The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Stevie Nicks
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-31-2009, 02:36 PM
LikeAWillow's Avatar
LikeAWillow LikeAWillow is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the stillness. Remembering.
Posts: 2,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacMan View Post
Well, you actually asked the question - "When was it ever on the market?"

Anyway... The word was likely thrown out there that she was interested in selling if there were any takers, at the time - Dec, 2007.

Here's the Real Estate blog that initially posted about the house being on the market.

Realestalker
That.house.is.beautiful. Dani, let's buy it and live like the sisters in Practical Magic. I shouldn't be allowed to post whilst on pain meds.

I HATE WISDOM TEETH.
__________________
I never was there
Was there when it counts
I get my way
You're so like me
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:02 PM
louielouie2000's Avatar
louielouie2000 louielouie2000 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nailatixela View Post
You're missing my point, louie. I'm just trying to say she is not selling the Palisades house at the moment. I don't have to be an exclusive real estate agent to know this - I just read this line of the article:

“I’m keeping my big house because I have my pianos, I can record there, but I really live in a very small, albeit very beautiful place. I’m looking straight at the ocean right now and I just love it."

All I was saying what just that she still ownes the place, and from these words we know it isn't on the market at the moment.
I got your point perfectly. I remembered that the house was on the market at one point. And for all we know, it STILL might be. That's what my whole diatribe about exclusive listings was about. We should all know that what comes out of Ms Nicks mouth can't always be believed, and is often exaggerated or stretched. She could still have the place on the market, and just be trying to find some use for it in the meantime as a place to do interviews/photo shoots/and record. I suspect in this market, she has pulled up the for sale sign tho... I don't imagine too many $14million places are changing hands right now!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:04 PM
louielouie2000's Avatar
louielouie2000 louielouie2000 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacMan View Post
Well, you actually asked the question - "When was it ever on the market?"

Anyway... The word was likely thrown out there that she was interested in selling if there were any takers, at the time - Dec, 2007.

Here's the Real Estate blog that initially posted about the house being on the market.

Realestalker
I love how she thinks her 3,000+ square foot ocean front condo is "very small." My condo isn't even a third that size... the woman has probably had bigger closets than my whole place!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-31-2009, 04:06 PM
nailatixela's Avatar
nailatixela nailatixela is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: a cage without a key
Posts: 1,811
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
I got your point perfectly. I remembered that the house was on the market at one point. And for all we know, it STILL might be. That's what my whole diatribe about exclusive listings was about. We should all know that what comes out of Ms Nicks mouth can't always be believed, and is often exaggerated or stretched. She could still have the place on the market, and just be trying to find some use for it in the meantime as a place to do interviews/photo shoots/and record. I suspect in this market, she has pulled up the for sale sign tho... I don't imagine too many $14million places are changing hands right now!
Yes like I Said before you were right that it was on the market. But we can safely assuming it's not on the market now because she says in this recent interview thta she is keeping it.

Stevie is an amazing economist though.
__________________
Photobucket
SN 8/24/07 & 6/21/08 FM 4/15/09 LB 10/18/08
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-31-2009, 07:48 PM
daniellaaarisen's Avatar
daniellaaarisen daniellaaarisen is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Monte Sereno, CA
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LikeAWillow View Post
That.house.is.beautiful. Dani, let's buy it and live like the sisters in Practical Magic. I shouldn't be allowed to post whilst on pain meds.

I HATE WISDOM TEETH.
Yup. We'll go visit Mama Nicks and tell her that we'll make sure that house stays nice and beautiful when she is away if she adopts us.

Deal? Deal.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-31-2009, 08:10 PM
carrie721's Avatar
carrie721 carrie721 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the north coast of OH
Posts: 11,312
Default

the neighborhood is boring and the house is like 25 feet from the street.



i'm not impressed.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-31-2009, 08:48 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
I got your point perfectly. I remembered that the house was on the market at one point. And for all we know, it STILL might be. That's what my whole diatribe about exclusive listings was about. We should all know that what comes out of Ms Nicks mouth can't always be believed, and is often exaggerated or stretched. She could still have the place on the market, and just be trying to find some use for it in the meantime as a place to do interviews/photo shoots/and record. I suspect in this market, she has pulled up the for sale sign tho... I don't imagine too many $14million places are changing hands right now!
I agree with you. The reason she gave was lame and whether or not it's on the market now, she'd probably jump at the chance to sell.

Michele
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++ picture

Billy Burnette Lp Self Titled On Columbia - Vg+ To Vg++ / Vg++

$11.99



BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+)

$5.00



Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12

Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12" Columbia LP + Lyrics VG+

$4.50



BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF-TITLED) - 1980 COLUMBIA VINYL RECORD - (VG/VG) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - (SELF-TITLED) - 1980 COLUMBIA VINYL RECORD - (VG/VG)

$4.50



BILLY BURNETTE  45 RPM Promo Record

BILLY BURNETTE 45 RPM Promo Record "SHOO-BE-DOO" 1978 Rock Unplayed MINT

$6.70




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved