View Single Post
  #2  
Old 08-30-2011, 02:57 PM
SteveMacD's Avatar
SteveMacD SteveMacD is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 9,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chriskisn View Post
Given most of the fans never accepted this version of FM (I remember the discussions when Time was released and the SN fans really didn't take to Bekka), Dave Mason does have a point. If it wasn't seen as a legitimate lineup or a new Fleetwood Mac, then they were pretty much a cover band or another Elmer Gantry & co.

The fact that Mick and John were there gave the band a bit of credibility but not a lot. If Mick had joined Elmer Gantry, Kirby, etc back in the seventies would that have been enough for them to be the REAL Fleetwood Mac?
Apples and oranges between the Fake Mac and Time. The Fake Mac was trying to pass itself off as Fleetwood Mac. The Time band WAS Fleetwood Mac. Big difference. I really don't see much of a difference between the time band and other transitional versions of the band (Future Games, Penguin, the first Stevie/Lindsey album). The only difference was the scale.

Can we, with a straight face, say that the Time band was MORE radical than when the band went from being Green/Spencer/Kirwan to Kirwan/Welch/McVie in just over a year?
__________________
On and on it will always be, the rhythm, rhyme, and harmony.



THE Stephen Hopkins
Reply With Quote