Things that make you go ew. - Page 9

skcin · #**121** 08-01-2005, 05:26 PM

^ My, my, aren't we on a roll today

. Someone piss in your Cheerios, Chili?

strandinthewind · #**122** 08-01-2005, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD

Stevie Nicks covering Etta James.

You may have to be destroyed now

She slayed it and I love her recording

Johnny Stew · #**123** 08-01-2005, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skcin

Someone piss in your Cheerios, Chili?

Apparently Stevie Nicks!

dissention · #**124** 08-01-2005, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

She slayed it and I love her recording

Slayed it, my ass. She needs to back off the Etta James material.

strandinthewind · #**125** 08-01-2005, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Slayed it, my ass. She needs to back off the Etta James material.

If you would clip the forest of hair in and sticking out of your ears, maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about

dissention · #**126** 08-01-2005, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

If you would clip the forest of hair in and sticking out of your ears, maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about

I know perfectly well what I'm talking about. If you're going to cover Etta James, make sure it isn't all flash & novelty and nothing else. That, in itself, is an impossible task because you can feel Etta James in your bones when you listen to her voice. Stevie's take on "At Last" was a vocally superb live performance, but there was nothing else to it. It smacked of one artist covering another artist and doing it in an inferior way. "Sunday Kind of Love" was simply atrocious, no two ways about it in my book.

strandinthewind · #**127** 08-01-2005, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

I know perfectly well what I'm talking about. If you're going to cover Etta James, make sure it isn't all flash & novelty and nothing else. That, in itself, is an impossible task because you can feel Etta James in your bones when you listen to her voice. Stevie's take on "At Last" was a vocally superb live performance, but there was nothing else to it. It smacked of one artist covering another artist and doing it in an inferior way. "Sunday Kind of Love" was simply atrocious, no two ways about it in my book.

Blah Blah Blah - so much for the higher road of "to each their own" and the mere possibility that someone could have felt La Nicks's voice in their bones

I know I did

Moreover, to compare her to Etta James is unfair and no one was doing that

Oh well, at least you thought the vocal was superb - thus common ground

dissention · #**128** 08-01-2005, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Blah Blah Blah - so much for the higher road of "to each their own" and the mere possibility that someone could have felt La Nicks's voice in their bones

I know I did

Moreover, to compare her to Etta James is unfair and no one was doing that

Oh well, at least you thought the vocal was superb - thus common ground

Blah blah blergh. Higher road? As opposed to:

If you would clip the forest of hair in and sticking out of your ears, maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about.

GateandGarden · #**129** 08-01-2005, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiliD

Stevie Nicks covering Etta James.

I think it sucks ass, too. (Or, as Chris would say, it sucks and blows at the same time).

But then I get in trouble when I say that. But then I think I make up for it by loving something such as "Sister Honey." For every Stevie song I that I find crappy, there's another one that everyone else finds crappy and I dig.

But then I know you just wanna diss Stevie today.

strandinthewind · #**130** 08-01-2005, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Blah blah blergh. Higher road? As opposed to:

If you would clip the forest of hair in and sticking out of your ears, maybe you would know what the hell you are talking about.

touche' but you deserved it

dissention · #**131** 08-01-2005, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

touche' but you deserved it

Why, because I find her James covers vacuous?

strandinthewind · #**132** 08-01-2005, 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Why, because I find her James covers vacuous?

no, because I find your opinions as such

dissention · #**133** 08-01-2005, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

no, because I find your opinions as such

I'm grateful for that, because I would never use such a polite term to describe yours.

strandinthewind · #**134** 08-01-2005, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

I'm grateful for that, because I would never use such a polite term to describe yours.

Well, if you are vacuous, you lack ideas dear - so good luck because pithe without an abundance of ideas is beneath you - though it is not a far fall.

dissention · #**135** 08-01-2005, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Well, if you are vacuous, you lack ideas dear - so good luck because pithe without an abundance of ideas is beneath you - though it is not a far fall.

It's pith, dear. No e's.