Quote:
Originally Posted by petep9000
I still believe (though not in my lifetime) that uninterrupted, unimpeded waterfront access will become a reality in NYC now that it is no longer has a 'working' waterfront. There is just too big a demand for it, and too much $$ to be made from waterfront condos, recreation facilities and such. There are dribs and drabs now, and certainly more than there used to be. But, not all of it is easily accessible and some parts still completely closed off. One day, I also see the public housing on the East Side all uprooted and moved to newer developments somewhere further away...and the existing projects converted to tony apartments with waterfront views else torn down and started from scratch. The residents there are a captive audience, NYC's public housing clearly states they have no choice (only a preference) of where their flats will be. I dont advocate this, but I do believe it is not 100% outside the realm of possibility.
|
Well, the waterfront does seem to be pretty accessible today, especially along the Hudson. If anything I'm kinda glad that the highway separates the riverfront parks because it somehow keeps the parks more pristine in a way. On the otherhand, if the waterfront was tied directly to the grid, you know there would be plenty of a$$-hats driving through the park or dumping their garbage (or bodies) there. Or there would be plenty of cops or firefighters with their city parking permits illegally parked everywhere. I love the fact that the waterfront today is strictly pedestrian only and that it truly is for everyone, and not just for the rich.
As for public housing... I seriously doubt the projects in Manhattan will be going away anytime soon. For one thing, there are soooo many units. Secondly, there would be such an incredible backlash against any politico even hinting at the suggestion that these projects should be relocated. And it goes without saying that it smacks of racism and classism, even if that is not the motive.