Stevie did a Bat Mitzvah

[irishgrl]

Originally Posted by amber

Yeah, no. And I think you are committing that fallacy, actually. You are assuming that because the qualifier "some" was not used, the inference "all" is correct.
I'm not trying to impress anyone. I just think you are wrong. And I think you parsed incorrectly, b/c I did the same thing and had a different conclusion. And if people start thinking that all words have no concrete meaning, and are up for "interpretation" even though the interpretation is something no one ever said, or can even be stretched to intimate that they meant that, well, then, suck balls. To me, it's called "spinning" or "making stuff up" pure and simple. It is a matter of logic. And it's a matter of taking words at their meaning.
Seriously. I don't want to get irritated. Now it's been proven that we will never convince each other. Perhaps we should drop it? Because I also resent the inference that when I really discuss something, and have knowledge about it, that someone thinks I am trying to "impress" them.
And I think what Eliud said was turned into "something it isn't" by anyone who inferred he meant all rich people.

Amber, because you apparently overlooked this pertinent FACT:
you can use one word to talk about a group: Republicans/Democrats, Liberals/Conservatives, Rich/Poor. White/Black etc.... the single word, without a qualifier means the GROUP. It is done all the time. You consistently argue with everything I say and just because it pops out of your mouth or whatever doesnt make you right. I did take his words at their meaning, and this convo PROVES there IS more than one way to interpret words. Apparently your knowledge isnt as extensive as you think it is. much like your vocabulary. Methinks your posting prowess bit into your study time. tsk. Tell you what: you put yer nose in a book and I'll suck balls. I'll even suck spinning balls. Sounds fun.