Media Made Mess Of Storm News - Page 2

DownOnRodeo · #16 09-28-2005, 02:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ann Coulter

As for converting them to Christianity, I think it might be a good idea to get them on some sort of hobby other than slaughtering infidels.

Funny, I thought that was Christianity's hobby (not so much these days, of course).

Brwn_eyes0511 · #17 09-28-2005, 02:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownOnRodeo

Funny, I thought that was Christianity's hobby (not so much these days, of course).

yea.

DownOnRodeo · #18 09-28-2005, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

yea.

Touche.

SuzeQuze · #19 09-28-2005, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownOnRodeo

Touche.

Well, obviously Ann knows nothing of Islam which has nothing to do with terrorism. Terrorism is born of hopelessness, the poor and lost are recruited and brainwashed to hate. This is NOT Islam. Therefore there is no "logical" reason to convert the middle east to Christianity. Plus terrorism doesn't have a "country" to invade, the terrorists are mostly unwelcome. But killing the leaders of terrorists? Yes, that I support - only if capturing them is impossible.

GateandGarden · #20 09-28-2005, 07:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

Well, obviously Ann knows nothing of Islam which has nothing to do with terrorism. Terrorism is born of hopelessness, the poor and lost are recruited and brainwashed to hate. This is NOT Islam. Therefore there is no "logical" reason to convert the middle east to Christianity. Plus terrorism doesn't have a "country" to invade, the terrorists are mostly unwelcome. But killing the leaders of terrorists? Yes, that I support - only if capturing them is impossible.

I was about to say all of that and you did it much better than I was going to.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #21 09-28-2005, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DownOnRodeo

Touche.

no no no!

Brwn_eyes0511 · #22 09-28-2005, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

Well, obviously Ann knows nothing of Islam which has nothing to do with terrorism. Terrorism is born of hopelessness, the poor and lost are recruited and brainwashed to hate. This is NOT Islam. Therefore there is no "logical" reason to convert the middle east to Christianity. Plus terrorism doesn't have a "country" to invade, the terrorists are mostly unwelcome. But killing the leaders of terrorists? Yes, that I support - only if capturing them is impossible.

Which just really goes to show that, yet again, you aren't really getting the POINT!

If you agree with killing their leaders, then it is a given that you agree with point one (invading their countries)...as for converting them to Christianity...I think that it is pretty clear that a conversion of some kind MUST take place. Whether that conversion is to true Islam or to Christianity...I don't really think it matters! And if you don't think that "terrorism doesn't have a country to invade" then you haven't been paying attention! But I don't think Ann was targeting all Islamic people as terrorist! I mean for God sakes the woman was dating an Islamic when she wrote that column on September 13!

SuzeQuze · #23 09-28-2005, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

Which just really goes to show that, yet again, you aren't really getting the POINT!

If you agree with killing their leaders, then it is a given that you agree with point one (invading their countries)...as for converting them to Christianity...I think that it is pretty clear that a conversion of some kind MUST take place. Whether that conversion is to true Islam or to Christianity...I don't really think it matters! And if you don't think that "terrorism doesn't have a country to invade" then you haven't been paying attention! But I don't think Ann was targeting all Islamic people as terrorist! I mean for God sakes the woman was dating an Islamic when she wrote that column on September 13!

Well, "an Islamic" would be a Muslim. Believe me, I get the point completely. Did the Muslim promptly dump her? Plus, I most certainly have been paying attention. I do see both side of the issue and I choose mine. I would suspect that you don't see the point of our side.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #24 09-28-2005, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

Well, "an Islamic" would be a Muslim. Believe me, I get the point completely. Did the Muslim promptly dump her? Plus, I most certainly have been paying attention. I do see both side of the issue and I choose mine. I would suspect that you don't see the point of our side.

Well besides the fact that your side has no "point"...I guess not.

And no they continued to date for another year or so. It's funny because she would speak at colleges or wherever and these people would be shouting on and on about she hated Muslims...yet there in the front row would be her Muslim boyfriend! She never even thought of bringing that up...even though he told her that she should to shut them up...she said that it never even entered her mind. I guess she feels that you don't have to have a "live experience" to make a point, meaning...regardless of the fact that she had a Muslim boyfriend...her point was still the same.

wondergirl9847 · #25 09-28-2005, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

...and doesn't think women should vote.

Why not?

SuzeQuze · #26 09-28-2005, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

Well besides the fact that your side has no "point"...I guess not.

And no they continued to date for another year or so. It's funny because she would speak at colleges or wherever and these people would be shouting on and on about she hated Muslims...yet there in the front row would be her Muslim boyfriend! She never even thought of bringing that up...even though he told her that she should to shut them up...she said that it never even entered her mind. I guess she feels that you don't have to have a "live experience" to make a point, meaning...regardless of the fact that she had a Muslim boyfriend...her point was still the same.

We have a point that apparently just goes whoosh overhead for you. What a shame.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #27 09-28-2005, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

We have a point that apparently just goes whoosh overhead for you. What a shame.

Lots of other hear the woosh too!

dissention · #28 09-28-2005, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wondergirl9847

Why not?

You'll have to ask her.

"I think women should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it. And when they take these polls, it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care."
-- Politically Incorrect, Feb. 26, 2001

SuzeQuze · #29 09-28-2005, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brwn_eyes0511

Lots of other hear the woosh too!

Apparently so.

Brwn_eyes0511 · #30 09-28-2005, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

You'll have to ask her.

"I think women should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote. No, they all have to give up their vote, not just, you know, the lady clapping and me. The problem with women voting -- and your Communists will back me up on this -- is that, you know, women have no capacity to understand how money is earned. They have a lot of ideas on how to spend it. And when they take these polls, it's always more money on education, more money on child care, more money on day care."
-- Politically Incorrect, Feb. 26, 2001

DEAR GOD I love that women! I'm not saying I agree with her on this issue...but still...DEAR GOD I love that woman!

And today was SOO Ann day!

HOW TO TALK TO A LIBERAL (IF YOU MUST) IN PAPERBACK - BOOK TOUR: WED: FOX AND FRIENDS 8:20AM DAYSIDE WITH MIKE JARRET AND JULIET HUDDY SCARBOROUGH COUNTRY