And another album cover too! Live in Boston... - Page 2

Merf · #16 04-27-2004, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwys_soapbox

Overall, I think it's nice. Not as good as The Dance, but good enough. Still, I have to get this out of my system: COUSIN IT!!!!! Anyone get my meaning? Show the lovely face, Stephanie!

John

The Dance is the most gorgeous album cover. EVER. EVER.... EVER.

sparky · #17 04-27-2004, 11:26 PM

TOTAL COUSIN IT ! ROTFLMAO !!!
I kinda like it.

estranged4life · #18 04-28-2004, 12:01 AM

if Stevie is Cousin It (Btw, Stevie could be Morticia in that ol' black dress!!!) then it's safe to assume Mick is Lurch???

"Their creepy and their kooky...Mysteriously spooky...The Fleetwood Mac family"

**jbrownsjr** · #19 04-28-2004, 12:12 AM

Mick looks like he has diareah! LOL

rianbay1 · #20 04-28-2004, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

How come if I joke about wanting it all to focus on Lindsey I'm told I'm unappreciative of the band, but we can get away with saying the same about Stevie? Is there an anti-Lindsey orgasnisation running this board, or perhaps just an anti-Lux organisation? Wherever I go, I never fail to piss people off.

WHOO HOO!!! Something as simple as discussion about the album cover is now going to turn into yet ANOTHER Stevie VS. Lindsey debate. (No offense Lux, I'm surely adding fuel to the fire here myself.) Last I checked, it wasn't allowed to focus on Stevie either without being flagged as a silly "Chiffon head" . Nobody can win I guess.

rianbay1 · #21 04-28-2004, 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

Perhaps this is why we have our buckinghamnicks chat. Lindsey's crotch! Damn tourettes again.

LOL. Point taken.

DownOnRodeo · #22 04-28-2004, 03:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by no_spoken_word

I love the cover! Particularly because Stevie takes up more room than the rest of them put together!

yes, well... that's another issue altogether which I wasn't really going to raise cause I saw it going down a pointless SvL course of discussion. Either way, I've rationalized that her face is hidden and she's turned away which equals out her size.

That said, I like how she's sort of (justifiably) depicted as the sort of 'spirit' of the band on stage. Lindsey has that yellowy 'energy' light around him so that's good enough for me. I think it's great, just showing them what they do best.

DownOnRodeo · #23 04-28-2004, 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by estranged4life

"Their creepy and their kooky...Mysteriously spooky...The Fleetwood Mac family"

And Mick as Lurch

Perhaps an alternate band name: 'Stevie and the Family Stoned'?

Gypsy-Rhiannon · #24 04-28-2004, 03:50 AM

Has anyone pre-ordered this?

Pip

MacMan · #25 04-28-2004, 04:03 AM

Now that's a great album cover!!!

I'd rather these "action" shots blended together then a single shot of them all together in one pic on stage just standing there facing the audience... How boring would that be? At least with these shots it's up close, and captures the essense of each individuals perfomance... Remember it is a promo tool... not a poster!

strandinthewind · #26 04-28-2004, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

I swear I wasn't trying to start a debate! I wasn't even annoyed, I was just being observant (or was it subservient, no, I think it was observant). I don't care if people rabbit on about how much they love Stevie, but I seem to get shut down whenever I hint to the fact that I really only care for Lindsey('s body).

Perhaps this is why we have our buckinghamnicks chat. Lindsey's crotch! Damn tourettes again.

With all due respect, you do not just "hint to the fact that I really only care for Lindsey('s body)" or at least it comes across that way. You say things like, in sum, LB should be up there alone and La Nicks should not be there, etc. Again, even though I think most people have no problem with you feeling that way, you must realize by now that when you say things like that even in jest, people are going to call you on it because it comes across as disrespect of Stevie and her significant contributions as a member of FM. So, IMO, you are not being singled out in any way and it is not a personal attack on your feelings for LB. It is a reminder that he is not the only person in FM

Also, although they are all featured on the cover, La Nicks is more prominently featured on the cover because she is the most recognized member of FM and they (record company and band) want this to sell. Note: I am not slamming LB or Mick or John. But, clearly Stevie is more recognizeable and initial reaction from the majority of people glancing at a group of discs by different artists is very very important from a marketing perspective. That is all I am saying.

CarneVaca · #27 04-28-2004, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownOnRodeo

Also, what's so good about Boston? Great venue/crowds or something? It's just that I know there's that other Boston CD from the early Mac.

Watch your mouth, young man! Boston Tea Party. We might have been under the Brits (no offense, Pip et al) as long as the Australians were otherwise.

CarneVaca · #28 04-28-2004, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

How come if I joke about wanting it all to focus on Lindsey I'm told I'm unappreciative of the band, but we can get away with saying the same about Stevie? Is there an anti-Lindsey orgasnisation running this board, or perhaps just an anti-Lux organisation? Wherever I go, I never fail to piss people off.

Let me take a crack at this. The Stevie crowd is much larger. The Lindsey crowd is smaller (and hardly a crowd, more like a team), but way more refined and sophisticated.

Of coure, there is also a third contingent, the Buckingham-Nicks crowd, consisting of members who claim they like both equally but usually favor Stevie a little more. A subgroup of that is the "Never Admit It" crowd, and these are the people who realize Lindsey has gotten better with time while Stevie stagnated somewhere around 1984, made a slight improvement in the late 90s and then reached another plateau, albeit not nearly as low as 1984. They realize that, but they'll never admit it publicly.

So don't feel bad. Just rejoice in knowing you are among the sophisticates.

dissention · #29 04-28-2004, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarneVaca

Let me take a crack at this. The Stevie crowd is much larger. The Lindsey crowd is smaller (and hardly a crowd, more like a team), but way more refined and sophisticated.

Of coure, there is also a third contingent, the Buckingham-Nicks crowd, consisting of members who claim they like both equally but usually favor Stevie a little more. A subgroup of that is the "Never Admit It" crowd, and these are the people who realize Lindsey has gotten better with time while Stevie stagnated somewhere around 1984, made a slight improvement in the late 90s and then reached another plateau, albeit not nearly as low as 1984. They realize that, but they'll never admit it publicly.

So don't feel bad. Just rejoice in knowing you are among the sophisticates.

I must be part of the "Always Admit It" crowd.

CarneVaca · #30 04-28-2004, 08:44 AM

I have serious doubts about whether this is the actual album cover. It's pretty cheesy. I could have made that myself.

Also, you might have noticed that when you click Marty's link in the original post there is also an item for a "PBS Special" with a release date of Jan. 1 2010. That raises some questions. What is the difference between these two releases? Could the PBS special be the Lindsey show? I would pay 50 bucks for the Lindsey appearance. That is really what I want.