Mick denies Stevie Nicks kicked Lindsey out of

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by bwboy

Exactly. All I did was quote Homer, I didn't bully him one bit. No point rehashing it, but it's telling that a guy who says the things he's says here thinks HE'S being bullied. The guy who tells another poster to shut up says HE'S the one being bullied.

Textbook.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by mitzo

Homer rules this place. Lord of the Flies.

Excellent reference.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

But it’s not against forum rules to use “obscene vulgarities” about members of the band. As for telling you to shut it, you were calling for someone who has been here for like twenty years to be banned. Maybe learn the rules of this board, first.

Not banned... rebuked just a little?

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

Well maybe if certain members of the band didn't behave in an obscene and vulgar way people wouldn't reference them in that way

Lindsey should not have been abusive to women. I agree.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by secondhandchain

When you call MF a whore it is not in a sexual context. He's a whore for money and it's really not that big a deal.

And other "whores" are not in it for the money?

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie

Good luck with that. And btw, I contacted mods after "my" attacks in the past month, and was told, "I don't wanna deal with it".

They don't want to deal with it because you bring it on yourself and they and you know it.

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by elle

Also how is calling Mick a whore - which is what he is, selling out his services for money - an obscene vulgarity?

Because calling anyone whore is a vulgarity and meant to degrade... I can't believe I have to explain this.

[Sugar Mouse]

Originally Posted by elle

Mouse you don’t seem to really read people’s posts but just insist on pushing your own line of thinking on everyone and continuously derailing threads. That’s what you’ve been doing from day 1 in the first thread you joined.

I can easily look at the forum rules that you posted and say you broke most of them just in a week you’ve been here. I’m out of this discussion. I’ve posted before reading all the replies and others have stated it all much more eloquently than I ever could. Yet you still ignore all that and insist on your same points over and over. That’s not respectful discussion.

Posting one's views and discuss the glorious music is exactly the purpose of a band forum. Using offensive language and bullying other members isn't. However, apparently the moderators allow this sort of behavior by some members that use this forum to make themselves feel better.

[mitzo]

Originally Posted by elle

Mouse you don’t seem to really read people’s posts but just insist on pushing your own line of thinking on everyone and continuously derailing threads. That’s what you’ve been doing from day 1 in the first thread you joined.

I can easily look at the forum rules that you posted and say you broke most of them just in a week you’ve been here. I’m out of this discussion. I’ve posted before reading all the replies and others have stated it all much more eloquently than I ever could. Yet you still ignore all that and insist on your same points over and over. That’s not respectful discussion.

Lectures to newcomers about respectful discussion? Here?

[mitzo]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Lindsey should not have been abusive to women. I agree.

He may still be. We do not know, maybe he assaulted or threated to assault Stevie and that is why he got the boot?

[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by mitzo

He may still be. We do not know, maybe he assaulted or threated to assault Stevie and that is why he got the boot?

No one knows what happened. I don't know any more about this than the day they confirmed it.

[HomerMcvie]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Unless you're Homer McVie and then it is... Welcome to The Ledge Sugar Mouse.

I'm so happy you're back.

[AncientQueen]

Originally Posted by mitzo

He may still be. We do not know, maybe he assaulted or threated to assault Stevie and that is why he got the boot?

Now THAT would be a reason to fire him, wouldn't it. So don't you think professional victim Stevie would have milked that? Or - just as an idea - would have called the police? She is in no way dependent on Lindsey, has no reason to not file charges. And with the metoo movement, she would have made a difference for abuse victims, but still no.
So stop trying to make this angle happen, you are respectless towards the victims of abuse, just to find a reason that paints Stevie in a better light. That's unseemly.

[jwd]

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Actually that last book or set of books that was leather bound was gorgeous and quite collectible. I just couldn't bring myself to pony up the $1200 or whatever it was.

I can think of a million other more practical things to spend $1200 on, no matter how beautiful Mick's books appear. That's just me. To each their own.

[button-lip]

Originally Posted by AncientQueen

Now THAT would be a reason to fire him, wouldn't it. So don't you think professional victim Stevie would have milked that? Or - just as an idea - would have called the police? She is in no way dependent on Lindsey, has no reason to not file charges. And with the metoo movement, she would have made a difference for abuse victims, but still no.
So stop trying to make this angle happen, you are respectless towards the victims of abuse, just to find a reason that paints Stevie in a better light. That's unseemly.

Oh, she would have milked that, no question about it. If she was capable of an ultimatum, she's capable of anything. Lindsey's family seems pretty sure of the angle they're pursuing. If Lindsey had done something wrong especially to Stevie, they wouldn't be speaking on social media with such authority.