Hillary’s ‘American Dream’: Stuck in the Middle With You

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Yeah, the infamous Dynasty fountain scene with Krystal and Alexis comes to mind.

Didn't we do that scene in Vegas

[irishgrl]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Then why is Clinton still behind Bush's reliance on that evidence. You talk a good game, but have yet to answer that question.

Also, Clinton and Bush I are fast friends now - isn't that just convenient.

BTW - those are polysyllabic words

That is easy too: BECAUSE IT fit with Bush's agenda. Why cant you see that?

If I want to promote a bit of propaganda, (and I had no scruples) it wouldnt bother me at ALL to promote faulty info as real, especially if it came from a source that many people believed in the first place....You need a lesson in smoke and mirrors apparently..............

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by irishgrl

That is easy too: BECAUSE IT fit with Bush's agenda. Why cant you see that?

If I want to promote a bit of propaganda, (and I had no scruples) it wouldnt bother me at ALL to promote faulty info as real, especially if it came from a source that many people believed in the first place....You need a lesson in smoke and mirrors apparently..............

Well, why is Clinton still behind it - does he have the same agenda as W? Why does he still say W properly relied on that information. I am still wating on that answer.

[irishgrl]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

You need to look that up. It is there - in fact, I just read it a few days ago. But, you never will because you illogically cannot see past your blind hatred for R's. I can and do.

Ill thank YOU to back your own statements mister! btw: a lot depends upon who your info is from.....we wouldnt want to rely on bogus info now WOULD WE?

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by irishgrl

Ill thank YOU to back your own statements mister! btw: a lot depends upon who your info is from.....we wouldnt want to rely on bogus info now WOULD WE?

Why should I bother when you cannot back your own.

I mean you just cannot abide the D's ever doing anything wrong and so blindly so, you will not look anything up that might ever go against your wrong views. BTW - I posted it a long time ago, around the time of the elections.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by dissention

I would cream myself if Arianna ran!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wouldn't it be funny if they changed the law for Arnold and Arianna ran against him (again)? That was a hoot.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I be sure and Fed Ex you a moist towel if it happens

But, considering she is a little bit of a hypocrite (don't drive an SUV, but I can fly in my provate jet to my huge power burning house) and she failed dismally in Calif., there is no way in hell she running. Please, I think she is not a US citizen.

It doesn't matter if she's a citizen or not. She wasn't born here.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

It doesn't matter if hse's a citizen or not. She wasn't born here.

that is what I meant

[irishgrl]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Well, why is Clinton still behind it - does he have the same agenda as W? Why does he still say W properly relied on that information. I am still wating on that answer.

NO NO and NO. Bush didnt "properly rely" on anything! I believe that when he got that faulty info from Clinton, he was prob jumping with GLEE....because THERE was the mechanism by which he could "legitimately" go into Iraq.......
The agendas were completely different. Bush wanted SH oil and didnt care HOW he got there, whether by hook or by crook. Clinton didnt seek to acquire Iraq's oil OR invad Iraq. Again, as you know, INTENT (let me repeat that) INTENTis a big part of evaluating a person's actions.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by DrummerDeanna

She isn't going to lose her Senate Seat...

The Democrats in New York are a mess - but the Repoublican? well - everyone's F***ed up in New York

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by irishgrl

I always thought McCain represented deliberation...and common sense. Im a bit surprised to hear objections to him but then, I'll be the first to admit I dont know all that much about GOP politicians, they are just too foreign to me to comprehend.

They actually hugged. It was vomit inducing.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by dissention

My love for Randi Rhodes knows no bounds. I adore adore adore adore that woman.

She loves you more.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by irishgrl

NO NO and NO. Bush didnt "properly rely" on anything! I believe that when he got that faulty info from Clinton, he was prob jumping with GLEE....because THERE was the mechanism by which he could "legitimately" go into Iraq.......
The agendas were completely different. Bush wanted SH oil and didnt care HOW he got there, whether by hook or by crook. Clinton didnt seek to acquire Iraq's oil OR invad Iraq. Again, as you know, INTENT (let me repeat that) INTENTis a big part of evaluating a person's actions.

Then why did Clinton say and still say W did - please answer that question

I agree Clinton did not want Iraq's oil, but though W may have wanted it, he doesn't have it. Yes, US companies made lots of $$$ over there, but surely there were easier ways to accomplish that. But, Clinton gave Halliburton no bid contracts as well. Hmmmmm - I am seeing a patter

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by dissention

Put a microphone in my hand and that's what I'd sound like.

She makes me laugh so much that it should be a crime and you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who relies on the facts as much as she does.

She had me going pretty good this afternoon.

[dissention]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

She loves you more.

Did you hear her on Friday when that woman called in and they got into a toussle over which site you get when you Google "failure"? I just about peed myself when she said "You're dumb as a rock."