Boston Globe interview - Page 2

editormarf · #16 10-11-2006, 09:12 PM

[QUOTE=danax6;580847]Took this from Seven Wonders:

Going his own way with solo album, tour
By Jonathan Perry, Globe Correspondent
October 11, 2006

where he chatted about the bad old days and the good new ones, and promised a reissue of 1973's pre-Mac debut, ``Buckingham Nicks" (now long out of print). Who knows, he says. He may even tour with his past and future songwriting foil, Stevie Nicks.

Geez, i saw this article in the Globe this AM and thought that maybe this is what people might be chatting about

Let's stop the sniping, friends

I think it would be great if when he's through with this tour and the next CD, they release that BN CD.

Johnny Stew · #17 10-11-2006, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lieueitak

I'll crawl out of the wood work and make my first post. Ken does make mention of Lindsey's reluctance to be a dad in the Q/A, but I think the article Johnny Stew is referring to is the one from Mojo 2003. The Nickfix, shockingly enough, has it.

Thanks for clearing up the origins of that statement. I knew I couldn't be the only one who remembered it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lieueitak

"Ballistic" might have been a bit of an overstatement, but I don't think we need to split hairs over it.

You're right -- "ballistic" was probably too strong of a word. But he was angry/displeased nonetheless, and I didn't get the impression that he was as "ready to find someone who could help (him) get to the next point in life" as he made it sound in this article.

JazmenFlowers · #18 10-11-2006, 10:40 PM

well, first off I adore Lindsey for a multitude of reasons...BUT

1) I never understand a damn thing he says
2) maybe it's just me, but I want to say get off the soapbox about how it's all about artistic integrity and everyone else is so money hungry and you aren't. I remember him mentioning the fact that he needs to make money (yeah right) cause he was building a house (during the recording of SYW).

of course, these same things could be said about a number of artists.

Sorceress · #19 10-11-2006, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cour

My reaction to Jason's comments today were not about Kristen or his children it was the nasty way he's continued to **** allover this tour and those quotes today were an example. . He's the only one who is constantly trying to stir the pot and the comments I quoted were his way of going overboard. I guess it's fine when he does even though he claims to be such a fan. Everyone has been so positive and enjoying the cd and tour and he finds it necessary to try to inject these types of comments whenever he can. It bothered him so much when dissention did it on the Stevie board, but he thinks its fine to do it at this particular time.

Maybe I don't know exactly what I'm getting into, but I can't help but feel compelled to comment on this. If you're referring to Jason's posts on the IWY thread, I really think you are misreading his tone and intent. I don't think that anyone is trying to **** on Lindsey's tour or his new album. It is possible to appreciate and even love the album without loving every single song. It is possible to fully enjoy Lindsey's live performances on this tour and still muse about Lindsey's own comments/lyrics/personal explanations of songs/observable actions, etc. and their relation to Stevie. Geez, listen to the man's own words. What kind of cast away dreams do you think he's dancing on? Either he had to say goodbye to Stevie yet again back during SYW, or he's deliberately being vague enough in his explanatory speech to imply that and maintain the drama that people seem to think he's finished with.

Let's be less hypersensitive and more respectful of each other.

strandinthewind · #20 10-12-2006, 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorceress

Maybe I don't know exactly what I'm getting into, but I can't help but feel compelled to comment on this. If you're referring to Jason's posts on the IWY thread, I really think you are misreading his tone and intent. I don't think that anyone is trying to **** on Lindsey's tour or his new album. It is possible to appreciate and even love the album without loving every single song. It is possible to fully enjoy Lindsey's live performances on this tour and still muse about Lindsey's own comments/lyrics/personal explanations of songs/observable actions, etc. and their relation to Stevie. Geez, listen to the man's own words. What kind of cast away dreams do you think he's dancing on? Either he had to say goodbye to Stevie yet again back during SYW, or he's deliberately being vague enough in his explanatory speech to imply that and maintain the drama that people seem to think he's finished with.

Let's be less hypersensitive and more respectful of each other.

Amen! I meant none of my commentary on LB's own words with derision. For the record, I love LB and his work. Like all of us (and this includes La Nicks) - his body of work has its highs and its lows, the reckoning of which is all subjective. I mean are we all to be automatons and just not discuss anything around here?

And - BTW - Cour calling someone a ****tte stirrer is laughable in its hypocrisy. Maybe we should all have to submit our posts to Cour for Nazi esq. editing prior to their public release

Kelly · #21 10-12-2006, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Amen! I meant none of my commentary on LB's own words with derision. For the record, I love LB and his work. Like all of us (and this includes La Nicks) - his body of work has its highs and its lows, the reckoning of which is all subjective. I mean are we all to be automatons and just not discuss anything around here?

And - BTW - Cour calling someone a ****tte stirrer is laughable in its hypocrisy. Maybe we should all have to submit our posts to Cour for Nazi esq. editing prior to their public release

The hypocrisy of saying one hasn't posted in a year when they have, is quite amusing as well.........

strandinthewind · #22 10-12-2006, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelly

The hypocrisy of saying one hasn't posted in a year when they have, is quite amusing as well.........

Not to mention I have had pretty much nothing but praise for this tour.

To wit --- I think SMAP in NYC was one of the more stunning things I have seen and I said that in that thread. That sure sounds like me doing nothing but continuing to "**** allover this tour"

I mean if you're gonna call me out, please have an inkling of knowledge. Cour should remember it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it - whatever.

BTFLCHLD · #23 10-12-2006, 11:24 AM

I don't think Lindsey would be alone in facing a pregnancy and being unsure about it or having varying good/bad feelings about it. What would be so unusual about this? Depending on their respective situation, there are some men who embrace it with 100% joy and there are some who are up/down throughtout the entire experience and beyond.

As to the marriage of Lindsey and Kirsten...I don't think anyone other than they can remark for certain on the qualities or lack of. I can only hope they are happy. And, should there be trouble now or in the future, I would hope they can work that out. Lindsey married her for a reason.

Cour · #24 10-12-2006, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelly

The hypocrisy of saying one hasn't posted in a year when they have, is quite amusing as well.........

This is especially rich coming from you. As usual, you don't know what you're talking about.

No, I have not posted in a year. In fact I believe it's been over a year since I posted. Bring it on, I'm more than willing to have JS or Marty check any posts from the last year that you are certain about, or even think might be mine.

I suppose this is like all the other trash you've been throwing out for the last year. I don't think you've been right about one piece of information you've posted about in the last year, and most of it has been nothing but out and out lies that you continue to pass on from people who feed you garbage. Even a clock is right twice a day. Your usual M.O. is to throw your so called inside information out there, and then when people come back to question you about your new information, you run away, ignoring the threads and posts, pretending they don't exist. But that doesn't stop you from continuing to throw it out there and hoping people believe it.

Cour · #25 10-12-2006, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Not to mention I have had pretty much nothing but praise for this tour.

To wit --- I think SMAP in NYC was one of the more stunning things I have seen and I said that in that thread. That sure sounds like me doing nothing but continuing to "**** allover this tour"

I mean if you're gonna call me out, please have an inkling of knowledge. Cour should remember it is better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it - whatever.

Perhaps I missed all your other posts of praise since the tour started and the cd was announced, besides your love of SMAP from the video posted. So, besides the SMAP performance, what other ones did I miss?

BTW, it doesn't bother me and I could care less if anyone doesn't like the cd, Lindsey or the tour. My post yesterday was directly related to your posts in the other thread. I believe even you made note that your comments were over the top (paraphrasing) and a few people came back and responded to your statements.

Kelly · #26 10-12-2006, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cour

This is especially rich coming from you. As usual, you don't know what you're talking about.

No, I have not posted in a year. In fact I believe it's been over a year since I posted. Bring it on, I'm more than willing to have JS or Marty check any posts from the last year that you are certain about, or even think might be mine.

I suppose this is like all the other trash you've been throwing out for the last year. I don't think you've been right about one piece of information you've posted about in the last year, and most of it has been nothing but out and out lies that you continue to pass on from people who feed you garbage. Even a clock is right twice a day. Your usual M.O. is to throw your so called inside information out there, and then when people come back to question you about your new information, you run away, ignoring the threads and posts, pretending they don't exist. But that doesn't stop you from continuing to throw it out there and hoping people believe it.

Yawn. You haven't posted as Cour, thats for sure.

Your usual MO is to come around and throw out your bull**** at very convenient times.

shackin'up · #27 10-12-2006, 04:58 PM

Nice article, huh?

Cour · #28 10-12-2006, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelly

Yawn. You haven't posted as Cour, thats for sure.

No, I have not posted as Cour or anyone else in the last year. You threw the accusation out there, go ahead, point to the posts you are certain about or even think are mine. Back it up! For once don't run away.

Another example of you throwing things out there and running away or changing the subject. I'm sure Marty or JS would be happy to check and confirm or deny any accusations you're making.

Quote:

Your usual MO is to come around and throw out your bull**** at very convenient times.

Again, rich coming from you. People have been drowning in the bull**** you've been passing around the last year and I don't think one thing has been accurate, close or anywhere near the truth.

danax6 · #29 10-12-2006, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cour

No, I have not posted as Cour or anyone else in the last year. You threw the accusation out there, go ahead, point to the posts you are certain about or even think are mine. Back it up! For once don't run away.

Another example of you throwing things out there and running away or changing the subject. I'm sure Marty or JS would be happy to check and confirm or deny any accusations you're making.

Again, rich coming from you. People have been drowning in the bull**** you've been passing around the last year and I don't think one thing has been accurate, close or anywhere near the truth.

sheesh..give it a rest already.
Sheesh

Johnny Stew · #30 10-12-2006, 05:15 PM

I'm going to have to ask that the personal squabbles be dropped or taken to emails. Things are getting personal and starting to sound a lot like feuding, which we have a very definite rule against here.