House panel approves measure to make abortion a felony

[dissention]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

By the way...the protestors that stand on this one street? Always men.

But, of course. There was an article in Rolling Stone a month or so back about this one guy who goes around protesting abortion clinics in California, he's a real piece of work. Protests right in front of doctors' houses and everything. The article sticks out in my mind because I found it incredibly offensive and distasteful on the part of Rolling Stone because they showed one of his flyers with a picture of an actual aborted fetus. I couldn't believe it.

[DrummerDeanna]

Originally Posted by dissention

But, of course. There was an article in Rolling Stone a month or so back about this one guy who goes around protesting abortion clinics in California, he's a real piece of work. Protests right in front of doctors' houses and everything. The article sticks out in my mind because I found it incredibly offensive and distasteful on the part of Rolling Stone because they showed one of his flyers with a picture of an actual aborted fetus. I couldn't believe it.

Back home the abortion protesters always had pictures of aborted fetuses on their signs and such...it was scary -there was a good mix of men and women though....

There were also a couple of hard-core nuns who'd wear sandwich signs and stuff one of them was arrested once for being involved in an abortion clinic bombing - way to be good Christians ladies...

[Miss Vicky]

Originally Posted by dissention

But, of course. There was an article in Rolling Stone a month or so back about this one guy who goes around protesting abortion clinics in California, he's a real piece of work. Protests right in front of doctors' houses and everything. The article sticks out in my mind because I found it incredibly offensive and distasteful on the part of Rolling Stone because they showed one of his flyers with a picture of an actual aborted fetus. I couldn't believe it.

Rolling Stone offensive and distasteful? Nah... never.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by dissention

But, of course. There was an article in Rolling Stone a month or so back about this one guy who goes around protesting abortion clinics in California, he's a real piece of work. Protests right in front of doctors' houses and everything. The article sticks out in my mind because I found it incredibly offensive and distasteful on the part of Rolling Stone because they showed one of his flyers with a picture of an actual aborted fetus. I couldn't believe it.

Not that I have seen every flyer out there, but pretty much ALL of the ones I have seen (which is not that many) misrepresent a three month or less fetus - rather, they show a fetus at eight months. That says to me they are scared taht if they show what the fetus looks like during the frist trimester, people will look at them and say - this is not a child yet. COWARDS!

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by dissention

But, of course. There was an article in Rolling Stone a month or so back about this one guy who goes around protesting abortion clinics in California, he's a real piece of work. Protests right in front of doctors' houses and everything. The article sticks out in my mind because I found it incredibly offensive and distasteful on the part of Rolling Stone because they showed one of his flyers with a picture of an actual aborted fetus. I couldn't believe it.

Did RS mention that most of them are paid?
Also, we have one of those moving billboard typre trucks here that drives around town with this stuff on it.

[amber]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Did RS mention that most of them are paid?
Also, we have one of those moving billboard typre trucks here that drives around town with this stuff on it.

They're paid? Ah, but of course, it's a repub theme!

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by amber

They're paid? Ah, but of course, it's a repub theme!

With all due respect, paying protestors is not necessarily limited to political party AND - for many of these people, the R party is FAR too liberal for them. which in and of itself is terrifying

For the sake of Tower I am not detracting from the sliminess of the R party, they seemingly are far worse in every aspect than the just sleazy D's.

[amber]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

With all due respect, paying protestors is not necessarily limited to political party AND - for many of these people, the R party is FAR too liberal for them. which in and of itself is terrifying

For the sake of Tower I am not detracting from the sliminess of the R party, they seemingly are far worse in every aspect than the just sleazy D's.

Yeah, but the Repubs have more money!!!
Sesly, I knew you would say that, but...

[dissention]

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky

Rolling Stone offensive and distasteful? Nah... never.

It's gotten much better as a magazine in the past few months, actually. It used to be utter ****, but they've been surprising me with some of their articles and the discs they choose to review.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by amber

Yeah, but the Repubs have more money!!!
Sesly, I knew you would say that, but...

I know - but your comment implied the R's were the only one doing it and that, as you know, is a pet peeve

[amber]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I know - but your comment implied the R's were the only one doing it and that, as you know, is a pet peeve

I only hear about Repubs being in bed with money in heinous ways about 20-30 times more often, sorry about the, uh, mistatement.

[strandinthewind]

Originally Posted by amber

I only hear about Repubs being in bed with money in heinous ways about 20-30 times more often, sorry about the, uh, mistatement.

Where should we start - perhaps the Clinton give me money and here is your pardon, Clinton's essential sale of the poor's benefits in the "Contract with America," the D's support in the budgets W has passed, and so on and so on. Plus, the D's over the years certainly have bought votes and planted hecklers So, I say although I cannot stand the R moreso, I think the D party is the lesser of two evils.

[dissention]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

the D's support in the budgets W has passed

The very budgets they bitch about 24/7? Surely you jest!

[amber]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Where should we start - perhaps the Clinton give me money and here is your pardon, Clinton's essential sale of the poor's benefits in the "Contract with America," the D's support in the budgets W has passed, and so on and so on. Plus, the D's over the years certainly have bought votes and planted hecklers So, I say although I cannot stand the R moreso, I think the D party is the lesser of two evils.

Yes, I thought we all were already coming from the point of view that the Dems were merely the lesser of two evils. But if you'd like to present evidence to counter my tongue in cheek comment, more power to you!

[irishgrl]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Did RS mention that most of them are paid?
Also, we have one of those moving billboard typre trucks here that drives around town with this stuff on it.

if one of those eejits ever drove by MY house I think I'd have my arsenal of EGGS, ROTTEN TOMATOES, and MUD (with a rock inside!) at the ready! OR a hose set to high power stream pointed RIGHT at the driver....or there's always the offerings of the catbox to hoist at them