Which lady of the Mac do you prefer?

[Miss Vicky]

Originally Posted by louielouie2000

I disagree. This is the Rumours Forum... Bekka wasn't in the Rumours lineup. That's just cut and dry facts, no emotions involved.

I love how people use this excuse, yet there is no general Fleetwood Mac forum on these boards. Therefore I still say Bekka should have been included.

[jbrownsjr]

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky

I love how people use this excuse, yet there is no general Fleetwood Mac forum on these boards. Therefore I still say Bekka should have been included.

I Second!

Let's have a vote...

[chiliD]

Originally Posted by louielouie2000

I disagree. This is the Rumours Forum... Bekka wasn't in the Rumours lineup. That's just cut and dry facts, no emotions involved.

Originally Posted by tilthefirefades

But Grace Slick gets an option?

Originally Posted by Miss Vicky

I love how people use this excuse, yet there is no general Fleetwood Mac forum on these boards. Therefore I still say Bekka should have been included.

F***ing myopic Rumours-ites. I don't give a rat's ass (sorry Vicky) WHAT era Bekka was in, what Forum it was posted in, in referring to "Ladies Of The Mac", Bekka should be included, since she WAS an official member of Fleetwood Mac, whether anyone likes it or not. Hell, I have had to put up with Buckingham & Nicks being "Fleetwood Mac members", YOU have to put up with Bekka, Dave Mason, et al. Fact of life...get the F*** over it.

[chriskisn]

Originally Posted by chiliD

Hell, I have had to put up with Buckingham & Nicks being "Fleetwood Mac members", YOU have to put up with Bekka, Dave Mason, et al.

Damn that Buckingham and Nicks. Just think how successful Fleetwood Mac might have been without them!