Alert: Demonizing Condi - Page 4

SuzeQuze · #46 10-26-2005, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sparky

Really Suze ? Could you photoshop some dental work and humanity onto that reptilian hag ?

Dental? Yes. Humanity? I'm pretty talented but I don't think that's possible.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #47 10-26-2005, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

and said they were with affirmative action, which BTW - many R's vote for you numbskull.

Well, they are idiots!

Quote:

and - for your information Tower and Gldstwmn have said they were at one point homeless and they are both true success stories.

See there, thank you!

strandinthewind · #48 10-26-2005, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

. . . If your not part of the Reagan line of conservatives then NO you aren't a conservative!

Well, no. RR was a neo conservative who used, inter alia, Christianity as a wedge to win.

Again, if no govt. interference is the goal, as you have stated it is, then why should the govt. define or sanction marriage in any way. Wouldn't not defining or sanctioning it lessen the interference in our lives? Moreover, as pointed out by the atni-gay marriage people, contracts can supply almost all of the rights inherently given to one group by the govt. but not the other. So, why not take it out completely and, thus, interfer less in our lives. That way Churches can marry whatever people they want as they do now.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #49 10-26-2005, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

How can you people continue to converse with this page after page? My IQ drops 12 points just reading **** like that.

Then don't read! DUH!

strandinthewind · #50 10-26-2005, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

. . . See there, thank you!

an d how does that support your premise that none of the homeless want out, or that all these people are fifth generation welfare takers? It does not. It means the system on some level worked by helping these and other people.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #51 10-26-2005, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Well, no. RR was a neo conservative who used, inter alia, Christianity as a wedge to win.
.

Honey, we are a Christian nation...it's time you learned it!

Every President has invoked the name of God! EVERYONE!

strandinthewind · #52 10-26-2005, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

How can you people continue to converse with this page after page? My IQ drops 12 points just reading **** like that.

I have a feeling our newly formed rump ranger is about to turn the corner

Brwn_eyes0511 · #53 10-26-2005, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

an d how does that support your premise that none of the homeless want out, or that all these people are fifth generation welfare takers? It does not. It means the system on some level worked by helping these and other people.

Repeal the New Deal!

strandinthewind · #54 10-26-2005, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

Honey, we are a Christian nation...it's time you learned it!

Every President has invoked the name of God! EVERYONE!

Yes they have and I have no problem with that because that is their religion and I am in no place to tell them what they can and cannot worship. I just do not want them to use the laws of this nation to use their religion or their form of Christianity to rule my life. Moreover, the Const. specifically never mentions God and the drafters did so intentionally to avoid religious tyranny. But, your comment proves you are not a conservative, but a neo conservative, which is to say a religious zealot and thus a fool.

dissention · #55 10-26-2005, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

Then don't read! DUH!

Oh, trust me, I'm trying my darndest to concentrate on the intelligent ones.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #56 10-26-2005, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I have a feeling our newly formed rump ranger is about to turn the corner

WRONG!

Silly rabbitt!

dissention · #57 10-26-2005, 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I have a feeling our newly formed rump ranger is about to turn the corner

And I'm donating to The Gropenfuehrer's re-election campaign.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #58 10-26-2005, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Oh, trust me, I'm trying my darndest to concentrate on the intelligent ones.

But yet you are still here!

dissention · #59 10-26-2005, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

But yet you are still here!

Yes. In case you hadn't realized, there are intelligent people in this thread whose comments I like to read. Your inanity is simply par for the course.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #60 10-26-2005, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Yes they have and I have no problem with that because that is their religion and I am in no place to tell them what they can and cannot worship. I just do not want them to use the laws of this nation to use their religion or their form of Christianity to rule my life. Moreover, the Const. specifically never mentions God and the drafters did so intentionally to avoid religious tyranny. But, your comment proves you are not a conservative, but a neo conservative, which is to say a religious zealot and thus a fool.

Lesson 1: If a non-conservative calls you a "religious zealot" then you know you are on the right track!

However, I must not be the biggest zealot out there. Not many "zealots" out there like the "snake" just as much as they do the "cat"!