The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2013, 12:33 AM
I'msoAfraid95's Avatar
I'msoAfraid95 I'msoAfraid95 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Leary, Ga, USA
Posts: 512
Default Songs that are horrible live

What songs, to you, are horrible when played live, or don`t hold up to the studio version?
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 01-08-2013, 12:41 AM
elle's Avatar
elle elle is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 12,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I'msoAfraid95 View Post
What songs, to you, are horrible when played live, or don`t hold up to the studio version?
Say Goodbye.

studio version is far from great but live you can really hear how just dreadful this song really is (other than beautiful guitar parts, but they cannot save it unlike Time Precious Time).
__________________

"kind of weird: a tribute to the dearly departed from a band that can treat its living like trash"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2013, 12:58 AM
vivfox's Avatar
vivfox vivfox is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,022
Default

The one thing I really miss about FM's live shows from 1975-1982 is how they were brave enough to make their songs sound a little bit different every night of the tour. I say they but I really mean Stevie. Beginning in 1987 they have tried too hard to make most of the songs sound like the records. I like all their live songs except Not That Funny and only because the jam session was tediously long.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:37 AM
KindOfWoman90's Avatar
KindOfWoman90 KindOfWoman90 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: American in the UK
Posts: 364
Default

I really don't like Second Hand News live - I love the studio version, but live I feel as if it's slower (may very well be the case). Also, the repetition of the bow bow bit just...no, it makes me cringe for some reason (only live of course).


On the other hand, I love Say Goodbye recorded version AND live. Had to say that since I keep seeing it brought up in various threads. I love the guitar parts, I love the harmonies, I love the lyrics
__________________
it may be hard to keep up with me ~ i'll always be able to reach you
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:47 AM
Peestie Peestie is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,606
Default

I've never thought SHN worked quite as well live. I love the studio version but the live version (with the possible exception of the Rumours tour) feel sluggish and "heavy". The new versions since 2003 suffer from this especially. I think it's because of Lindsey playing the Turner instead of the light acoustic guitars and timbres of the studio version.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:56 AM
Regina Regina is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 875
Default

LOVE Say Goodbye. Everything that was great about B/N shines in this song. Plus, I'm a mushball. I admit it.

I don't know. In general, I'd say I like almost everything better live than recorded. So, I'd almost have to answer the question in reverse (and, the answer would be "everything!").

OK-I hate Not That Funny. Live is even more aggravating than recorded. I dislike Say You Will live. I really, really am tired of Don't Stop both live and recorded. So Afraid--I do like better than the recorded version, I groan when I hear the opening strains, but--at the end, I'm into it just like (almost) everyone else.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2013, 09:06 AM
On Ice On Ice is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 651
Default

I would have to say that Dreams doesn't work well live, it loses its intimacy and with Stevie unable or unwilling to reach those high notes, the song loses much of its power. The real problem with the song live is that it always, always sounds rushed, like lets just get through Dreams and move on. This classic deserves better and if she won't sing it properly, shelve it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2013, 09:40 AM
drzubritsky drzubritsky is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 124
Default

I don't know if I would call it horrible, but "Gypsy" has never translated well to a live setting. The song is such a layered and intricate creation in its studio version that would be impractical to recreate onstage. Also, onstage Lindsey tends to sing his parts at the end much too forcefully, which doesn't work for the delicate nature of the song. Oddly, the one live version of "Gypsy" that I do love is the acoustic performance by just Stevie and Lindsey at one of those Heart Institute benefits in the early 2000s...for some reason, stripping the song down to its acoustic minimum actually works as a lovely alternative to the complex studio version.

I agree that "Dreams" hasn't worked too well onstage for the past couple of decades. However, judging from the performance on FM Live and clips from the late 70s, Stevie was capable of delivering a lead vocal that came close to the studio version. Unfortunately, they blew it on the chorus by having Stevie take the high harmony part rather than the lead.

WTH were they thinking with "Everywhere" on the TITN tour (with Stevie squealing "I wanna BEEEE with you")?! Fortunately,by the time of The Dance they refined the live arrangement into something much more palatable.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:09 AM
vivfox's Avatar
vivfox vivfox is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,022
Default

I forgot to mention Big Love. The first time Lindsey played it solo it was great and exciting but since then he has shoved that version down our throats. Every fan that comments on this song has said they wish he'd perform a full band version of it but noooooooooo. That's the biggest fault of Fleetwood Mac members. They get a good audience response on something and they'll never change the arrangement again.
I agree also with the other poster who said Dreams live is boring. It is but if it was placed later in the set it could feel more revived. I don't like the fact that we can pretty much predict the setlist. It never changes all that much. I wish just once they could really surprise us all and do something different.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:12 AM
FierySequences FierySequences is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 455
Default

Landslide....for the 10th million time
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:14 AM
vivfox's Avatar
vivfox vivfox is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FierySequences View Post
Landslide....for the 10th million time
Only because it's been played to death but in the live setting there is nothing to compare to that sound when the song ends of 10,000 people stomping their feet on the floor in approval and practically feeling the building shake.That sensation makes those 3 minutes worth it for me.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:20 AM
FierySequences FierySequences is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 455
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivfox View Post
Beginning in 1987 they have tried too hard to make most of the songs sound like the records. I like all their live songs except Not That Funny and only because the jam session was tediously long.
I respectfully agree and disagree with Viv. I also like most of the songs they perform live (even NTF, b/c we don't hear it often).

The 87/88 tour saw different arrangements of TITN songs such as Everywhere and 7W. Of course, I am biased b/c I love the TITN dvd. I agree LL and IIM sound alot like the album version. But IIM rocked! However, after 10+ years it was nice to hear them dust off these tunes (Everywhere) and SYLM and give them a fresher, modern day appeal.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:22 AM
elle's Avatar
elle elle is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 12,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivfox View Post
I forgot to mention Big Love. The first time Lindsey played it solo it was great and exciting but since then he has shoved that version down our throats. Every fan that comments on this song has said they wish he'd perform a full band version of it but noooooooooo. That's the biggest fault of Fleetwood Mac members.
WRONG!

Big Love acoustic is a masterpiece and a showpiece for LB. maybe "fans" don't like it, but everybody from the street and causal listeners who hear it are blown away by it every time.

it would be a huge mistake to drop it or change it, although if he did i trust LB that he would do an extraordinary job and make something different from a studio version. i've seen him change enough songs around into something different and unexpected. but there's no need to do that with acoustic BL considering it's perfect as is.

full studio version is just an ordinary dated song.
__________________

"kind of weird: a tribute to the dearly departed from a band that can treat its living like trash"
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:24 AM
elle's Avatar
elle elle is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: DC
Posts: 12,167
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by vivfox View Post
Only because it's been played to death but in the live setting there is nothing to compare to that sound when the song ends of 10,000 people stomping their feet on the floor in approval and practically feeling the building shake.That sensation makes those 3 minutes worth it for me.
looking forward to experience that for the first time.
__________________

"kind of weird: a tribute to the dearly departed from a band that can treat its living like trash"
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2013, 10:25 AM
I'msoAfraid95's Avatar
I'msoAfraid95 I'msoAfraid95 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Leary, Ga, USA
Posts: 512
Default

I don`t like the early live version of I`m So Afraid. Dreams, the Rumours era versions are good.To me, Tusk live isn`t that good.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Bekka Bramlett I GOT NEWS FOR YOU CD NEW & SEALED picture

Bekka Bramlett I GOT NEWS FOR YOU CD NEW & SEALED

$124.99



NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett picture

NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett

$7.69



BEKKA BRAMLETT I Got News For You CD (2009) US Shongaloo 1707 picture

BEKKA BRAMLETT I Got News For You CD (2009) US Shongaloo 1707

$51.22



RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10 picture

RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10

$69.99



Fleetwood Mac FULLY SIGNED On Q Newspaper JSA LOA McVie Mick Fleetwood Autograph picture

Fleetwood Mac FULLY SIGNED On Q Newspaper JSA LOA McVie Mick Fleetwood Autograph

$399.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved