The Beatles Are Apples!!!

[singertobe]

Ok. So remember when I was venting about that "Stevie is a witch" thing and how the vid mentioned "Welsh Witch Publishing" as evidence?
Well, it just occurred to me that since the Beatles have a publishing company called Apple, this can only mean one thing:
ALL FOUR OF THE BEATLES ARE TASTY, DELICOUS APPLES!
This is the reason for the moptops ladies and gentlemen! They've been trying to hide their stem for all these years! Spread the word everybody! THE BEATLES ARE APPLES!!!!!

[singertobe]

Well this didn't go very far... :/

[paleshadow]

OK, I'll bite. The difference is, the Beatles didn't dress up in apple like clothing or write songs that could be construed as being about apples, or apple like, or any other fruit for that matter.

[chiliD]

Originally Posted by singertobe

Ok. So remember when I was venting about that "Stevie is a witch" thing and how the vid mentioned "Welsh Witch Publishing" as evidence?
Well, it just occurred to me that since the Beatles have a publishing company called Apple, this can only mean one thing:
ALL FOUR OF THE BEATLES ARE TASTY, DELICOUS APPLES!
This is the reason for the moptops ladies and gentlemen! They've been trying to hide their stem for all these years! Spread the word everybody! THE BEATLES ARE APPLES!!!!!

Originally Posted by singertobe

Well this didn't go very far... :/

Goes to show. Don't be messin' with the Beatles.

[vivfox]

Originally Posted by paleshadow

OK, I'll bite. The difference is, the Beatles didn't dress up in apple like clothing or write songs that could be construed as being about apples, or apple like, or any other fruit for that matter.

Well as you know their albums usually had a large green apple pictured in the middle of each vinyl record.

[paleshadow]

Originally Posted by vivfox

Well as you know their albums usually had a large green apple pictured in the middle of each vinyl record.

The OP was suggesting that people should accuse the Beatles of being apples like people accused Stevie of being a witch because of the name of their publishing company. It's like comparing apples to oranges, or in this case apples to witches. I'm just pointing out the difference between the two scenarios. If Stevie wore a suit and tie and sang songs about 18 wheelers, but named her publishing company Welsh Witch and put a picture of a broomstick on her albums, they wouldn't have called her a witch. The difference between the Beatles having Apple publishing (for one a person can't be an apple, but can be a witch) is Stevie embraced the stereotype, and therefore perpetuated the rumors at the same time she denied them.

[singertobe]

Originally Posted by paleshadow

OK, I'll bite. The difference is, the Beatles didn't dress up in apple like clothing or write songs that could be construed as being about apples, or apple like, or any other fruit for that matter.

What about Strawberry Fields?
And they don't need to dress like apples because Paul's smile is just so sweet!

[singertobe]

Proof! Proof I tell you!


Now we see them in their true form!