| louielouie2000 |
06-02-2010 07:13 PM |
Buckingham Nicks had a big back catalogue of music at that point already. They were starting to catch on in the deep South (Alabama). I believe they were working on Buckingham Nicks II when they were asked to join Fleetwood Mac. They would have continued in the music business had they not joined Fleetwood Mac, I'm quite sure. How successful they would have been, that's anybody's guess.
I tend to think it was the combination of the 3 voices, the fantastic rhythm section, and the whole dual couples allure made Fleetwood Mac (and in turn, Buckingham and Nicks) famous. The established Fleetwood Mac name certainly didn't hurt: it was a familiar entity to the public. Obviously Buckingham Nicks only had 2 voices, only 1 couple, and no amazing rhythm section. I just don't think they had the capability to explode on the scene without the backing of Fleetwood Mac.
Everyone around here seems to think Stevie would have made it on her own. I disagree heartily. She was WAY, WAY too raw of a talent. Who would have signed her and taken her under their wing and developed her? She was essentially a failed entity at that point. She could only clank a couple chords on a piano, murder a couple chords on a guitar. She was just one of 10 million other pretty girl singer songwriters around in the '70s. Unlike Carole King, Carly Simon, Joni Mitchell, et al she had no instrumental talents either (except apparently with the skin flute, but I digress... :laugh:). Stevie NEEDED Lindsey Buckingham to develop her talent: to take her 16 minute meandering wanderings and whittle them into viable songs. She needed the backing of the Fleetwood Mac name, and the major record label deal they had. Sorry guys, Stevie wouldn't have made it without Fleetwood Mac. :wavey:
|