Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1
This is from the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune. Most of the article is a rehash of what we've already read, but I don't think I'd seen this little bit before:
By Jon Bream
http://www.startribune.com/entertain...tml?page=2&c=y
Fleetwood Mac's ticket prices have jumped 20 percent from the last tour -- from a top of $125 to $150 this time. Other Rock and Roll Hall of Fame acts, including AC/DC and Bruce Springsteen, are keeping their top prices under $100 in economically challenging 2009.
Can Fleetwood Mac explain the discrepancy?
"We don't do the amount of gigs that, say, a Bruce Springsteen or an AC/DC does," Fleetwood said. "We're doing 46 gigs. We're not doing 250 gigs."
Does that mean that Fleetwood Mac makes more money off a shorter tour than Springsteen or AC/DC do for a longer tour with less expensive tickets?
"I doubt it," Fleetwood said. "It's actually probably the other way around."
Jon Bream • 612-673-1719
|
Good Christ. He should just ask them how much they make and get it over with already. Perhaps there's a place for him on the Fleetwood Mac accounting team.
