The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-11-2006, 11:07 AM
SuzeQuze's Avatar
SuzeQuze SuzeQuze is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: By the sea.
Posts: 10,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle2677
I was wondering the same thing.
We don't have to go there. It's a given that Ledgies are nuts!

But we're the good kind of crazy.
__________________
~Suzy
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-11-2006, 11:58 AM
DrummerDeanna DrummerDeanna is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 10,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jannieC
Lord knows I loathe Tom Cruise as much as the next person, but I honestly think it's so weird that we all speculate on NO baby (I say "we" because I've been guilty of wondering about it too). Just because they whore themselves out doesn't mean they want the same for their baby. They definitely don't owe us a picture of the child. I just wish WE all didn't care so much.

That's exactly how I feel. I mean sure they whored themselves out there - but a baby changes things and perhaps they just didn't want the big vulture paparazzi to harass the newborn

---

That weird picture is super creepy!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-11-2006, 03:26 PM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

it takes TIME to get a stand-in dontcha know
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-11-2006, 08:10 PM
BlackWidow's Avatar
BlackWidow BlackWidow is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: bouncing off the wall at you. being defined by the applause.
Posts: 7,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikerchic
Worth a read.....kinda creepy......adds to the saga......and kinda funny.

http://www.celebitchy.com/2006/08/fa...ut_the_su.html
yes..that was creepy indeed!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-12-2006, 12:15 AM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Lord knows I loathe Tom Cruise as much as the next person, but I honestly think it's so weird that we all speculate on NO baby (I say "we" because I've been guilty of wondering about it too). Just because they whore themselves out doesn't mean they want the same for their baby. They definitely don't owe us a picture of the child. I just wish WE all didn't care so much.
Look. Tom made it a POINT to court the paparazzi, and to be highly visible and to include Katie in as many photo ops as possible. To suggest that NOW they want privacy is ridiculous. They dont OWE us anything but to change gears now and act all coy is completely out of character with the past 9 months of gestation/engagement etc. Give me a break! If he's so freaking in love and proud of his baby then why isnt he showing pics of same to the world?
Any proud papa would do the same..........
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-12-2006, 11:56 AM
jannieC jannieC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
Look. Tom made it a POINT to court the paparazzi, and to be highly visible and to include Katie in as many photo ops as possible. To suggest that NOW they want privacy is ridiculous. They dont OWE us anything but to change gears now and act all coy is completely out of character with the past 9 months of gestation/engagement etc. Give me a break! If he's so freaking in love and proud of his baby then why isnt he showing pics of same to the world?
Any proud papa would do the same..........
Maybe he's trying to protect his baby? I feel squeamish defending him- I'm not really defending him, I'm just saying I could see where a celeb would draw the line with their child when it comes to privacy. I think it's completely ludicrous to sugest that they are hiding a secret- non baby, whatever. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems like such a weird stretch.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-12-2006, 12:29 PM
michelle2677's Avatar
michelle2677 michelle2677 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: at the railway station, waiting
Posts: 7,804
Default

Weren't there some pictures circulating of them swimming when she was pregnant?? I tried to find some but couldn't.
__________________
Photobucket
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-12-2006, 02:50 PM
bikerchic's Avatar
bikerchic bikerchic is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in the best damn country in the world
Posts: 2,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle2677
Weren't there some pictures circulating of them swimming when she was pregnant?? I tried to find some but couldn't.
There's always this one:

http://www.perezhilton.com/topics/up...katiepreg1.jpg
__________________
~Theresa~

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-12-2006, 03:30 PM
DrummerDeanna DrummerDeanna is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 10,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikerchic

Good God That's not attractive. At all.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-12-2006, 10:47 PM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jannieC
Maybe he's trying to protect his baby? I feel squeamish defending him- I'm not really defending him, I'm just saying I could see where a celeb would draw the line with their child when it comes to privacy. I think it's completely ludicrous to sugest that they are hiding a secret- non baby, whatever. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems like such a weird stretch.
What I am saying is its ODD to be so prominent throughout her entire pregnancy and now be so secretive. I find the whole thing weird, from her birth cert anomalies to this. In three months time, very few people have seen this baby or if they have they're NOT talking which is weird

Some stuff Ive read says Katie is starting to feel like a prisoner and she doesnt like the fact that Tom's actions are causing such rampant speculation. Her parents must be so worried about her...
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 08-13-2006, 07:45 AM
jannieC jannieC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,468
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
What I am saying is its ODD to be so prominent throughout her entire pregnancy and now be so secretive. I find the whole thing weird, from her birth cert anomalies to this. In three months time, very few people have seen this baby or if they have they're NOT talking which is weird

Some stuff Ive read says Katie is starting to feel like a prisoner and she doesnt like the fact that Tom's actions are causing such rampant speculation. Her parents must be so worried about her...
I agree with you whole heartedly on the weird part. Tom Cruise makes me ill with his weirdness. Scientology touched my faily for a brief period so I know a little too much about that. Maybe Katie wants to show off the baby and Tom won't let her. Gah, I'm glad I'm not a celeb.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 08-13-2006, 10:44 AM
eclipse's Avatar
eclipse eclipse is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the bak of your mind....
Posts: 1,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jannieC View Post
I don't understand why they didn't just donate the money- rather than drag their baby into it.
Because they were paid the money for the option of "PEOPLE releases the
1st baby pictures of Brad and Angelina's baby".
That is where the money came from, (PEOPLE paid them for the baby pictures) .They in turn donated the money that people paid them...

(they might have that kind of money that they could donate themselves)
...but
I think it was a smart way to ...get it over with-stop being haunted for photos-and giving the $ to a good cause
__________________

For never have I been a blue calm sea...I have always been a storm, always been a storm... sln
~~eclipse~~
Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2006, 11:05 AM
eclipse
This message has been deleted by eclipse. Reason: copy
  #43  
Old 08-13-2006, 11:57 AM
DrummerDeanna DrummerDeanna is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 10,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jannieC View Post
I agree with you whole heartedly on the weird part. Tom Cruise makes me ill with his weirdness. Scientology touched my faily for a brief period so I know a little too much about that. Maybe Katie wants to show off the baby and Tom won't let her. Gah, I'm glad I'm not a celeb.
Especially since, if I'm not mistaken, Katie was raised a good Catholic girl - so her family must be FREAKING out. I mena Scientologist is a pretty big departure - and generally Catholic families (if they're practicing) don't take kindly to one of their own changes religions (to ANY religion).

I wonder if Katie herself thinks, "what have I done?" I mean was Cruise this outwardly bizarre before the whole thing? It seems as though once they became an item the kook factor was upped considerably - or maybe he was just getting more media attention

Either way - they're under no obligation to show us any baby...but the whole thing IS rather odd.

And I STILL hate that I have/am putting time and thought into this whole thing
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 08-13-2006, 12:56 PM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

GAH, I lost everything I wanted so say, so here goes:

Tom was never on my radar really until he freaked out on Oprah. I did feel badly for the split with Nicole because I like Nicole and I could see it upset her. But she's probably thanking her lucky Stars shes OUT! Plus I have a feeling that her rising star power gave her a bit more say-so in the relationship, something Katie doesnt have poor dear.....

Let me just reiterate, Tom and Katie dont OWE us pictures of the baby, but I find this NEW wish for privacy most hypocritical considering how much face time he and Katie got before. As I said, Tom HOGGED the celebrity news. He WANTED the attention. If he's so proud, why not show off his pride and joy? He could even benefit from it or donate fees to charity a la Brad and Angelina

I cant remember who said it but IMO, its TRUE, Tom's KOOK factor multiplied tenfold once he and Katie got together. There's something ROTTEN in Denmark (to borrow a phrase) for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 08-13-2006, 02:33 PM
michelle2677's Avatar
michelle2677 michelle2677 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: at the railway station, waiting
Posts: 7,804
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikerchic View Post

NAST-TEY
__________________
Photobucket
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


1970s Pop, Bob Brunning picture

1970s Pop, Bob Brunning

$5.40



1970s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD picture

1970s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD

$3.40



Reggae Hardcover Bob Brunning picture

Reggae Hardcover Bob Brunning

$8.05



Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae picture

Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae

$59.99



Heavy Metal by Bob Brunning - Hardcover 1999 - VERY GOOD picture

Heavy Metal by Bob Brunning - Hardcover 1999 - VERY GOOD

$8.44




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved