Please help save the dogs - Page 7

amber · #91 09-20-2007, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carrie721

and because aborted fetuses are really our greatest problem here anyway.

In reality, masses of non aborted fetuses (feti?) are a good chunk of our problem. Which is the opposite of what MLD thinks. Which is ironic, if I may use that word incorrectly. Basically, exactly opposite of what he said is right.

carrie721 · #92 09-20-2007, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

In reality, masses of non aborted fetuses (feti?) are a good chunk of our problem. Which is the opposite of what MLD thinks. Which is ironic, if I may use that word incorrectly. Basically, exactly opposite of what he said is right.

word. i believe it is the great street poet the notorious BIG who said "mo babies, mo problems." amen.

amber · #93 09-20-2007, 06:05 PM

^^^ The worship of vengeful deity Mikeshmike has been usurped by a greater belief in the almighty BIG.

danax6 · #94 09-20-2007, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carrie721

it is the great street poet the notorious BIG

OMG

carrie721 · #95 09-20-2007, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

^^^ The worship of vengeful deity Mikeshmike has been usurped by a greater belief in the almighty BIG.

at least he died

Quote:

Originally Posted by danax6

OMG

what?

danax6 · #96 09-20-2007, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carrie721

what?

Walt Whitman, Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, Yeats, Dickinson and the Notorious BIG.

carrie721 · #97 09-20-2007, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danax6

Walt Whitman, Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, Yeats, Dickinson and the Notorious BIG.

bitch! i said street poet. i don't recall emily dickinson ever coming straight outta compton. or out of her house. ever.

amber · #98 09-20-2007, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carrie721

bitch! i said street poet. i don't recall emily dickinson ever coming straight outta compton. or out of her house. ever.

Right, but if she had, you know bitch woulda kept it real.

bretonbanquet · #99 09-20-2007, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

I have no agenda. I personally feel there's always a huge over-reaction to what I say because I've been labeled this "conservative Christian nutball." If there was any intent, at all, it was merely to get the mind to ponder greater issues. I have said I was more thinking out loud on the matter. In other words...dogs being eaten in other countries seem miniscule in comparison to other issues we face here. The comment wasnt made to bring up my "hidden abortion agenda" to push on all you lefties, mods and libs. (or whatever you want to be called)...but if that is what you want to THINK, then go ahead.

HA! Indeed my friend. indeed.

I think it might just be your unrivalled knack of saying what you think in an incredibly patronising way. Whether you do it on purpose to wind people up, or it's just an unfortunate by-product of your way of typing whatever comes into your head and then not checking it afterwards, it really does result in almost every sentence appearing to be a snide dig at someone's point of view. I really don't think anyone has anything against you personally, but the way you say stuff really does come across badly. Like when you talk about "greater issues".. why is your idea of what constitutes a greater issue more valid than anyone else's? Because it looks like you think that.

carrie721 · #**100** 09-20-2007, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

Right, but if she had, you know bitch woulda kept it real.

i hear she didn't like people playing on her phone.

danax6 · #**101** 09-20-2007, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by carrie721

bitch! i said street poet. i don't recall emily dickinson ever coming straight outta compton. or out of her house. ever.

I know you did. But his name in the same sentence as the words 'great' and 'poet' was enough to get me going.

buckymcnix · #**102** 09-20-2007, 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

I have no agenda. I personally feel there's always a huge over-reaction to what I say because I've been labeled this "conservative Christian nutball."

.

i don't think i over-reacted did i?
i have never labeled or called you a "CCNutball" or anything else for that matter - in fact, i think we have had some decent discussions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

If there was any intent, at all, it was merely to get the mind to ponder greater issues. .

'greater' issues like abortion? that deserves our attention more than the topic of this thread in your opinion. you seem dismissive of others concerns (eating dogs) in light of what you think is important (abortion).

Why bring a divissive issue like abortion into a thread about something that everyone can get behind (animal cruelty)?
And then say that it isn't off topic?
That is an agenda my friend. It's not a bad word.

i know you were just "thinking out loud" but i still can't understand how you can't see why people are taking your statement this way.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

The comment wasnt made to bring up my "hidden abortion agenda" to push on all you lefties, mods and libs. (or whatever you want to be called)...

skip the labels - you can call me bucky, or bill, or rebuckah if we are getting formal.

**mylittledemon** · #**103** 09-20-2007, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trackaghost

Yeah right. Then like Bucky says, why the hell try and bring up obviously controverial issue when this thread was simply to raise awareness for something completely unrelated? But whatever. :rolleyes

Just when I thought you couldn't get more patronising.

I did bring it up, but for it to turn into what it did was not my aim. Somehow that always manages to happen on this board. Everyone gets panties twisted and what not. I've never been told I was patronizing. EVER. Not in person, nor by any of my friends. I dont believe that I am. And I've met plenty of patronizing bastids.

How about we just stamp out anything I've previously said? Maybe can all agree that there ARE greater issues (and when I said greater issues, i meant my OWN mind pondering greater issues...not everyone here...yeah, everyone here has the knack to completely dissect what one says and make it mean something different than intended) that needs more attention than aborting babies, or eating dogs. Like ridding the world of Chris Crocker?

**mylittledemon** · #**104** 09-20-2007, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckymcnix

i don't think i over-reacted did i?
i have never labeled or called you a "CCNutball" or anything else for that matter - in fact, i think we have had some decent discussions.

No, that was Liam. HA!

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckymcnix

'greater' issues like abortion? that deserves our attention more than the topic of this thread in your opinion. you seem dismissive of others concerns (eating dogs) in light of what you think is important (abortion).

Indeed. I did however, comment on watching the video.

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckymcnix

Why bring a divissive issue like abortion into a thread about something that everyone can get behind (animal cruelty)?
And then say that it isn't off topic?
That is an agenda my friend. It's not a bad word.

Well i have no agenda. I've never been to a prolife rally, or picketed outside a clinic. As I said before, I cant stand people that do that. I know i have no agenda. If thats the way it came across, I'm sorry. But there is no agenda. Accept what I've said, and move on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by buckymcnix

Why bring a divissive issue like abortion into a thread about something that everyone can get behind (animal cruelty)?
And then say that it isn't off topic?

Hmm. Well I know a lot of people who dont give 2 ****s about animals. How many people here, or do you know of that have donated to PETA? Hmpf... call me patronizing ...

And I like Rebuckah. =)

**mylittledemon** · #**105** 09-20-2007, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrummerDeanna

I think it'd be more admirable if *someone* would just admit he or she was trying to rile folks.

That has NEVER EVER been my intent on these boards. Those of you that know me know that. Its like when someone asks you "Whats wrong?" "Are you mad?" "Are you ok?" And everything is fine, and it gets irritating. So when people do that to you, that gets annoying right? Same situation here. A certain few say I'm trying to rile, and its simply not true. It seems as though I make simple comments, and they get blown up past what I MEANT them for. I think certain people like the argument that somehow gets created, then blame it on me. I've seen it done in the past with other people on here. They get run off. Not the case with me. I just end up defending myself, playing the martyr, explaining myself...and in the end I suppose it all boils down to the fact that I dont HAVE to explain myself. But I do it because it seems the courteous thing to do. I could just say "BLOW ME" and put an end to it. Would that be the preferred response? We all have discussions and we move on. Maybe thats "riling" in someone else's book, but not mine. I've learned everyone here, including myself, are hard headed as they come. So can we move on to my next "hidden agenda (HA!)"...ridding the world of Chris Crocker!