Board needs a makeover - Page 2

carrie721 · #16 09-21-2007, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

No it isn't. It's chock a block full of bells & whistles, Sarah. The scripts & the jumpies & the doilies & the ten-thousand "features" can go for good, as far as I'm concerned. I'd like to see the forum go back to a single forum in the old Matt Wright look. You read, you post & that's it. People's words are what's interesting to me, not their sigs (although I loved Lisa's Let Me Show You My Demos sig!).

lucky for all you curmudgeons out there, you can turn off all those flashy doo-dads and the whippersnappers' sigs!

michelle2677 · #17 09-21-2007, 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starling

.......

I just saw your link at the bottom of your post. Is camiasdesigns your business??

if so, i have a crescent moon necklace from you and I absolutely love it. thank you

sorry

off topic.

gldstwmn · #18 09-22-2007, 12:14 PM

If it ain't broke...

kathy1 · #19 09-22-2007, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

If it ain't broke...

i agree with you .

Sarah · #20 09-22-2007, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kathy1

i agree with you .

i see you changed your signature picture, kathy. that's cute. i haven't seen that picture of stevie with the baby in a long time.

Starling · #21 09-22-2007, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kathy1

i agree with you .

But you agreed about the new background?

Anyway, no biggie and not starting any arguments. This is a touchy subject. Just thinking outside the box as that's what I have to do as a living for the most part.

kathy1 · #22 09-23-2007, 10:51 AM

i just thought that my signature picture needed a change.

kathy1 · #23 09-23-2007, 10:52 AM

i changed my avatar also did you notice?

Miss Vicky · #24 09-23-2007, 11:00 AM

What would keep the board "fresh" is if certain current members participated more. Starling, for example, in the 4 years that you've been a member, you've posted less than a hundred times. Yet you come in here and talk about the need for "fresh faces and a new look." I don't get it.

Nothing personal, I just don't get it.

buckymcnix · #25 09-23-2007, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky

What would keep the board "fresh" is if certain current members participated more. Starling, for example, in the 4 years that you've been a member, you've posted less than a hundred times. Yet you come in here and talk about the need for "fresh faces and a new look." I don't get it.

Nothing personal, I just don't get it.

I agree miss vicky - it seems that is generally new people or people who don't participate that much who call for these "make-overs".

I don't come here for the bells and whistles - i come for the people.
I find the board pretty easy to use and see no reason to go mucking it up with new designs.

Of course, just my opinion and the new owner Michelle probably has a few ideas of her own to implement and maybe one of them is new designs for the place - if so, of course i will adapt but i don't see the "look" of the board as a high priority, at least to me.

And in the humor department - maybe at the bottom of the main page, under who is online, under who is newest member, under whose birthday it is we could have the recent list of freshly bant people.

Miss Vicky · #26 09-23-2007, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckymcnix

And in the humor department - maybe at the bottom of the main page, under who is online, under who is newest member, under whose birthday it is we could have the recent list of freshly bant people.

Oh, I agree.

That is definitely one feature I'd like to see. A list of newly bant people would be most helpful.