapes in order not to be separated from the man.---Andres Segovia
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2010, 04:12 PM
Christopher's Avatar
Christopher Christopher is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,076
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chiliD View Post
BUT, the chords only appear two at a time...Am-F, Am-F, C-F, C-F.....it doesn't go through an entire 3 chord progression. Which even "Dreams" does for the little guitar break, but basically is just Fmaj7 - G (repeat as nauseum). But, I'm wondering if this "aspiring jazz singer" wasn't confusing "Rhiannon" with "Dreams".
I hear ya, but to be fair the "aspiring jazz singer" is quoted as saying "Do you know that song is just two ****ing chords?” not "Do you know that song is just two ****ing chord progressions?”
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-02-2010, 10:02 PM
gypsy4life gypsy4life is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ...in the crystaline knowledge of you...
Posts: 886
Default

I can't help it...everytime I see this thread I read "The Episiotomy of Stevie Nicks"
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2010, 01:01 AM
Stevie's~Prince's Avatar
Stevie's~Prince Stevie's~Prince is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsy4life View Post
I can't help it...everytime I see this thread I read "The Episiotomy of Stevie Nicks"
OW!! If only that ever happened... lol.. but still i was in shock to read that..
__________________
Life gave me you; the change was made
And there's no beginning over
You are not happy, but what is love?
Hate gave you me for a lover...
And if you go forward, I'll meet you there
And if you climb up through the cold freezing air
Look down below you; search out above
And cry out to life for a frozen love
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-04-2010, 10:41 AM
KateTheCursed KateTheCursed is offline
Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 97
Default

Writing a really good 2-3 chord song is like a writing a good haiku. It takes talent & craft to work within such limited confines.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


BILLY BURNETTE  45 RPM Promo Record

BILLY BURNETTE 45 RPM Promo Record "SHOO-BE-DOO" 1978 Rock Unplayed MINT

$6.70



Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12

Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12" Columbia LP + Lyrics VG+

$4.50



BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+)

$5.00



BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF- TITLED) - 1979 POLYDOR RECORDS PROMO VINYL LP - (VG/VG) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF- TITLED) - 1979 POLYDOR RECORDS PROMO VINYL LP - (VG/VG)

$5.50



Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++ picture

Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++

$11.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved