The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Stevie Nicks
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 02-19-2015, 01:11 AM
sorcerer999's Avatar
sorcerer999 sorcerer999 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PenguinHead View Post
Street Angel - Uranus
...because it's such a stinker?

And I would have placed "Wild Heart" as Venus...since it's basically the "love and romance" record. Just my opinion, though. These are all great!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-19-2015, 02:44 AM
PenguinHead's Avatar
PenguinHead PenguinHead is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorcerer999 View Post
...because it's such a stinker?

And I would have placed "Wild Heart" as Venus...since it's basically the "love and romance" record. Just my opinion, though. These are all great!
You're right. The Other Side of the Mirror should be Neptune.

I like Street Angel, but Uranus just felt right!
__________________
Life passes before me like an unknown circumstance

Last edited by PenguinHead; 02-19-2015 at 02:52 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-19-2015, 07:24 AM
The Juggler The Juggler is offline
Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 64
Default

I think Nasal In Shangri-La is her worst album, apart from Street Angel.
It can be divided into two - excellent and awful:

Excellent
Trouble In Shangri-La
Candlebright
Sorcerer
Planets
Bombay Sapphires
Fall From Grace
Love Is

Awful
All the rest of the songs

There's no other album with such a clear divide. Apart from the material, Stevie's voice is really rough and bland on most of the tracks - the only vocal variation we get is the falsetto notes in Sorcerer, apart from that it's the same rough, forced voice throughout.

Also I find the production a bit bland - there's nothing wrong with it, but at the same time there's nothing that stands out - it's a plateau of middling production with no personality. I wish Dave Stewart had produced the album, because even the great songs suffer a bit from this bland production.

Dave knows how to produce Stevie's material, with the right amount of light and shade, and you can clearly see in the documentary they worked hard to get the right sound of the In Your Dreams album - it's modern but also very boho and funky in some parts. TISL has the same pop and drums production in every song even though there was a multitude of producers.

So yes, you can clearly see I disagree with the OP - I think IYD and 24 Karat Gold are far superior albums and are my favourites outside of The Wild Heart and Bella Donna. 24KG in particular has such a smooth and beautiful production, and all the songs are top notch (apart from Hard Advice and I Don't Care which is far too long).
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-19-2015, 10:33 AM
AnthonyMI AnthonyMI is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 801
Default

I think TISL had a very good start. The initial Sheryl Crow produced cuts had promise.

Imagine if she had not given Practical Magic two songs. Then If You Ever Did Believe and Crystal may have been on TISL.

If you Ever Did Believe
Crystal
Nomad/Candlebright
Sorcerer
Its Only Love
Fall From Grace



These were my favorites and with the addition of I Miss You I think make a damn near perfect album. I think she was trying too hard to have a Santana rebound like the one he had a year or two earlier. She did not need all that production.

Add in the extended uncut version of Love IS and i think 8 or 9 tracks would have been perfect for a "come back" album. Sometimes MORE is NOT better.

After these songs the vocals got worse with each producer she added. Too Far from Texas is horrid, Planets is so overproduced and dated I can hardly listen to it. My Heart had some good parts, but those certain notes just kill it.

Anyhow, hindsight is 20/20! And the nice thing about iTunes is I can make a custom Playlist and redo TISL to my own taste, include those tracks from Practical Magic, cut the ones I loathe (no Prixsie Fricks or Donald Duck sounding Macy Grey thanks!!)

IN You Dreams had moments of overproductions, but at LEAST, it had ONE producer and not the 5 or so from TISL. IT had a cohesive "sound" and her voice did not change from one song to the next. I think TISL was recorded over a three year period? And I think it was the period her voice went through the biggest chances since the mid 80's. SO it was jarring.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-19-2015, 10:38 AM
AnthonyMI AnthonyMI is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 801
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PenguinHead View Post
I like all her albums for their unique and distinct atmosphere. Each is a planet in Stevie's universe.

Bella Donna - Sun
Wild Heart - Neptune
Rock a Little - Mars
The Other Side of the Mirror -Venus
Street Angel - Uranus
Trouble in Shangria - Saturn
In Your Dreams - Jupiter
24 Karat Gold - Earth

That would make Soundstage Sessions "Pluto". A planet, but not reaaaaally a Planet.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-19-2015, 01:18 PM
KarmaContestant's Avatar
KarmaContestant KarmaContestant is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PenguinHead View Post
I like all her albums for their unique and distinct atmosphere. Each is a planet in Stevie's universe.
Wild Heart - Neptune
The Other Side of the Mirror -Venus
Interesting. I'd flip these. Venus is, after all, the planet of love, beauty, desire and relationships. All of the things that are attractive to us, by scent, sight, touch and feeling. The Wild Heart is Stevie's self-professed album about love, sex, and relationships.

Traditionally, Neptune rules over mental disorders, psychic abilities, addictions and escapism. Illusions and spirits are the domain of Neptune. Sound like The Other Side of the Mirror?
__________________
I'm not the man you think I am. My love has never lived indoors - I had to drag it home by four, hired hounds at both my wrists, damp and bruised by strangers' kisses on my lips. But you're the one that I still miss. Neko Case
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-19-2015, 01:38 PM
markolas's Avatar
markolas markolas is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,679
Default

I haven't listened to TISL in its entirety in a very long time. I hate to badmouth it too much because I really loved it at the time of its release, but my gut feeling is that, no, it is not better than IYD or 24k. At all.

I would say that I really like the first five songs on it (I know people here hate Every Day, but I've always liked it), but it falls apart in the middle. IYD and 24k both hold up all the way through, despite them both having 1 or 2 songs I don't care for.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-19-2015, 03:17 PM
sorcerer999's Avatar
sorcerer999 sorcerer999 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,080
Default

I think most of us hardcore fans start out REALLY enjoying her solo records when they first come out, but then after 6 months to a year, we get bored...start getting hyper critical, we pick out our staple favorites, our guilty pleasures, and tear down the rest.

It was easy to be hyper critical of 24KG from the get go, due to the fact that only 3 years had passed since her last solo record, whereas it had been 8 years in between SA and TISL, and a decade between TISL and IYD. It was easy to be forgiving (and even unintentionally have blinders on) whenever these two albums were released. We were all starved for new Stevie music. I remember thinking, "Yeah, That Made Me Stronger kind of has cheesy lyrics, but I guess the Sitar-esque guitar groove is pretty cool." or "I suppose the sentiment of Cheaper Than Free is sweet, so..."

Yeah, I can't stand those songs now.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-20-2015, 08:50 AM
twinmatrix twinmatrix is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 394
Default

TISL is my favorite Stevie album, and one of my favorite albums of all time. Every single track on TISL is a 5/5 to me, except Sorcerer.

TISL > IYD > 24k

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorcerer999 View Post
I think most of us hardcore fans start out REALLY enjoying her solo records when they first come out, but then after 6 months to a year, we get bored...start getting hyper critical, we pick out our staple favorites, our guilty pleasures, and tear down the rest.

It was easy to be hyper critical of 24KG from the get go, due to the fact that only 3 years had passed since her last solo record, whereas it had been 8 years in between SA and TISL, and a decade between TISL and IYD. It was easy to be forgiving (and even unintentionally have blinders on) whenever these two albums were released. We were all starved for new Stevie music. I remember thinking, "Yeah, That Made Me Stronger kind of has cheesy lyrics, but I guess the Sitar-esque guitar groove is pretty cool." or "I suppose the sentiment of Cheaper Than Free is sweet, so..."

Yeah, I can't stand those songs now.
I find the lyrics of That Made Me Stronger very empowering, haha.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-20-2015, 12:22 PM
bombaysaffires bombaysaffires is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Coast
Posts: 6,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonyMI View Post
IN You Dreams had moments of overproductions, but at LEAST, it had ONE producer and not the 5 or so from TISL. IT had a cohesive "sound" and her voice did not change from one song to the next. I think TISL was recorded over a three year period? And I think it was the period her voice went through the biggest chances since the mid 80's. SO it was jarring.
really?? The production quality of her vocals on 24k is shameful. The cuts from one take to another are pasted together so blatantly obviously, it's like a five year old did them. You can hear complete differences in quality-- some she sounds all muffled and slurry and spitty and other parts her vocals are crisp and even a bit tinny. Frankenstein vocals made up of pieces from here and there stitched very badly together.

Dave should be shot for the sh&tty editing and production. Sounds cheaply slapped together.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-20-2015, 12:28 PM
pauls90 pauls90 is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bombaysaffires View Post
really?? The production quality of her vocals on 24k is shameful. The cuts from one take to another are pasted together so blatantly obviously, it's like a five year old did them. You can hear complete differences in quality-- some she sounds all muffled and slurry and spitty and other parts her vocals are crisp and even a bit tinny. Frankenstein vocals made up of pieces from here and there stitched very badly together.

Dave should be shot for the sh&tty editing and production. Sounds cheaply slapped together.
I agree. The production was flat and the mixing poor on 24KG.

I personally love Shangri-La. It contains her best lyrics since TWH.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-20-2015, 01:08 PM
MoonSister75's Avatar
MoonSister75 MoonSister75 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: West Wales
Posts: 960
Default

Thumbs up for TISL from me. Whether it is better than her other recent albums, I don't really know.... But out of all her albums, it's the one I enjoy listening to the most, along with Bella Donna. It just has a certain sparkle to it
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-20-2015, 01:26 PM
Neal's Avatar
Neal Neal is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 1,739
Default

To these layman's ears, 24KG sounds criminally under produced. With the exceptions of the title track, "Belle Fleur", and the stunning "ATBW", every song sounded superior in its original demo form. I'm sure the truncated time frame played a part, but Dave did a much better job on IYD.

Despite some nasally vocals, TISL is on par with IYD, in my humble opinion.
__________________
"Ooh, there is magic...all around you...
every time you walk in the room..."
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-20-2015, 02:34 PM
sorcerer999's Avatar
sorcerer999 sorcerer999 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neal View Post
To these layman's ears, 24KG sounds criminally under produced. I'm sure the truncated time frame played a part, but Dave did a much better job on IYD.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bombaysaffires View Post
really?? The production quality of her vocals on 24k is shameful. The cuts from one take to another are pasted together so blatantly obviously, it's like a five year old did them. You can hear complete differences in quality-- some she sounds all muffled and slurry and spitty and other parts her vocals are crisp and even a bit tinny. Frankenstein vocals made up of pieces from here and there stitched very badly together.
I guess it's just a matter of perspective. Different strokes for different folks and what have you. I happen to relish the fact that 24KG is under produced. It was a welcomed change from the last two albums. Yes there are differences in crispness on different verses on certain songs, likely due to microphones and one take being recorded in Nashville and another take re-recorded in L.A. I can only really hear this on Mabel Normand and Watch Chain...but unless you are truly listening for those sorts of things, it's not blatantly obvious. And even after it was pointed out to me, it still did not affect my enjoyment of the songs.

I love the sparse instrumentation. I love that you can still hear a guitar reverb echo at the end of IYWML, as well as someone talking in the background at the end of Starshine (you need headphones and the volume way up to hear that one)...and of course the clapping at the end of Lady. It's like guerilla filmmaking. They were in a time crunch. The record, while still showcasing these "tiny" foibles and "mistakes", if you will, is still mixed and mastered extremely well. It all goes back to that time crunch - they didn't have time to give the songs to someone like Chris Lord-Alge to work on for 6 weeks. So they did it themselves, and I think they did a great job.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoonSister75 View Post
Thumbs up for TISL from me. But out of all her albums, it's the one I enjoy listening to the most, along with Bella Donna. It just has a certain sparkle to it
Now, I will agree with you there. Despite only really enjoying half of the songs, it really does have it's own certain "sound", or "SPARKLE" as you say. Somehow Crow, Shanks and that other guy (can't remember his name) managed to keep a cohesion (or predominant sound or magic) that runs like a thread through the entire record, so I'll give them that. Crow's "Sorcerer" effortlessly blends into Shank's "Planets" with such fluidity.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-20-2015, 02:34 PM
wheart's Avatar
wheart wheart is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: South Philadelphia
Posts: 2,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorcerer999 View Post
I think most of us hardcore fans start out REALLY enjoying her solo records when they first come out, but then after 6 months to a year, we get bored...start getting hyper critical, we pick out our staple favorites, our guilty pleasures, and tear down the rest.

It was easy to be hyper critical of 24KG from the get go, due to the fact that only 3 years had passed since her last solo record, whereas it had been 8 years in between SA and TISL, and a decade between TISL and IYD. It was easy to be forgiving (and even unintentionally have blinders on) whenever these two albums were released. We were all starved for new Stevie music. I remember thinking, "Yeah, That Made Me Stronger kind of has cheesy lyrics, but I guess the Sitar-esque guitar groove is pretty cool." or "I suppose the sentiment of Cheaper Than Free is sweet, so..."

Yeah, I can't stand those songs now.
maybe YOU got bored after 6 months but don't speak for the rest of us. While I like some of Stevie's solo work more than others, I've never grown BORED with any of them.
__________________

I remember it all...you just had to fall...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Peter Green -:::SEALED:::- The End Of The Game - CD picture

Peter Green -:::SEALED:::- The End Of The Game - CD

$22.50



CD Peter Green Blue Guitar Castle Communications 1991 Rock Blues picture

CD Peter Green Blue Guitar Castle Communications 1991 Rock Blues

$24.99



Peter Millar Womens RSM Classic Performance  Shirt Teal Green Large

Peter Millar Womens RSM Classic Performance Shirt Teal Green Large "Asher logo"

$45.99



Peter Green - In The Skies - Expanded Edition [New CD] Bonus Tracks, Expanded Ve picture

Peter Green - In The Skies - Expanded Edition [New CD] Bonus Tracks, Expanded Ve

$17.10



Fleetwood Mac - Peter Green’s Fleetwood Mac Simply Vinyl S125032 UK 2005 SEALED picture

Fleetwood Mac - Peter Green’s Fleetwood Mac Simply Vinyl S125032 UK 2005 SEALED

$49.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved