|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
It seems like this would mean they would do more of her songs. If you think about it, Lindsey and Chris had a lot of involvement in Stevie's songs, and her songs became their songs because the entire band had to contribute. However, Stevie was neglected and only used for backing vocals for Lindsey's and Christine's songs. So to me it seems like they would use more of Stevie's songs so that way they would be more of a collaborative effort. That being said, I do think band politics and jealousy were the reason Stevie seemed to get the sham. Stevie was the one who got the most attention from the fans and media, why let her get all the songs too? And also, her songs are usually longer than Christine's or Lindsey's. That being said tho, even if you add up the time each one got in time per album, Stevie still gets shafted except for on Tusk.
__________________
-John You are allowed to feel messed up and inside out. It doesn't mean you're defective - it just means you're human.
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
In the end, if Stevie's (and the other two songwriters) management was on the ball they would insist their client would have a certain number of songs on each FM album. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
In some ways I believe Stevie didn't mind only having a couple songs on the first two records. She was just happy being a part of the band. She could come and go as she pleased and did her job when they needed her present. But eventually she needed another outlet for her other songs, which led to Bella Donna.
__________________
[SIGPIC]http://web-images.chacha.com/lady-gaga/did-lady-gaga-reveal-her-born-this-way-album-cover-1-200.jpg[/SIGPIC] |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So yeh, I also feel it was a gradual feeling of there not being the outlet that she would have had if it had just stayed her and Lindsey. Clearly there were also people around her whose business interests in how many units she could sell on her own coincided with certain other events - by which I mean that if Mick hadn't taken her best friend away from her, she wouldn't have given Paul Fishkin and Danny Goldberg a five-album solo contract. (I tend to think losing Sara hurt SN much more than losing Mick!) Seem to have got a bit OT there, soz! |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
It always seems to me that Lindsey worked it out so that he was on every song as much as possible. His duets with Christine, Hold Me and World Turning were not originally meant to be duets but Christine songs. I have always wondered why Stevie and Christine didn't sing together more often, I suspect Lindsey discouraged it. Stevie has said that when Lindsey was happy everybody was happy, so to keep what little peace they had the rest of the band let Lindsey have his way. Lindsey is a great guitarist, singer and producer, but Fleetwood Mac needed an outside producer to balance out the three distinctive sounds.
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
She was either going to be a superstar or a nobody... there was no in-between for her.... |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Fleetwood Mac also had Richard Dashut, Ken Caillat, Keith Olsen (White Album), and other band members who I am sure all voiced their opinions on their sound. |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Then, based on that one mention when they're high in the limo talking about Lindsey singing on Hold Me and Stevie telling Christine that "it's over" if she has Lindsey sing on another one of her songs, I think that Stevie thought the vocals were fully Christine's idea. I think when you have men and women in a band, it's just natural to have one singer from both sexes trade lyrics. It's just following an historic trend. I don't think Lindsey would have to sit around trying to devise ways for Straight Back never to happen again. The boy/girl thing is just more natural and organic. Michele Last edited by michelej1; 01-05-2011 at 01:46 AM.. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mick LaSalle on Stevie Nicks, Gallery of the Underrated, San Francisco Chronicle [she is listed 45 of 50 underrated celebs]
http://blog.sfgate.com/mlasalle/2011...rated/#1945-45 Stevie Nicks: When I was a teenager photos like the one above would make my jaw drop, and I'd just stare with devouring lust. Stevie Nicks looked like what everyone wanted their girlfriend to look like in 1976. But as a result of being so pretty, she was always written about as the lightweight of Fleetwood Mac. Lightweight? She was the best songwriter by far and put the others in the shade. (Getty Images) |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm probably going to receive a verbal backlash for this, but am I the only one who thinks Stevie is kind of, well...overrated? The people talk about Fleetwood Mac most of the time, you'd think she was the only member. John and Mick deserve the Lion's share of the rating because of the sheer fact that the band wouldn't even exist without them. Just because she's at the forefront of the stage, doesn't mean she's the "highlight" of the show. People forget those in the back who, nine times out of ten, contribute a hell of a lot more to the overall musical "recipe" than those in the limelight do.
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
So i agree. But i suppose you're thinking.......Of course YOU would, Mick. lol Mick
__________________
The large print giveth And the small print taketh away -Tom Waits |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() I personally think John is the most under rated, he's so cool.
__________________
~The band went past their allotted time, and the power was shut off. Mick Fleetwood kept drumming. ~Love is my higher power. Family is my strength. Art is my passion - Kat Von D |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|

$5.40
Heavy Metal by Bob Brunning - Hardcover 1999 - VERY GOOD
$8.44
1970s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD
$3.40
Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae
$99.99
Blues: The British Connection by Bob Brunning
$27.58