The Ledge

The Ledge (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Is it just me? (http://ledge.fleetwoodmac.net/showthread.php?t=26677)

Jyqm 05-06-2006 12:03 PM

Is it just me?
 
Given all this hub-bub over a potential "private Stevie party/concert" in the Nicks forum, I begin to wonder:

Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

Is there anybody else who's just kind of scratching their head in amazement at this?

bikerchic 05-06-2006 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Given all this hub-bub over a potential "private Stevie party/concert" in the Nicks forum, I begin to wonder:

Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

Is there anybody else who's just kind of scratching their head in amazement at this?

No. I think it's just you :laugh: People need to do what makes them happy and if this is it, then go for it! I'm seriously considering it.

estranged4life 05-06-2006 12:29 PM

You're not the only one...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Given all this hub-bub over a potential "private Stevie party/concert" in the Nicks forum, I begin to wonder:

Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

Is there anybody else who's just kind of scratching their head in amazement at this?

I couldnt bring myself to attend any event such as the "private Stevie party/concert". Even if they are able to pull this off, I still wouldnt want to attend.

The days of spending over $100 for any concert event has ended for this boy, Once the chances of a full blown Pink Floyd reunion were killed there went the chance to spend $$$ for a show. Will I see Fleetwood Mac/Stevie Nicks/whoever related to FM solo-wise in person in the future? Maybe, Depends if any Ledgies attend and if I could find a decent ticket for about $65 maximum price...Otherwise I would probably "mail it in" and wait for the bootlegs (ala Stevie Nicks Dallas 2005 show)

So as I said, you're not the only one.

Jyqm 05-06-2006 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by estranged4life
I couldnt bring myself to attend any event such as the "private Stevie party/concert". Even if they are able to pull this off, I still wouldnt want to attend.

The days of spending over $100 for any concert event has ended for this boy, Once the chances of a full blown Pink Floyd reunion were killed there went the chance to spend $$$ for a show. Will I see Fleetwood Mac/Stevie Nicks/whoever related to FM solo-wise in person in the future? Maybe, Depends if any Ledgies attend and if I could find a decent ticket for about $65 maximum price...Otherwise I would probably "mail it in" and wait for the bootlegs (ala Stevie Nicks Dallas 2005 show)

So as I said, you're not the only one.

We've got about the same price cut-offs, Brian. I'm sure in several years as the price of everything keeps going up, I'll eventually end up paying $100 for some concert or other, but at the moment, no way.

$65-75 is about my Fleetwood Mac cut-off, too. Fortunately, I got to attend the Milwaukee Summerfest show on the Say You Will tour, and a lawn seat for that was quite cheap, well under $50, if I remember. Of course, the lawn was packed and I was way out in the back, but I don't especially care about watching Lindsey and Stevie's choreographed hugs and such, so it worked out rather nicely.

irishgrl 05-06-2006 01:40 PM

tsk tsk Jyqm, such a cynic :rolleyes:

estranged4life 05-06-2006 01:50 PM

I saw...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
We've got about the same price cut-offs, Brian. I'm sure in several years as the price of everything keeps going up, I'll eventually end up paying $100 for some concert or other, but at the moment, no way.

$65-75 is about my Fleetwood Mac cut-off, too. Fortunately, I got to attend the Milwaukee Summerfest show on the Say You Will tour, and a lawn seat for that was quite cheap, well under $50, if I remember. Of course, the lawn was packed and I was way out in the back, but I don't especially care about watching Lindsey and Stevie's choreographed hugs and such, so it worked out rather nicely.

Paul McCartney, The Rolling Stones/Ryan Adams & Keith Urban all for under $62.50 a ticket with each having a great seat (Keith Urban was $31 a ticket through Deb's fanclub membership in the KU fanclub) but Fleetwood Mac was ticket prices of $125, $75 & $80 (The $75 was a ticket a Ledgie was selling on eBay, Still a great seat near the stage). The $125 ticket was worth it to me at that time, Since it was FM's first trip back to OK in over 20+ years...but would I do that now, realistically "No".

But nowadays with our family medical costs (After receiving my MRI results yesterday it will get much worse before it gets better) I cannot afford to see any shows out of state as I did in the past, nor can I afford any tickets over my $65 price limit. I attend most shows by myself, There has only been 4 concerts where both Deb & myslef have attended: Keith Urban Sept.2001 ($7 ticket-We sat front row), Paul McCartney Oct.2002, Tim McGraw 2003 (Free tickets) & Keith Urban March 10,2005. Deb was more into those shows than me excluding the McCartney show since I am the Beatles freak in this family (She's a country gal).


Hell, Been to so many concerts in my life that the live in concert stigma has won off to me. Only band I would like to see now is Pink Floyd, but realistically that wont be happening anytime soon...However I would still like to see Nevermore, In Flames & Evergrey on May 25 in Tulsa (Cain's Ballroom-The best concert venue is the USofA. I mean they have EVERYONE from every style of music playing there nowadays), But with this cyst in my brain, If I were to hardcore headbang I could rupture it and hemorrage, So I will sadly pass on that show (Which sucks cause I dig Nevermore!!!)

amber 05-06-2006 01:59 PM

If I were rich, or even middle class (:laugh: ) I'd go to all kinds of stupid sh*t. No, that's not true. But I would go to this thing. I mean, if I don't care about the money, why not go? If I didn't have to think about money at all, it would be just another random lark with my favorite singer, another excuse to spend mounds of my theoretical cash on something frivolous and adventuresome.

However, at my current rate of earnage, I would "never" go.

But there are other things I would "never" do. For instance, amassing collections of DVD's. I'm not going to watch them again, and I don't understand why people do. With a few exceptions, of course - there are a few movies I've watched more than once.

Brwn_eyes0511 05-06-2006 02:02 PM

I would if it were say...

Liza Minnelli
Mariah Carey
Amy Grant
Faith Hill
Liz Phair


But for Stevie.. eh..

Richard B 05-06-2006 02:21 PM

Had it been Stevie Nicks say 1981-1983, I'd go and I'd pay $1,000. As it is now, no way. I also find it rude that people expect to create her set list. It's fun to dream I guess, but damn, Stevie is gonna sing whatever she wants. Besides I have had enough Stevie encounters that do not make this very exciting, not to mention my disdain for Las Vegas.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amber
For instance, amassing collections of DVD's. I'm not going to watch them again, and I don't understand why people do.

I have a huge DVD collection. Like my books, it's nice to have on hand when friends wish to view. Also, I'm in the film industry so when I watch a film I look at many different aspects of the film: acting, directing, writing, lighting, sound, etc. So it goes deeper for me when I view a film, even repeatedly.

Sometimes it's just for a feeling. Certain films can lift my sprirts, make me think about things. I also re-read books, I listen to CD's repeatedly. Same differences really.

David 05-06-2006 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

If it were the wild heart tour, I'd be all over it.

My mind don't boggle at the $350 cost either -- oh my god, considering what I spent on tours like the tusk & mirage tours as well as the wild heart & rock a little. I kept my broker in champagne & caviar in those days.

amber 05-06-2006 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard B
Had it been Stevie Nicks say 1981-1983, I'd go and I'd pay $1,000. As it is now, no way. I also find it rude that people expect to create her set list. It's fun to dream I guess, but damn, Stevie is gonna sing whatever she wants. Besides I have had enough Stevie encounters that do not make this very exciting, not to mention my disdain for Las Vegas.



I have a huge DVD collection. Like my books, it's nice to have on hand when friends wish to view. Also, I'm in the film industry so when I watch a film I look at many different aspects of the film: acting, directing, writing, lighting, sound, etc. So it goes deeper for me when I view a film, even repeatedly.

Sometimes it's just for a feeling. Certain films can lift my sprirts, make me think about things. I also re-read books, I listen to CD's repeatedly. Same differences really.

That makes sense, I guess. I have a lot of books, and I do read them again. So, since i do that, I guess I'm obligated to understand why people watch movies over and over. What with your "I'm in the industry" thing it makes even more sense. Also, I guess I don't really view films with my friends much. Also, I like to spend money on things to eat and wear and decorate with. :laugh:

trackaghost 05-06-2006 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Given all this hub-bub over a potential "private Stevie party/concert" in the Nicks forum, I begin to wonder:

Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

Is there anybody else who's just kind of scratching their head in amazement at this?

If Stevie announced a London date at, say, the Shepherd's Bush Empire, I would definitely pay $350 (about £190) for that, although I've never paid that much for a gig. But I do know kinda what you mean. The meet and greet stuff and the whole 'we can get Stevie to play what we want' is a bit over the top. I don't know, If I were Stevie I personally wouldn't want to do it. Meeting a few fans at a charity bash or after a show is one thing. Being expected to meet everyone in a Stevie-obsessed audience is another.
I'm not sure I like the idea that she's for hire either, like a wedding band or a party clown...

Jyqm 05-06-2006 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishgrl
tsk tsk Jyqm, such a cynic

I'm not being cynical, I'm just being cheap! Also, the whole thing is just very far away from the way I relate to music/performers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
But there are other things I would "never" do. For instance, amassing collections of DVD's. I'm not going to watch them again, and I don't understand why people do. With a few exceptions, of course - there are a few movies I've watched more than once.

I don't think I'll amass a huge collection of movie DVDs, although television shows and concerts are another animal. Those are things I would watch enough repeatedly to justify owning DVDs.

That said, while I doubt I'll ever own tons of movies on DVD, it sure is nice to have friends who do...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard B
I also find it rude that people expect to create her set list. It's fun to dream I guess, but damn, Stevie is gonna sing whatever she wants.

I find the commodification aspect of this whole thing so fascinating! It's like everybody wants to purchase Stevie for a day and set her up in the corner and make her do certain things. "Make sure she sings 'Bella Donna!' Also she should twirl at least ten times, and I want to shake her hand and have her tell me how much she appreciates that I'm such a big fan!" She's not even a person, she's this mystical relic that everybody just wants to be in the same room with for a couple of hours. It's so interesting. Celebrity worship just intrigues the hell out of me.

Quote:

I'm not sure I like the idea that she's for hire either, like a wedding band or a party clown...
But a party clown that everyone worships!

(I agree with you, though, if I were Stevie, I wouldn't go anywhere near this kind of thing. Actually, I think I'd feel kind of ashamed to do it.)

amber 05-06-2006 03:40 PM

I don't understand the big diff of who books her for a concert. :confused: Either way she's getting paid, and either way she's singing for people. It's still just a concert, I don't really get the thing of being a party clown, or whatever. I mean, we already know that if you have enough money to book her, she'll play a concert. And isn't that how it always is? At least in this case she'll be playing for uber fans. A professional arena booker has to fulfill the same requirements to book Stevie as a regular person does, I would think.
Also, people always complain about her setlist, of course they will do the same here, and wish for more variety. If someone actually thinks they can control her setlist, that's another story, but no harm in talking about her mixing it up. It's not like Stevie has to do what anyone says.
Commodification? Well, people pay to hear her sing, so she is a commodity. At least her singing is. That's mainly what I care about.

Jyqm 05-06-2006 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
I don't understand the big diff of who books her for a concert. :confused: Either way she's getting paid, and either way she's singing for people. It's still just a concert, I don't really get the thing of being a party clown, or whatever. I mean, we already know that if you have enough money to book her, she'll play a concert. And isn't that how it always is?

How it always is for Stevie, or how it always is, period? There are lots of artists who don't play private or corporate gigs.

amber 05-06-2006 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
How it always is for Stevie, or how it always is, period? There are lots of artists who don't play private or corporate gigs.

Well...Stevie. And a lot of other performers. Who books for artists who don't play private or corporate gigs? Where do they play? I mean, if they randomly play at some small club, that is still a booking, someone had to set it up. There are still fans at the venue who want to hear that person play.
Also, as far as this thing goes, with the number of tickets being offered, it is like a regular concert. There is no meet and greet.
I just don't have that snobbishness of where people play, or whatever. Stevie likes to sing, she likes to get paid for it - singing is her job.

Jyqm 05-06-2006 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Well...Stevie. And a lot of other performers. Who books for artists who don't play private or corporate gigs? Where do they play? I mean, if they randomly play at some small club, that is still a booking, someone had to set it up. There are still fans at the venue who want to hear that person play.

Well, with most "regular" (that is, non-private, non-corporate) gigs, artists book themselves. It's not a like a venue just calls up an artist and says, "Hey, will you play a show here?" The artist decides that they're going to tour, and then they book dates and venues based on what's available and what they want.

In a corporate gig, the power roles are reversed. The corporation says, "Hey, we'll pay you this much money, come do what we want," and the artist says, "Okay." It's just a question of how much control you have over your art and how you're "distributing" it.

Quote:

I just don't have that snobbishness of where people play, or whatever.
You sure "snobbishness" is the right word for people who are somewhat put off by the idea of people paying hundreds of dollars to go to a private Stevie event?

amber 05-06-2006 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Well, with most "regular" (that is, non-private, non-corporate) gigs, artists book themselves. It's not a like a venue just calls up an artist and says, "Hey, will you play a show here?" The artist decides that they're going to tour, and then they book dates and venues based on what's available and what they want.

In a corporate gig, the power roles are reversed. The corporation says, "Hey, we'll pay you this much money, come do what we want," and the artist says, "Okay." It's just a question of how much control you have over your art and how you're "distributing" it.

Yeah, I see what the difference is now. But I don't get the big deal. Also, doesn't the venue in the "regular" gig scenario still have to want the band to play?
I just assumed with the whole corporate gig thing, that Stevie, or other artists, would still have the freedom to say they didn't want to do it. Also, even when Stevie played that party, she didn't have to do what they wanted, specifically with her setlist, did she? Or on the SYW tour? :shrug:
Am I wrong? So in that way the corporate/private gig doesn't have control over the artist.
I worked for this smallish bar/restaurant who has live music every night, their downstairs is a "club" area. But we had a booking agent, and acts would send him...demos, I guess, or finished CD's or whatever, and then he would decide and try to book them.


Quote:

Originally Posted by quim
You sure "snobbishness" is the right word for people who are somewhat put off by the idea of people paying hundreds of dollars to go to a private Stevie event?

No, I was referring to people caring specifically about where artists play, like some venues/situations are not good enough for the artist. Not the cost of going to a private event. :)

Serrart 05-06-2006 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Given all this hub-bub over a potential "private Stevie party/concert" in the Nicks forum, I begin to wonder:

Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event? Regardless of whether or not it's Stevie Nicks or the pope or Jimi Hendrix back from the dead, or whether I got to hand-pick the setlist, or whether I got to shake her hand or have her sign my ass... I just don't think I would ever even want to go to this kind of event, particularly at such a cost ($350 is the price being quoted for this particular Stevie party idea).

Is there anybody else who's just kind of scratching their head in amazement at this?

If I wasn't on another continent, I'd go in a flash. :nod:

Romy

DrummerDeanna 05-06-2006 04:53 PM

Nah - as much as I love Stevie I'd never pay that much money to go to something like that. There are several reasons. It seems that (and I'm not talking about the majority of the people here ;) ) that a lot of the crazies come out....

And there are a lot of crazies...in fact my first thought upon seeing the private party thing was, "oh that poor woman...does she know what she's getting herself into?"

And I wouldn't want to meet Stevie for a split second while there are bunches of other crazed fans around.

Plus I have this ideal of who/what Stevie is in my head. It's almost guaranteed not to be accurate as it's put together on what she portrays in public -and well, I don't want that image/ideal messed with.

AND with my luck I'd catch her on the ****tiest day of her life and she'd be a complete bear and I'd be crushed. I've already been front-row-hand-shake-snubbed by Stevie twice...I don't need to be snubbed after paying upwards of 300 bucks :o

Johnny Stew 05-06-2006 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511
I would if it were....

Wow, you didn't even say you would if it were Christine McVie! :shocked:

Red 05-06-2006 06:18 PM

Yeah I can't do it, I'm travelling too much this year, just bought a condo a few months ago, saw Stevie in Vegas last year, know I'll be seeing a couple FM 2007 shows AND I'm still holding out for a solo Lindsey tour. If it wasn't for all that, I'd SO be there.:laugh:

Jyqm 05-06-2006 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Yeah, I see what the difference is now. But I don't get the big deal. Also, doesn't the venue in the "regular" gig scenario still have to want the band to play?

Well, the venue has to allow the band to play. There's no question that any venue wants to have people performing or doing something there. That's how they make money. It's just a question of whether the space is available when the artist is.

Quote:

I just assumed with the whole corporate gig thing, that Stevie, or other artists, would still have the freedom to say they didn't want to do it.
Well of course, nobody has to accept the big wad of cash thrown at them to play a private party.

Quote:

Also, even when Stevie played that party, she didn't have to do what they wanted, specifically with her setlist, did she? Or on the SYW tour? :shrug:
Am I wrong? So in that way the corporate/private gig doesn't have control over the artist.
Well, I doubt any corporation would feel the need to tell Stevie what to play. She's already going to play everything they want to hear without them asking her to. But when you're being hired by someone to perform a show for them and they're throwing around big cash, you do what they want. I don't doubt that many corporate booking agents remind the people they hire to play their hits.

Quote:

I worked for this smallish bar/restaurant who has live music every night, their downstairs is a "club" area. But we had a booking agent, and acts would send him...demos, I guess, or finished CD's or whatever, and then he would decide and try to book them.
Sure, and these are a bunch of no-name local bands nobody's ever heard of, right? That's just how it has to go most of the time when you're starting out, that's what you have to do, you're trying to sell yourself, trying to get to a point where you don't have to sell yourself anymore, where you've got the money and the power to do what you want, to play the music that you want, to make the art that you want. Assuming that the art of it is what's most important to you, anyway. With Stevie that doesn't necessarily seem to be the case these days. She's still selling herself, because she thinks she'll make too little money or become less famous if she doesn't.

Quote:

No, I was referring to people caring specifically about where artists play, like some venues/situations are not good enough for the artist. Not the cost of going to a private event. :)
Gotcha. Although I don't think the concern is that a private party "isn't good enough" for Stevie, but rather that it's a little strange the way some people seem to be viewing her as a commodity to be bought and told what to do, and treating her as a party clown in that respect.

But as far playing corporate gigs and such, I'll say that I think an artist is as good and as respectable as the ways that they choose to showcase their art. I have more respect for a musician who doesn't play corporate events, because it shows that they have more respect for their art as art, as opposed to commerce, and for themselves as an artist, as opposed to a commodity. And of course art and commerce are always intertwined in this world, but it's a spectrum, and some people keep their art more beholden to commerce than others.

Johnny Stew 05-06-2006 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
But as far playing corporate gigs and such, I'll say that I think an artist is as good and as respectable as the ways that they choose to showcase their art. I have more respect for a musician who doesn't play corporate events, because it shows that they have more respect for their art as art, as opposed to commerce, and for themselves as an artist, as opposed to a commodity. And of course art and commerce are always intertwined in this world, but it's a spectrum, and some people keep their art more beholden to commerce than others.

I think Stevie just wants to work, period. I can't remember if it was Mick or Sharon (or Dick Van Patten), but someone said that when Stevie isn't working, she feels worthless.

I'm sure that, to her, a gig is a gig, and as long as people are enjoying the show it doesn't matter if they're diehard fans or businessmen.

irishgrl 05-06-2006 08:56 PM

Quote:

I'm not being cynical, I'm just being cheap!
aaaahhhhh thats different! cheap, I understand! I cant afford todays concert prices either! for that matter, I couldnt afford YESTERDAY'S concert prices!

irishgrl 05-06-2006 08:58 PM

Stewie, General Zod, that sounds familiar....what movie is that from? wasnt it a futuristic kind of movie? (GAD! experiencing brain farts!) I seem to recall the movie trailer showing a spiked metal ball traveling along in mid-air without any help onward toward an unknown destination.....sorry thats all I recall, but I could be WAAAAY off here)

Edit: I AM way off, I just did a search and Zod is from Superman. Ok.
but now I want to know what movie it was that had that damn spiked ball zooming thru the air toward a distant target...???

David 05-06-2006 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Although I don't think the concern is that a private party "isn't good enough" for Stevie, but rather that it's a little strange the way some people seem to be viewing her as a commodity to be bought and told what to do, and treating her as a party clown in that respect.

It seems a little weird for fans to be able to "summon up" Stevie so that she appears at their bidding. It seems un-Stevielike. She is too mysterious, too mystical--she rules her life like a bird in flight, after all--to be "summoned" by any party but Clear Channel or Bill Clinton.

That's what's weird about it. The mystique of Stevie, the allure of Stevie are deflated when a bunch of fans can just throw down some cash & make her appear in person. :eek:

It's weird, man .... it's weird ....

sparky 05-06-2006 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
That's what's weird about it. The mystique of Stevie, the allure of Stevie are deflated when a bunch of fans can just throw down some cash & make her appear in person. :eek:

It's weird, man .... it's weird ....

Get on the phone, make an order, pay, and get the goods.

She's like pizza.

Except she won't be delivered to your door in 20 minutes, and the best you can count on is side door delivery. That is, if you have the proper performance space in your house.

dissention 05-06-2006 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
Am I the only one here who simply would never go to such an event?

No. It's a waste of money to me and no different than seeing a performer on tour other than the higher price tag involved. Wow, she's going to be in a smaller room. Big whoop. That $350 is a third of my rent. Why would I want to pay that much to see anyone, especially someone who tours constantly with the same damned show? Granted, I'm not nearly the fan I used to be, but even if I still was, I wouldn't hesitate to laugh at the idea of dropping that kind of steak for one measly concert.

amber 05-07-2006 02:14 AM

Jyqm
 
I see your points. I think I have a different take on what you call commodification. I think of it in a less negative connotation in regards to Stevie. I think of it more literally - her voice is a commodity, meaning it is how she makes her money, and the same for all artists.
I see your point about how artists can choose who to work for and that some artists choose who they play for in ways that meet your particular standards, perhaps ways that you perceive to have more integrity. I get that. I don't like to see people I like playing fairs, and like that. But I rarely think the worse of the artist to the degree that you seem to. I try to find out the circumstances of why they are doing that, and I usually see the point - they need the money.
With artists that seem to have enough money, my judgment of them "cheapening" their work does get more stringent.

Then there is the other factor:
I think Stevie loves to sing, has Stevie ever stopped working? Not really. and copy here what Johnny Stew said in his post.

And I think the fact that Stevie likes to work, combined with a mid size fan only event (who wouldn't want to play in front of a bunch of people who are very passionate about their work? In fact, it is everything a performer does want. Am I wrong? ) combined with meeting her contractual fee, which is hardly venue slumming level, or creative freedom constricting - It's a recipe for the OPPOSITE OF A DISASTER! :laugh:

My biggest boo hoo hoo is would that she would grab hold of her opportunity for creative freedom. If she ever had the biggest, fattest, juiciest, hanging change up pitch right up the middle to hit out of the fricking park, this is it.
and that, my friends -

THAT -

would make or break an on the fence financial decision for me (theoretically).
But I'd definitely urge everyone who could to buy the initial ticket if they can - then you can just decide later if it will be worth the airfair and accomodations. It's very simple, really. :woohoo:

And who knows, maybe the lady will swing at this one. :cool:

chiliD 05-07-2006 03:22 AM

I would...if the stipulation was that she couldn't sing any song that she's already sung in the past...all new material or new covers she's not sung in public. Now THAT would make it a "special" show.

But, kudos to those who apparently have "made it happen".

seeker007nmss 05-07-2006 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrummerDeanna
Nah - as much as I love Stevie I'd never pay that much money to go to something like that. There are several reasons. It seems that (and I'm not talking about the majority of the people here ;) ) that a lot of the crazies come out....

And there are a lot of crazies...in fact my first thought upon seeing the private party thing was, "oh that poor woman...does she know what she's getting herself into?"

And I wouldn't want to meet Stevie for a split second while there are bunches of other crazed fans around.

Plus I have this ideal of who/what Stevie is in my head. It's almost guaranteed not to be accurate as it's put together on what she portrays in public -and well, I don't want that image/ideal messed with.

AND with my luck I'd catch her on the ****tiest day of her life and she'd be a complete bear and I'd be crushed. I've already been front-row-hand-shake-snubbed by Stevie twice...I don't need to be snubbed after paying upwards of 300 bucks :o


I agree, and with the seating arrangements I get the image of a certain WHO concert from a few years back. :shocked:

Jyqm 05-07-2006 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
I see your points. I think I have a different take on what you call commodification. I think of it in a less negative connotation in regards to Stevie. I think of it more literally - her voice is a commodity, meaning it is how she makes her money, and the same for all artists.

I agree completely, obviously the work that any performer creates, along with their talents in performing it, is a commodity that they hope to make money from. But come on. What's being commodified here is not Stevie's voice. The idea for this kind of party does not spring from a desire simply to hear Stevie's voice or songs.

How many people responded immediately to the suggestion of this party with, "Will there be a meet & greet?!?!?!"

Quote:

I see your point about how artists can choose who to work for and that some artists choose who they play for in ways that meet your particular standards, perhaps ways that you perceive to have more integrity. I get that. I don't like to see people I like playing fairs, and like that. But I rarely think the worse of the artist to the degree that you seem to.
To be clear, I don't think worse of artists who do this kind of thing. I just think better of those who choose not to. That may seem like semantics, but it's not like I think Stevie is some horrible person for playing corporate gigs. She can do what she wants, of course. But what she does does say something about the way she views her art and herself as an artist, and I simply have more respect for people who take a different path. But having more respect for those people doesn't mean I have less respect for Stevie. Does that make sense?

Quote:

I try to find out the circumstances of why they are doing that, and I usually see the point - they need the money.
I agree, and I always understand that... but do you really think Stevie "needs the money?" From all accounts, she lives pretty extravagantly.

Quote:

(who wouldn't want to play in front of a bunch of people who are very passionate about their work? In fact, it is everything a performer does want. Am I wrong? )
I don't know, man, have you seen some of these Stevie fans?

Quote:

My biggest boo hoo hoo is would that she would grab hold of her opportunity for creative freedom. If she ever had the biggest, fattest, juiciest, hanging change up pitch right up the middle to hit out of the fricking park, this is it.
My biggest boo hoo hoo, not to beat this dead horse again, is that she already has that opportunity for creative freedom. She's a popular rock star with millions of dollars and a big loyal fan base who will follow her to the ends of the earth no matter what. And yet, as I said before, she's still trying to sell herself. Because she thinks that she needs to sell out arenas, and she thinks that the only way she can do that is by playing the same hits over and over again, because otherwise that guy in the fifteenth row with the pretzel in his hand and the beer belly straining against his Pat Benatar T-shirt who only knows the words "Rhiannon" and "ooh baby ooh said ooh" might not show up next time.

I know I always use Bruce Springsteen as an example against Stevie/Fleetwood Mac, but, well: Look at Springsteen this year. He's on the road with friggin' jug band, touring behind an album of old folk and gospel songs. Why? Because he can! Because he feels like it! Why not! He can do whatever he wants, he's still got enough loyal fans who will hop along for the ride, and he's still got millions of dollars. And so does Stevie. If Springsteen can fill sheds doing grade school sing-a-longs of "Old Dan Tucker" and "Jacob's Ladder," I'm pretty Stevie could pack 'em playing "Bella Donna" or "Storms" or whatever else.

Personally, I think if Stevie uses the opportunity of this fan party to play a bunch of great songs that she'll never do again at a "real" concert, I'll be pretty turned off, maybe even disgusted. To me, that says: "Sorry, dedicated fans who have been supporting my career for decades. I know that I tour all the time at kinda-sorta reasonable prices, and I know that you go to all of those shows hoping I'll throw out some surprises for you, but tough ****. You wanna hear the good stuff, you gotta pony up the big bucks, and we'll go into this little back room where the rest of the world won't hear, and it'll be just for you, extra special. $350 extra special." And I know, most of you don't care, Stevie's demographic is one that isn't really turned off by the subtext of such things, you've got the money, if she won't deliver the goods at a normal concert, why not just buy her for an evening and pull the strings yourselves with your wallets. And that's fine, really, if this event comes off, and Stevie comes and plays a bunch of obscure chestnuts, I sincerely hope you all have a really wonderful time and really enjoy yourselves. But I think that kinda sucks. I think that kinda sucks a lot.

GODDESS6 05-07-2006 09:19 AM

don't think they'll (7 wonders) pull it off, & i wouldn't go~ 350.00 for them to determine where i sit...i don't think so, this girl wrks hard for her money & tho i am not above spending, matter of fact i love spending it... hell you can't take it w/ ya~ but because of where this all derived from ( & i don't mean the ledge, i LUV you guys), count me out~

gldstwmn 05-07-2006 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
Also, doesn't the venue in the "regular" gig scenario still have to want the band to play?

Yes. That's what the talent buyers are for.

amber 05-07-2006 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
I agree completely, obviously the work that any performer creates, along with their talents in performing it, is a commodity that they hope to make money from. But come on. What's being commodified here is not Stevie's voice. The idea for this kind of party does not spring from a desire simply to hear Stevie's voice or songs.

How many people responded immediately to the suggestion of this party with, "Will there be a meet & greet?!?!?!"



To be clear, I don't think worse of artists who do this kind of thing. I just think better of those who choose not to. That may seem like semantics, but it's not like I think Stevie is some horrible person for playing corporate gigs. She can do what she wants, of course. But what she does does say something about the way she views her art and herself as an artist, and I simply have more respect for people who take a different path. But having more respect for those people doesn't mean I have less respect for Stevie. Does that make sense?



I agree, and I always understand that... but do you really think Stevie "needs the money?" From all accounts, she lives pretty extravagantly.



I don't know, man, have you seen some of these Stevie fans?



My biggest boo hoo hoo, not to beat this dead horse again, is that she already has that opportunity for creative freedom. She's a popular rock star with millions of dollars and a big loyal fan base who will follow her to the ends of the earth no matter what. And yet, as I said before, she's still trying to sell herself. Because she thinks that she needs to sell out arenas, and she thinks that the only way she can do that is by playing the same hits over and over again, because otherwise that guy in the fifteenth row with the pretzel in his hand and the beer belly straining against his Pat Benatar T-shirt who only knows the words "Rhiannon" and "ooh baby ooh said ooh" might not show up next time.

I know I always use Bruce Springsteen as an example against Stevie/Fleetwood Mac, but, well: Look at Springsteen this year. He's on the road with friggin' jug band, touring behind an album of old folk and gospel songs. Why? Because he can! Because he feels like it! Why not! He can do whatever he wants, he's still got enough loyal fans who will hop along for the ride, and he's still got millions of dollars. And so does Stevie. If Springsteen can fill sheds doing grade school sing-a-longs of "Old Dan Tucker" and "Jacob's Ladder," I'm pretty Stevie could pack 'em playing "Bella Donna" or "Storms" or whatever else.

Personally, I think if Stevie uses the opportunity of this fan party to play a bunch of great songs that she'll never do again at a "real" concert, I'll be pretty turned off, maybe even disgusted. To me, that says: "Sorry, dedicated fans who have been supporting my career for decades. I know that I tour all the time at kinda-sorta reasonable prices, and I know that you go to all of those shows hoping I'll throw out some surprises for you, but tough ****. You wanna hear the good stuff, you gotta pony up the big bucks, and we'll go into this little back room where the rest of the world won't hear, and it'll be just for you, extra special. $350 extra special." And I know, most of you don't care, Stevie's demographic is one that isn't really turned off by the subtext of such things, you've got the money, if she won't deliver the goods at a normal concert, why not just buy her for an evening and pull the strings yourselves with your wallets. And that's fine, really, if this event comes off, and Stevie comes and plays a bunch of obscure chestnuts, I sincerely hope you all have a really wonderful time and really enjoy yourselves. But I think that kinda sucks. I think that kinda sucks a lot.

well, what can I say? Those are good points. I mean, I don't know Stevie's mindset for what she does.
As far as the "meet and greet" thing - I guess people did say that, but she does that at the AHI thing. Perhaps some people do think of her that way, and so I would see your point with that. Although I think they love her the same just for her music and performances, I guess it's just that natural thing of wanting to meet someone who means so much to you. Would I like a meet and greet with Stevie? Sure, but I don't really think of it because it seems impossible. I love Stevie's voice, I love to hear her sing. I've also had a lot of fun meeting other fans.
I couldn't say whether an idea for a party springs only from the desire to hear Stevie sing or not - Brian went forward with it knowing there would be no meet and greet. :shrug: People bought tickets knowing there would be no meet and greet. I'm a little leery of thinking I totally know other people's motivations.
I'm glad you don't respect Stevie less, but sometimes it really sounds like you do, honestly. But if you say you don't, I guess I have to take your word.

Yes, I have seen some of the fans. :laugh: Wherever I've been, most actually seem pretty normal. And then there are a few "others".:shocked: :laugh:

Also, Stevie does live extravagently, and perhaps supports a few more people? That's why I said "seems" to be wealthy. I hope she's got a buttload of money, but sometimes people who spend so extravagently have to keep it coming in. So although we think Stevie has oodles of cash to spare, that may not actually be the case. I'm just saying it's a possibility. Remember how Catherine Denueve is all bankrupt and has to do commercials and stuff?

David 05-07-2006 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jyqm
I know I always use Bruce Springsteen as an example against Stevie/Fleetwood Mac, but, well: Look at Springsteen this year. He's on the road with friggin' jug band, touring behind an album of old folk and gospel songs. Why? Because he can! Because he feels like it! Why not! He can do whatever he wants, he's still got enough loyal fans who will hop along for the ride, and he's still got millions of dollars. And so does Stevie. If Springsteen can fill sheds doing grade school sing-a-longs of "Old Dan Tucker" and "Jacob's Ladder," I'm pretty Stevie could pack 'em playing "Bella Donna" or "Storms" or whatever else.

really?? how cool! I'd like to see that. That's the sort of thing I wish fleetwood mac had been doing since the '80s: just being a sort of austin city limits folk act---or doing peter paul & mary-type shows.
Quote:

And that's fine, really, if this event comes off, and Stevie comes and plays a bunch of obscure chestnuts, I sincerely hope you all have a really wonderful time and really enjoy yourselves.
stevie doesn't have that kind of personality. I don't think the idea would even occur to her, or if it did, she would immediately dismiss it from her mind as being "unrealistic" or "impossible" or "suicidal."

Jyqm 05-07-2006 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
really?? how cool! I'd like to see that. That's the sort of thing I wish fleetwood mac had been doing since the '80s: just being a sort of austin city limits folk act---or doing peter paul & mary-type shows.

He's playing a couple of dates in California, you should go! His show at the Greek in LA sold out, I believe, although I bet tickets will be available for cheap in the parking lot the day of the show. He's also playing the Concord Pavilion in San Francisco; those tickets go on sale tomorrow morning.

I hope he does play Austin City Limits, if he extends the tour into the latter half of the summer. This is music that really ought to be played at festivals and fairs. It's a shame he's not doing Bonnaroo. He closed out the first weekend of the New Orleans Jass & Heritage Festival last week, though, and the reviews were pretty raving. Apparently, he's just having a ton of fun doing this, hitting the road with an 18-piece band, all horns and violins and banjos and stuff, and hosting a two-hour hootenanny everywhere he goes.

amber 05-07-2006 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David
stevie doesn't have that kind of personality. I don't think the idea would even occur to her, or if it did, she would immediately dismiss it from her mind as being "unrealistic" or "impossible" or "suicidal."

Didn't she once have that kind of personality? Is it really impossible? Where's her inflated self esteem? Where's her diva sense of entitlement? Where's her "I am a Rock Star" chutzpah? Her Gemininian desire for infinite variety? That part of her personality that allowed her to compare herself to Bob Dylan?! That girl that flung herself around the stage singing "you're eyes got me dreamin'!" with not a care in the world? The girl who thought not a whit of excessive displays of personality and drug induced performance?
That's what we need now!
It's got to be in there somewhere!!!!!

Jyqm 05-07-2006 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber
I'm glad you don't respect Stevie less, but sometimes it really sounds like you do, honestly. But if you say you don't, I guess I have to take your word.

It's tough love - Stevie and the rest of them. I see that they still have the potential for greatness, and it pisses me off when they so often settle for mediocrity.

Quote:

Didn't she once have that kind of personality? Is it really impossible? Where's her high self esteem? Where's her diva sense of entitlement? Where's her "I am a Rock Star" chutzpah? Her Gemininian desire for infinite variety? That part of her personality that allowed her to compare herself to Bob Dylan?! That girl that flung herself around the stage singing "you're eyes got me dreamin'!" with not a care in the world?
That's what we need now!
It's got to be in there somewhere!!!!!
All great questions. I have to admit, it really baffles me, which is why I often sound so frustrated with the woman. Where is that "I'm a rock star!" self-esteem and bravado?

I suppose that's the interesting flipside to the power trip. She feels like she's got this rock star clout and power, and now that she's got it and has had it for so long, she's deathly afraid of losing it. She wants to hold onto it at any cost, and that's why she's so timid and hesitant to take any risks whatsoever. (And before anybody even starts: No. A rock singer performing with a symphony orchestra is not a risk. It's practically a cliche.)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved