Photos - Page 417

CADreaming · #**6241** 09-28-2012, 10:13 PM

^Not the pictures fans took. My point is that sort if thing can't be policed once its out "there". Obviously, it's being passed around.

redtulip · #**6242** 09-28-2012, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

^Not the pictures fans took. My point is that sort if thing can't be policed once its out "there". Obviously, it's being passed around.

That doesn't mean we need to stoop to that level.

CADreaming · #**6243** 09-28-2012, 10:18 PM

Eh. I think you're overreacting.

Lindsfan · #**6244** 09-28-2012, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

^Not the pictures fans took. My point is that sort if thing can't be policed once its out "there". Obviously, it's being passed around.

No, you can't police everyone, but I recall one Ledgie who had her photo taken with Will at Saban and refused to post it due to him being a minor. I thought that was cool, and the right thing to do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by redtulip

That doesn't mean we need to stoop to that level.

Agreed. Just because we're allowed to post it doesn't mean we should. It doesn' feel right to me at all. Maybe because I have kids the same age as Will, but I think I'd feel that way regardless.

redtulip · #**6245** 09-28-2012, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

Eh. I think you're overreacting.

No, I just think there is a line and this crosses it.

elle · #**6246** 09-28-2012, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

You can't be serious!! LB puts his kids on stage and in documentaries!

i'd say stuff like kids' pics, unless provided by the parents publicly (e.g., magazines, CDs, etc) should be off limits. jmho. ymmv.

**mylittledemon** · #**6247** 09-28-2012, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elle

all - please just stop re-posting that pic!

mods?? my strong suggestion would be to please remove ALL posts related to the pic that shouldn't have been posted in the first place.

As far as I'm concerned, this is no different than the pics of Lindsey with his kids that have been published in major magazines, or any other online publication. I don't see this as a violation of privacy in terms of the content of the photo itself. Do I think it's in bad taste overall to even post pictures of his kid? Possibly. Michele can take the lead on this if she feels so inclined, but I don't think there's an issue here.

redtulip · #**6248** 09-28-2012, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

As far as I'm concerned, this is no different than the pics of Lindsey with his kids that have been published in major magazines, or any other online publication. I don't see this as a violation of privacy in terms of the content of the photo itself. Do I think it's in bad taste overall to even post pictures of his kid? Possibly. Michele can take the lead on this if she feels so inclined, but I don't think there's an issue here.

But this comes from a minor who doesn't have the judgement that an adult does. This crosses a line.

elle · #**6249** 09-28-2012, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

As far as I'm concerned, this is no different than the pics of Lindsey with his kids that have been published in major magazines, or any other online publication. I don't see this as a violation of privacy in terms of the content of the photo itself. Do I think it's in bad taste overall to even post pictures of his kid? Possibly. Michele can take the lead on this if she feels so inclined, but I don't think there's an issue here.

i'd say stuff like kids' pics, unless provided by the parents publicly (e.g., magazines, CDs, etc) should be off limits. jmho. ymmv.

CADreaming · #**6250** 09-28-2012, 10:39 PM

Oh so it's ok to look at it as long as its being passed around in private Facebook groups? I'm sorry, but that's just hypocritical.

Lindsfan · #**6251** 09-28-2012, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elle;1064298[B

i'd say stuff like kids' pics, unless provided by the parents publicly (e.g., magazines, CDs, etc) should be off limits. jmho. ymmv.

Agreed. People can still find them if they look hard enough, but they don't have to find them here.

redtulip · #**6252** 09-28-2012, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

Oh so it's ok to look at it as long as its being passed around in private Facebook groups? I'm sorry, but that's just hypocritical.

Not sure what you are getting at here....

CADreaming · #**6253** 09-28-2012, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redtulip

Not sure what you are getting at here....

I think I said.

Lindsfan · #**6254** 09-28-2012, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CADreaming

Oh so it's ok to look at it as long as its being passed around in private Facebook groups? I'm sorry, but that's just hypocritical.

I didn't realize that it was shared in a group. I knew where it came from because it was brought to my attention - in private, in the past, but I never considered sharing it with anyone else.

CADreaming · #**6255** 09-28-2012, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lindsfan

I didn't realize that it was shared in a group. I knew where it came from because it was brought to my attention - in private, in the past, but I never considered sharing it with anyone else.

Yeah, me either. But I've seen it passed around for a year. I still don't have a problem with it. They're not obtuse when it comes to this stuff.