Do you think Stevie should do a new solo album?

[holidayroad]

A solo album could be a risk. What's your opinion? I know a lot of fans want new material, but what if it's not an album that's as well crafted as Trouble In Shangri-La? I know most fans don't want another Street Angel.....

[louielouie2000]

While I'd simply love new material, I think she tied up her solo career pretty neatly with TISL. I'd hate to see her do something which doesn't measure up to that. I also fear any new solo material might result in more covers or bad pairings with other artists... and I don't think any of us are interested in seeing any more of that. I think Stevie has some loose ends with the Mac that need to be addressed... but I don't know how possible that is without Christine in the mix. She really was the glue.

[holidayroad]

While I'd simply love new material, I think she tied up her solo career pretty neatly with TISL. I'd hate to see her do something which doesn't measure up to that. I also fear any new solo material might result in more covers or bad pairings with other artists... and I don't think any of us are interested in seeing any more of that. I think Stevie has some loose ends with the Mac that need to be addressed... but I don't know how possible that is without Christine in the mix. She really was the glue.

I couldn't agree with you more!!!

[SuiteShangriLa]

yes. i think she should do a solo album. she should do an album with fleetwwod mac first if thats the plan. then she should do her own thing. she should do the rhiannon album. because its something shes always wanted to do. she should just do it, if not for the world...do it for yourself. :)

[jedw]

I picked, "I want her to, but I'm afraid it will not go over well"

Probably an unpopular opinion ahead but here goes,

I can't pretend that her voice sounds that good anymore most of the time, I saw her live with the Unleashed tour and - Yeh not too bad, but seriously I can't listen to 'Say you will' or 'Soundstage' .. just can't , Bob Dylans granny kinda thing.

And as much as she says she writes all the time, I suspect in reality she's got very little up her sleeve in terms of new songs.

I say all this, I AM a fan, I don't want her turning out crap, either with FM or solo, I'd rather have nothing.

[Nikolaj]

Yes, she should record a new cd. And I think she has started already. I expect new music solo first, and then with Fleetwood Mac.
Though Christine was smart to be 'done', I think Stevie, Lindsey, Mick , John, their management(s) and concert promoters will move heaven and earth to get Christine back for the cd and a 'reunion/farewell tour' to have Fleetwood Mac get back into the stratosphere. Turns out the band does need her, the last two Fleetwood Mac tours just did not have the impact that Fleetwood Mac had with Christine and it would be pointless for there to be another. Another tour without Christine would be a hard sell, with Christine it will be a slam-dunk. I think Christine will be ready to brave the private jets again and do a proper farewell, because she is going to get bigger a deal than she ever dreamed possible, and it will lure her back, and she'll get to do that proper farewell, which she hasn't done. It will appeal to her to reclaim her position as a major, vital ingredient in the success of Fleetwood Mac.
I'm nearly postive Stevie will have a new solo single released at least online by summer, and a full new solo cd by September, with about a 3 month solo tour from September to December.
Next summer a Fleetwood Mac cd with Christine will be out, possibly even by May 1, and a huge summer-into-fall Fleetwood Mac farewell tour, which is how they'll have to present it to Christine. Also, for the 3rd time now, I'll go out on a limb and say the Stevie solo cd (AND the Mac cd) will be on Iovine's label.

[Nikolaj]

A solo album could be a risk. What's your opinion? I know a lot of fans want new material, but what if it's not an album that's as well crafted as Trouble In Shangri-La? I know most fans don't want another Street Angel.....

It's going to have to be much better-crafted, or perhaps, less-crafted than TISL. Her voice was Pro-tooled to death on that cd, and many here on The Ledge have pointed out that there was a sterile or mechanical feel to her vocals on that cd, especially the Sheryl Crow-produced tracks.
More than a few of us agreed that John Shanks brought out the best in Stevie on that cd, he did a great job producing the tracks that he did.

[RockALittle250]

I'm voting yes, because although it wasn't as great as we were all hoping (thanks Swifty), performing at the Grammys was a bold move for Stevie, who admitted in 1998 that she would really never have a reason to perform there again. If she doesn't do anything this year with FM, then i suspect that she will continue working on an album, which in my opinion, is in many pieces, but is in some stage of progress. All she has to do is sit down, pick up the pieces, and put them together. It's like with TISL, it was an album that was in progress for 7 years, but it just took a looooong time for her to put all the pieces together.

[holidayroad]

It's going to have to be much better-crafted, or perhaps, less-crafted than TISL. Her voice was Pro-tooled to death on that cd, and many here on The Ledge have pointed out that there was a sterile or mechanical feel to her vocals on that cd, especially the Sheryl Crow-produced tracks.
More than a few of us agreed that John Shanks brought out the best in Stevie on that cd, he did a great job producing the tracks that he did.

I'm not saying all of TISL was stellar, but it is a solid enough album. Most fans were overall pleased with it. I guess it mostly comes down to thinking that Stevie should put Fleetwood Mac first and that we want Stevie to be respected musically. A not so great solo album could ruin both of those things.

[Nikolaj]

I'm not saying all of TISL was stellar, but it is a solid enough album. Most fans were overall pleased with it. I guess it mostly comes down to thinking that Stevie should put Fleetwood Mac first and that we want Stevie to be respected musically. A not so great solo album could ruin both of those things.

I think, seriously, it's thoughtful and nice of you to be concerned. I don't think that Stevie has to put Fleetwood Mac first, do they put her first? Even if they do, I doubt that Mick or LB consult her about solo projects they work on. SN has been there when they have wanted her, the 'Say You Will' tour went on forever, longer than she initially expected, and the Unleashed Tour was proof of her being there for the band to great commercial gain for all involved. I really think the behind-the-scenes game plan is that the band very much wants to have Christine on their next cd and tour, and that it will happen, in time for summer of 2011 and the cash-c0w reunion tour, and that leaves time for Stevie to do a solo cd. The band knows it will take more than a few months to work out the return of Christine, there would be no way to have it all together by this summer, and record, and have a tour ready to go, so I believe they're shooting for the summer of 2011 for the return of Christine and a major Fleetwood Mac renaissance that they've been unable to make happen without her. They need Christine for their next tour and in the next 16 months they can work it out and have a cd ready for summer 2011, the reunion tour is their ace up their sleeves, and it can't happen by this summer.
As for Stevie not being respected musically by a not-great solo album, there are some people who never have and never will respect her. Their loss. I think her next solo cd is going to be amazing, because she has it in her, and also because it really needs to be. If it turns into a "not great solo album" I don't think it will 'ruin' her chances at being 'respected musically'-- She has, and has had, the public, forever, and even some of her most excellent work, at the height of her career, got slings and arrows from critics or from people who felt like Stevie deserved the criticism. I think she's critic-proof by now, but I agree it's way better to have her held in high esteem than not to be.
I just want the new music. I'd rather have new music than worry about critical response, she's a legend, that can't be taken away from Stevie Nicks!

[Musicman408]

Definitely would love to see new material from both Stevie, AND the Mac. Doesn't really matter a whole lot which it is- just new songs overall would be a great thing.

[jedw]

If she WERE to record another album, id like to see her do something pretty far out.

Edge of seventeen, and Stand Back, (as well as plenty of her material within FM) broke the mold in their day - they still sound pretty unique now.

Some of her later records however were a bit "just a bunch of songs".

"far out", or don't bother I'd say. :nod:

[Angel69]

I think she definitely has another record or two in her. However, she should steer clear away from Sheryl Crow, been there done that.

[Jondalar]

Not really. It's just going to be more of the same. I didn't love TISL. Do you really think a new solo album is going to add something to her legacy? I just think it won't go over very well.

The only way I would want a new solo album is if she got a great producer and really concentrated on the songwriting. Maybe she should exeriment or something.

[APerfectLie]

Hell yeah Stevie SHOULD do a new album. Will she is the real question. But I believe she will. Especially if she's heard any talk about her over the past 24 hours. I can't count how many articles I've seen with the words "legend" and "Stevie Nicks" in the same sentence and it makes me happy that most of the world outside of us stevieatics realize that there is something special about Stevie and that she really is a legend. People keep saying she may be afraid of ending her career on a bad album so she won't do one, but I don't think that's true. The main reason Street Angel was a flop was because Stevie didn't like it. I guarantee you, had Stevie loved that album and promoted the **** out of it, we'd all be singing a different tune about Street Angel, even if it were the same songs. And the reason Stevie wasn't happy with it was because it was recorded during the klonopin years, but released not too long after rehab. And she tried to "fix it" but she couldn't. I think Stevie has a lot of material and she will get in the studio and record some stuff just to see what it sounds like. If she doesn't like it, she won't release it, but I'm sure there will be many tracks she ends up liking and putting on a record. Hell, she even once said she may just release a few songs on iTunes here and there, so who knows? I really think we will get a new Stevie record, but I am positive we will get some new Stevie material in the years and possibly months to come.

[Amlyn]

Here's my take. Sorry, it's long, but once I got going, I couldn't stop.

Stevie should do a new album if she feels she has something to express and share with us and not just for the sake of going through the motions. She needs to take all the what-ifs that exist in today's music world for putting out an album out of the equation and decide if it is something she still has passion for.

If we go back to basics, relaying a message or sharing an experience through song is the foundation for the success of all the great singer/songwriters. Whether the message be completely an account of their own experience, or someone else's, or even somewhat fiction, there was something that sparked the need for them to put those thoughts into words and put those words into a song and those songs into a performance. It was a formula that has worked for many, many years.

Then 29 years ago a music video premiered on a new network called MTV - Video Killed the Radio Star. Talk about a premonition. As much as I love music videos and still watch Totally 80's on VH1 Classic, this really was the beginning of the end for the mystique of the rock star. Ok, so maybe for 10-15 years, it was a good thing. We were able to listen to and watch our idols and dress like them and dance like them and just want to be them. But when MTV became anything but Music TV, it was a sign of the times. The music world was changing. With the inception of the internet and the boom with technology over the past 15 years, we are watching concerts on youtube from the comforts of our couches, we are downloading music in 20 seconds from our favorite music site, we are blogging about how off-tune Taylor Swift is before she can even finish her song. It's all there for us. No more mystery. And for who? The same regurgitated pretty to produce kids these record companies are signing over and over again. Somewhere in this cash is king formula, the general public has lost the reason why we listen to music. Everything these performers do becomes fodder for tabloids and blogs and websites, and at the end of the day...this is what is selling the music, not the music itself. What happened to the emotional experience and connection to lyrics and the music? Only someone who is a true musical artist like Stevie can and needs to bring us back to the reason why we listen to music in the first place.

Stevie needs to dismiss all the possible scenarios that can play out with a new album like will my music sell? Will I make any money if everyone steals off the internet? Is there anyone out there who wants to hear me anymore? All questions we've heard her state as a problem with today's music in one way, shape or form. She needs to just go with what she feels and not be so scared of what could happen. She doesn't need to rebrand herself. Last night's musical performance proved that based on all the positive publicity and labels like "legendary" and "veteran." History has proven you don't need to mess with a classic. If she really believed anything else, we would hear anything other than the Rumours history in every single interview she's done the past umpteenth years.

Personally, I'd love to see her put out a new album. It's been almost a decade since she's focused her energy on something new. Something must have inspired this woman in the past ten years. The story can't really be over yet.

[Jondalar]

Hell yeah Stevie SHOULD do a new album. Will she is the real question. But I believe she will. Especially if she's heard any talk about her over the past 24 hours. I can't count how many articles I've seen with the words "legend" and "Stevie Nicks" in the same sentence and it makes me happy that most of the world outside of us stevieatics realize that there is something special about Stevie and that she really is a legend. People keep saying she may be afraid of ending her career on a bad album so she won't do one, but I don't think that's true. The main reason Street Angel was a flop was because Stevie didn't like it. I guarantee you, had Stevie loved that album and promoted the **** out of it, we'd all be singing a different tune about Street Angel, even if it were the same songs. And the reason Stevie wasn't happy with it was because it was recorded during the klonopin years, but released not too long after rehab. And she tried to "fix it" but she couldn't. I think Stevie has a lot of material and she will get in the studio and record some stuff just to see what it sounds like. If she doesn't like it, she won't release it, but I'm sure there will be many tracks she ends up liking and putting on a record. Hell, she even once said she may just release a few songs on iTunes here and there, so who knows? I really think we will get a new Stevie record, but I am positive we will get some new Stevie material in the years and possibly months to come.

Street Angel was a flop because the songs were boring and weak. I think Nicks realized this and it was her fault it wasn't a good album.

[APerfectLie]

Here's my take. Sorry, it's long, but once I got going, I couldn't stop.

Stevie should do a new album if she feels she has something to express and share with us and not just for the sake of going through the motions. She needs to take all the what-ifs that exist in today's music work for putting out an album out of the equation and decide if it is something she still has passion for.

If we go back to basics, relaying a message or sharing an experience through song is the foundation for the success of all the great singer/songwriters. Whether the message be completely an account of their own experience, or someone else's, or even somewhat fiction, there was something that sparked the need for them to put those thoughts into words and put those words into a song and those songs into a performance. It was a formula that has worked for many, many years.

Then 29 years ago a music video premiered on a new network called MTV - Video Killed the Radio Star. Talk about a premonition. As much as I love music videos and still watch Totally 80's on VH1 Classic, this really was the beginning of the end for the mystique of the rock star. Ok, so maybe for 10-15 years, it was a good thing. We were able to listen to and watch our idols and dress like them and dance like them and just want to be them. But when MTV became anything but Music TV, it was a sign of the times. The music world was changing. With the inception of the internet and the boom with technology over the past 15 years, we are watching concerts on youtube from the comforts of our couches, we are downloading music in 20 seconds from our favorite music site, we are blogging about how off-tune Taylor Swift is before she can even finish her song. It's all there for us. No more mystery. And for who? The same regurgitated pretty to produce kids these record companies are signing over and over again. Somewhere in this cash is king formula, the general public has lost the reason why we listen to music. Everything these performers do becomes fodder for tabloids and blogs and websites, and at the end of the day...this is what is selling the music, not the music itself. What happened to the emotional experience and connection to lyrics and the music? Only someone who is a true musical artist like Stevie can and needs to bring us back to the reason why we listen to music in the first place.

Stevie needs to dismiss all the possible scenarios that can play out with a new album like will my music sell? Will I make any money if everyone steals off the internet? Is there anyone out there who wants to hear me anymore? All questions we've heard her state as a problem with today's music in one way, shape or form. She needs to just go with what she feels and not be so scared of what could happen. She doesn't need to rebrand herself. Last night's musical performance proved that based on all the positive publicity and labels like "legendary" and "veteran." History has proven you don't need to mess with a classic. If she really believed anything else, we would here anything other then the Rumours history in every single interview she's done the past umpteenth years.

Personally, I'd love to see her put out a new album. It's been almost a decade since she's focused her energy on something new. Something must have inspired this woman in the past ten years. The story can't really be over yet.

I couldn't have said it better myself.

[APerfectLie]

Street Angel was a flop because the songs were boring and weak. I think Nicks realized this and it was her fault it wasn't a good album.

I disagree. I love most of Street Angel. Is it Stevie's best? No, and she realized that. But her dislike of the album made it seem much worse than it was. The problem with Street Angel was that she was clouded by klonopin until it was too late and then she was disappointed with what she had done. I think today she wouldn't be in the same situation because she would know whether or not the songs were good and whether or not she wanted to release them. And even if people said the songs were "boring and weak" I think she'd still be perfectly content if she was happy with them herself.

[Musicman408]

What kind of sound would we like to hear from Stevie? A sound that could sell?

I can't help but think of Robert Plant and Allison Krauss's album and how chill that is. I love it- and it totally did really well. Should Stevie do something like that?

[Jondalar]

I disagree. I love most of Street Angel. Is it Stevie's best? No, and she realized that. But her dislike of the album made it seem much worse than it was. The problem with Street Angel was that she was clouded by klonopin until it was too late and then she was disappointed with what she had done. I think today she wouldn't be in the same situation because she would know whether or not the songs were good and whether or not she wanted to release them. And even if people said the songs were "boring and weak" I think she'd still be perfectly content if she was happy with them herself.

Well Trouble in Shangri La wasn't a masterpiece and she was parading around telling everyone it was.

[APerfectLie]

Well Trouble in Shangri La wasn't a masterpiece and she was parading around telling everyone it was.

Exactly! And now people are wondering if she can top TISL.

[Jondalar]

Exactly! And now people are wondering if she can top TISL.

Well if Stevie would come out with a small, intimate album that contained songs like Twisted (demo version) and three birds of rhiannon or an experimental album, I wouldn't mind. But she won't, she'll do the same type of stuff again. How many versions of Sweet Girl or Silver Girl or Freedom or Blue Denim or Touched by an Angel, can a person take? I don't want to hear anymore of that. They are crap. They are more for her, then the listener. If hasn't learned by now, she never will.

[Meowi]

She can pull it off, although I don't know what to expect :confused:

[EnchantedKiwi]

I'm keen for a Buckingham Nicks record.

Maybe they could remaster the original album aswell.








Yeah Right :(

[Brad]

How many versions of Sweet Girl or Silver Girl or Freedom or Blue Denim or Touched by an Angel, can a person take? I don't want to hear anymore of that. They are crap. They are more for her, then the listener. If hasn't learned by now, she never will.

That's exactly why I voted "no." Her days of "Rhiannon'", "Angel," "GDW," "Eo17," and "Sara" are over, and have been over, for decades. For the past 13 years, we've seen nothing but rehashing over and over ad nauseum in her live "performances" (term used loosely), and pulling out 1 rarity per tour a la "Sara" or "Beautiful Child" isn't cutting it. Based on her touring, she's not going to do anything experimental or different on an album either. She'll pick up the flavor of the week such as Taylor Swift or Katy Perry, do a lame duet about some unrequited or unattainable love interest or how men just don't "get" a female rocker's lifestyle and therefore she'll always be alone, and the CD will soon be lost between the car seats.

I've been a fan for 25 years, so this isn't me just being anti-Stevie. I would love for her to come out with a new album that would amaze me and bring her back into the spotlight. But honestly, I've been left disappointed with ~90% of what she has done sine 1987. Why would a new album be any different? She's so comfortable with what she's been doing on stage since The Dance, what in the world would make you think she would actually change things up on an album? It's not gonna happen. And this talk of dueting with Taylor Swift bringing her back into the mainstream? That worked out really well with Crow, Maines, and Gray the last time around, right?

Just my opinion, of course.

Brad

[holidayroad]

Exactly! And now people are wondering if she can top TISL.

When Trouble in Shangri-La came out, I didn't have the internet, cable Tv, or anything where I heard Stevie's thoughts on the album. I didn't have her influence to tell me it was a good album. All I knew was what I was hearing.

[holidayroad]

I think, seriously, it's thoughtful and nice of you to be concerned. I don't think that Stevie has to put Fleetwood Mac first, do they put her first? Even if they do, I doubt that Mick or LB consult her about solo projects they work on. SN has been there when they have wanted her, the 'Say You Will' tour went on forever, longer than she initially expected, and the Unleashed Tour was proof of her being there for the band to great commercial gain for all involved. I really think the behind-the-scenes game plan is that the band very much wants to have Christine on their next cd and tour, and that it will happen, in time for summer of 2011 and the cash-c0w reunion tour, and that leaves time for Stevie to do a solo cd. The band knows it will take more than a few months to work out the return of Christine, there would be no way to have it all together by this summer, and record, and have a tour ready to go, so I believe they're shooting for the summer of 2011 for the return of Christine and a major Fleetwood Mac renaissance that they've been unable to make happen without her. They need Christine for their next tour and in the next 16 months they can work it out and have a cd ready for summer 2011, the reunion tour is their ace up their sleeves, and it can't happen by this summer.
As for Stevie not being respected musically by a not-great solo album, there are some people who never have and never will respect her. Their loss. I think her next solo cd is going to be amazing, because she has it in her, and also because it really needs to be. If it turns into a "not great solo album" I don't think it will 'ruin' her chances at being 'respected musically'-- She has, and has had, the public, forever, and even some of her most excellent work, at the height of her career, got slings and arrows from critics or from people who felt like Stevie deserved the criticism. I think she's critic-proof by now, but I agree it's way better to have her held in high esteem than not to be.
I just want the new music. I'd rather have new music than worry about critical response, she's a legend, that can't be taken away from Stevie Nicks!

I understand what you are saying. Maybe Stevie shouldn't have to put Fleetwood Mac first, but at this point, I think she should. The main reason is that you have 4 people in their 60s. As much as we'd all love to think so, the members of Fleetwood Mac are not going to live forever. Time is not something they need to waste anymore. Yes, it would be nice if they all took time on their own, for solo albums, working on getting Christine back, etc. In 2011, Christine will turn 68 years old. Does this sound like a band that should be taking their time?
I also agree that some people will never respect Stevie and that some people will Always respect Stevie, no matter what she does musically.

[wheart]

Stevie putting out any solo material would make me very happy indeed. A collection of piano/guitar demos would make me the happiest!:)

[starshine]

That's exactly why I voted "no." Her days of "Rhiannon'", "Angel," "GDW," "Eo17," and "Sara" are over, and have been over, for decades. For the past 13 years, we've seen nothing but rehashing over and over ad nauseum in her live "performances" (term used loosely), and pulling out 1 rarity per tour a la "Sara" or "Beautiful Child" isn't cutting it. Based on her touring, she's not going to do anything experimental or different on an album either. She'll pick up the flavor of the week such as Taylor Swift or Katy Perry, do a lame duet about some unrequited or unattainable love interest or how men just don't "get" a female rocker's lifestyle and therefore she'll always be alone, and the CD will soon be lost between the car seats.

I've been a fan for 25 years, so this isn't me just being anti-Stevie. I would love for her to come out with a new album that would amaze me and bring her back into the spotlight. But honestly, I've been left disappointed with ~90% of what she has done sine 1987. Why would a new album be any different? She's so comfortable with what she's been doing on stage since The Dance, what in the world would make you think she would actually change things up on an album? It's not gonna happen. And this talk of dueting with Taylor Swift bringing her back into the mainstream? That worked out really well with Crow, Maines, and Gray the last time around, right?

Just my opinion, of course.

BradYou make many great points. I've been a fan just about as long...since like '88....I would love it if she would release 'new' & old songs....or even another 'larger' boxed set but done better than Enchanted.....like a 10 cd box set with a book of photos encluded.....it would have rare and unreleased songs on it alternates/extended mixes....masters /rare live songs/and maybe a DVD or 2 with more from the BD sessions/WH/RAL/Mirror....etc....interviews/rare live video....oh theres really so much she really could do with this.....it does still take work....I wouldn't want the regular versions.....I want more thought to go into either a 'new' recording or whatever she does. I agree she should do it cause 'she' wants too.......personally, its a crime that there is UNreleased material that will not ever see the light of day. Same for outtake photos etc......really if she or Mac are gonna do something or have something up there 'sleeve' to me NOW is the time not 3-10 yrs from now.....there getting older as are we the listening public......when your not in the public eye your not even given a 2nd thought about......I don't think that TISL is Stevie's master piece but thats only IMO....I mean its good but it could've been better too me....now SA does have its issues but Stevie shouldn't care what others think of her or that solo effort. Ok so it went bad , but it was your record with songs you recorded.....and released.....love it for what it is.....I mean its been since '94.....its part of your music.....love your music again. Sometimes I wonder if she does love her music cause of all the endless touring solo/Mac.....I'd think she'd be tired of her own voice right now & songs. She needs a full yr brake.....go to Hawaii and relax on the beach ......and figure out what you'll do from now on.....enjoy your life.....its not like she can't......so the question is really for her to answer.....I mean if it happens great & if nothing happens I guess I can live with it.....life does go on ............
she just has to realize that she has options and openings.....if she will only open her mind up to see them.......:shrug:

[David]

I voted for Stevie to do another solo album. But I want haunting, haunted songs on it, like "Blue Lamp," "Sisters of the Moon," "Rhiannon," & "The Nightmare."

Barring that, I'd like for her to be a weatherman for TWC.

[SuiteShangriLa]

Here's my take. Sorry, it's long, but once I got going, I couldn't stop.

Stevie should do a new album if she feels she has something to express and share with us and not just for the sake of going through the motions. She needs to take all the what-ifs that exist in today's music world for putting out an album out of the equation and decide if it is something she still has passion for.


wtf....nvm

[APerfectLie]

You make many great points. I've been a fan just about as long...since like '88....I would love it if she would release 'new' & old songs....or even another 'larger' boxed set but done better than Enchanted.....like a 10 cd box set with a book of photos encluded.....it would have rare and unreleased songs on it alternates/extended mixes....masters /rare live songs/and maybe a DVD or 2 with more from the BD sessions/WH/RAL/Mirror....etc....interviews/rare live video....oh theres really so much she really could do with this.....it does still take work....I wouldn't want the regular versions.....I want more thought to go into either a 'new' recording or whatever she does. I agree she should do it cause 'she' wants too.......personally, its a crime that there is UNreleased material that will not ever see the light of day. Same for outtake photos etc.....

I would love a boxed set like this, but I'd like it later in life. I feel Stevie could do a few more new albums before hitting 70 if she tried. I'd like her to use her time now to produce new stuff while she is still able to, and save stuff like this for later. And we especially need a new solo album, because in the past 20 years we've gotten 2 studio albums from her, ad live cd, and pretty much 3 greatest hits collections. Does Stevie really want the last 40 years of her solo career to be dominated by "collections"??

[APerfectLie]

So I just came across this in an interview from 2007:

"She was planning a vacation in Hawaii before finishing the last few songs for a new solo album, when her record company called and told her it was putting out a greatest-hits CD and DVD, "Crystal Visions: The Very Best of Stevie Nicks" ("These records are never your idea," she says). So Nicks dusted herself off, packed her bags and got ready for the solo tour that brings her back to the Bay Area on Thursday."

They make it seem as if she was almost done and then had to stop and do the whole Crystal Visions thing... :shrug: Maybe a solo album actually isn't that far off?

[nailatixela]

PerfectLife, if that were really the case, what was Stevie doing in 2008? She went on tour because she didn't have "**** else to do" and she could of been finishing the last few songs on this solo album we haven't seen yet. She could of finished of the album that year. At one of the shows I went to... I think it was the 07u one, Stevie said during the band intros how she was going to go off to Hawaii to finish her Rhiannon stories. Whatever that means.

I'd love a new album. I thought about it though and I'd rather have a Mac album. TISL is quite good but thinking about it, I think there are more great songs on SYW.

[RockALittle250]

So I just came across this in an interview from 2007:

"She was planning a vacation in Hawaii before finishing the last few songs for a new solo album, when her record company called and told her it was putting out a greatest-hits CD and DVD, "Crystal Visions: The Very Best of Stevie Nicks" ("These records are never your idea," she says). So Nicks dusted herself off, packed her bags and got ready for the solo tour that brings her back to the Bay Area on Thursday."

They make it seem as if she was almost done and then had to stop and do the whole Crystal Visions thing... :shrug: Maybe a solo album actually isn't that far off?

I never understood that article when it was first published. The writer never elaborated on "before finishing the last few songs for a new solo album", i mean, if that was the case, wouldn't you get a quote from Stevie about that? That's why i always take articles like that with a grain of salt, because the writer can manipulate their article to make it sound as if Stevie is on the cusp of finishing an album, when in fact, she never said she was.

[APerfectLie]

PerfectLife, if that were really the case, what was Stevie doing in 2008? She went on tour because she didn't have "**** else to do" and she could of been finishing the last few songs on this solo album we haven't seen yet. She could of finished of the album that year. At one of the shows I went to... I think it was the 07u one, Stevie said during the band intros how she was going to go off to Hawaii to finish her Rhiannon stories. Whatever that means.

I'd love a new album. I thought about it though and I'd rather have a Mac album. TISL is quite good but thinking about it, I think there are more great songs on SYW.

It also did mention the Rhiannon film: " She's been writing a ballet and a film based on the Menologian, the mythology book that inspired her best-loved song, "Rhiannon." "

But I thought she was in Hawaii doing that when she got the call about doing the shows in las vegas??

I agree that the article is kinda strange in the sense that there is no direct quote of her saying that and that she hasn't released anything in the 3 years since... But I do think it is interesting. I know there was talk that before she could do a new album she had to do the greatest hits and the live album, so maybe she was in the process of doing a new album and then found out she had to do crystal visions and soundstage and by the time soundstage was released she was already on the road with FM so she hasn't really had time? I mean I'm not holding my breath on a new album, but I did think it was an interesting shimmer of hope that maybe she does have several new songs ready to be finished.

[StandbackStevie]

I am game for a new stevie solo or a fleetwood mac cd or even both with in the next few years But I do feel or see another Stevie solo cd before a new FM cd.

[holidayroad]

It also did mention the Rhiannon film: " She's been writing a ballet and a film based on the Menologian, the mythology book that inspired her best-loved song, "Rhiannon." "

I think they meant Mabinogian

[BellaDonna93]

OF COURSE!! WE WANT HER TO DO 1000000 OF ALBUMS!!!! lol xD