What Does The Future Hold? - Page 3

LiquidBlue5000 · #31 07-02-2005, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diamondsnake

A rock and roll chic like Christine can't live on tulip beds alone. Sooner or later she'll come crawling back to the Mac. Just you watch!

ohhh, i would love that.. i really do miss the woman

paperflowers · #32 07-02-2005, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r

Yep, I think you're right that Mick and John stay in touch and Lindsey might be the most reclusive. But with Cory working with Stevie, he probably does stay in touch a little more. Btw, I didn't know Lindsey had a sister? I thought he had a few brothers.

might have my family tree ascew Cory's mom LB's sis-in-law?

glitter_fades · #33 07-02-2005, 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

I think the future of Fleetwood Mac holds some sort of something-or-other for the 40th anniversary in 2007.

Personally, I hope it involves some sort of public humiliation for the band that isn't too expensive for consumers to witness or hear.

I"d like to see a Fleetwood Mac version of Cirque du Soleil. Imagine a show where every member of the Mac -- Stevie, Danny, Bob Welch, John McVie, etc. -- exhibit acts of courage & skill, breathtaking physiographic formations & death-defying stunts hundreds of feet above the venue floor.

See Christine McVie & Dave Walker soar above the crowds on the trampoline & the power track, whilst singing "I'm a Road Runner" & the original, unrecorded studio take of "Hypnotized"!

Witness Stevie Nicks & Peter Green take Dave Mason by the ankles & swing him skyward over the vast abyss of space in the banquine act!

Are you trying to make me pee myself today?

Hawkeye · #34 07-02-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diamondsnake

Were people this pessimistic after the Dance?

Well lets see, after The Dance, one of the five quit, and the other 4 took SIX YEARS to record a new album

so if they were pessimistic they had good reason to be.

Hawkeye · #35 07-02-2005, 11:23 PM

And can I add, that to the people who say they'd rahter see Stevie record a new album then do her Rhiannon project, I think it's basically the same thing. Just with the Rhiannon thing, she's killing two birds with one stone.

SandyMac · #36 07-02-2005, 11:23 PM

I am going to be optimistic and say a new Stevie album in 2006, Rhiannon project finshed, and a new Fleetwood Mac album to tour with in 2007/2008

-Sandy

Hawkeye · #37 07-02-2005, 11:28 PM

I wouldnt mind if Fleetwood Mac took a page from The Eagles (cant believe i wrote those words!) and maybe go into the studio for few months, then tour without a new album and then go back to the studio to finish the album now Fleetwood Mac would differ from The Eagles in they'd actually make the album.

David · #38 07-02-2005, 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye

And can I add, that to the people who say they'd rahter see Stevie record a new album then do her Rhiannon project, I think it's basically the same thing. Just with the Rhiannon thing, she's killing two birds with one stone.

Which two? The white & the green? The white & the golden? Or the green & the golden?

LiquidBlue5000 · #39 07-02-2005, 11:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye

And can I add, that to the people who say they'd rahter see Stevie record a new album then do her Rhiannon project, I think it's basically the same thing. Just with the Rhiannon thing, she's killing two birds with one stone.

She could really turn this into a whole big thing.. It could be a soundtrack to the movie.. how awesome would that be?? then a tour to promote the movie and the soundtrack...

SteveMacD · #40 07-03-2005, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue5000

and Becca.. don't forget Becca!!!

That's why I prefaced who was included with the word "significant." Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Stevie, Lindsey, and Bekka jamming out on "Angel" in concert. But as much I like Bekka, I don't think she, Dave Mason, Rick Vito, Dave Walker, Bob Brunning or Bob Weston had terribly significant tenures in Fleetwood Mac, and Danny Kirwan is too far gone to turn around. That's why I'd have to limit it to Mick, John, Stevie, Lindsey, Peter, Jeremy, Welch, and Billy for the tour, and Christine and Jeremy added for an album. I mean, screw the 30th anniversary of "Rumours." I want a Fleetwood Mac 40th anniversary celebration!

GardenStateGirlie · #41 07-03-2005, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue5000

She could really turn this into a whole big thing.. It could be a soundtrack to the movie.. how awesome would that be?? then a tour to promote the movie and the soundtrack...

Anything to make her forget the Goldfish and the Ladybug project she never touched

gldstwmn · #42 07-03-2005, 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

Which two? The white & the green? The white & the golden? Or the green & the golden?

gldstwmn · #43 07-03-2005, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GardenStateGirlie

Anything to make her forget the Goldfish and the Ladybug project she never touched

Oh Gawd. I think it's my least favorite Stevie song ever.

darklinensuit · #44 07-03-2005, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GardenStateGirlie

Anything to make her forget the Goldfish and the Ladybug project she never touched

You mean old Flush And Swat? (Did I spoil the ending?)

- Jake

paperflowers · #45 07-03-2005, 01:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r

I have always thought that Stevie felt held down when she was with FM as opposed to solo. From her clothes to her performances. I know it's unpopular to think this, but I agree that it has a lot to do with Lindsey. Compare the SYW tour to Vegas to now! Huge difference. SYW tour, she seemed tired a lot and much more reserved and the way she dressed really was not hot. Vegas? Smoking hot! Now? I would go gay for her. I think it's obvious she's more herself and loose when she's on her own. Just my opinion.

As far as Stevie low keyed attitude during the SYW tour my feeling is that there were a multitude of reasons she acted this way. From the very few interviews she did (which in it's self says something) to her presents on stage I think she made a conscious effort to allow Lindsey to shine. Not to say his performance can't stand alone no far from it, its just that I think she really wanted it to be LINDSEY'S day, and this was her way giving her blessing.

The horrid cardigan was another concession in the same spirit. Why Lindsey felt she needed to be "more casual" why would he care, well that's a whole other discussion. I feel as though Stevie didn't have anything to prove anymore and things like dresses and stage time just weren't as important to her. There has been much discussion how she just wasn't feeling well during a good portion of the first leg of the tour and perhaps thatâ€™s another reason her stage presents was low key.

I agree that Stevie is way more outgoing as a solo act and always has been I think she took it down several knotches for SYW.

My avatar is proof she did perk up

and show what mamma gave her.

I think it wouldn't be too far off however if Stevie chose ROCK and ROLL to cover on her solo tour as a reference to the SYW Stevie.

Been along time since I Rock and Rolledâ€¦.hmmmmm

I know I have mentioned this before but Stevie is HOT HOT HOT HOT on this tour geezey petes SMOKIN' ...

I think she lost a bit of weight and has no real pressure to promote anything and just feels SEXY and I LOVE IT!!!!