The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Christine McVie
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
View Poll Results: What do you think is most likely Christine's next move from here?
rejoin Fleetwood Mac 12 32.43%
new solo album 11 29.73%
go back to hiding and play with her dogs 14 37.84%
Other (please specify) 0 0%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old 09-30-2013, 12:51 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
Regarding Lindsey's motivations for blocking a partial return from Christine... I'm a bit torn. We all know how much of a purist & idealist he is. But at the same time, he's also repeatedly expressed his joy of the 21st century Fleetwood Mac dynamic. He likes the more "masculine" sound without Christine, and the fact he has more breathing room in the setlist.
Yes, he's expressed this many times. Too many times for me to think of it as completely truthful. I think it was partially true and partly false bravado because he was frustrated that she left.

Plus, even though he got to do more experimental things on SYW, Sad Angel and Miss Fantasy aren't masculine. If he has to write songs like that (which I like, mind you, I'm not a person who disparages those songs) to keep Stevie from feeling alienated from his sound, then he really has not gained anything from Christine being gone creatively. If he could make more Murrow, Red Rover, etc. in her absence, then that would be a reason to keep her away. But I actually think his best bet to make those songs is with her back. If they had twelve songs, Stevie and Christine's could be commercial (Christine) and pleasing to Stevie (Stevie's 4) while Lindsey's could be as strange as he liked, without anyone complaining too much, since there would be 2/3 other stuff to balance him.

As for Stevie, by naming Lindsey as the culprit -- when no one was named in 2003 as to why Christine couldn't record when she couldn't tour -- I think she was mud-slinging. She didn't have to say who was the person behind that and certainly didn't have to add that she herself didn't care about such things. I mean, I believe the general truth of what she said, but I don't believe she wasn't trying to make him look bad. Ten years ago they gave an explanation for Christine's absence without pointing the finger at anyone in particular. They made it sound like just a joint band consensus. This time around, it was Lindsey's view.

In fact, Mick said more about Lindsey and Christine being on the phone together and Mick wondering if it was really going to happen, than Stevie ever said about Lindsey perhaps influencing Christine's participation, back then.

Michele
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


1970s Pop, Bob Brunning picture

1970s Pop, Bob Brunning

$5.40



Fleetwood Mac: The First 30 Years, Bob Brunning picture

Fleetwood Mac: The First 30 Years, Bob Brunning

$6.91



Heavy Metal by Bob Brunning - Hardcover 1999 - VERY GOOD picture

Heavy Metal by Bob Brunning - Hardcover 1999 - VERY GOOD

$8.44



Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae picture

Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae

$89.99



Sound Trackers: Blues By Bob Brunning picture

Sound Trackers: Blues By Bob Brunning

$13.15




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved