What do you think...

[michelej1]

Originally Posted by Black_Moon

They'll never love each other without being lovers,

I think just the opposite is true. I think it's easier to love each other without being lovers. I only think those flashes of hate flare up when there is lover tension. When you take out the sexual element, the underlying love born from decades of familiarity remains, less obscured by the drama of passion.

Michele

[Black_Moon]

Originally Posted by michelej1

I think just the opposite is true. I think it's easier to love each other without being lovers. I only think those flashes of hate flare up when there is lover tension. When you take out the sexual element, the underlying love born from decades of familiarity remains, less obscured by the drama of passion.

Michele

I mean love as in the romantic sense. When people "ship" for them, saying they still love each other, I don't think that's true. They're won't be in love without being lovers. I think the reason they were in love was because of everything -- the sexual passion, the dream they shared. Outside of being in a relationship, I don't think they're in love anymore. I think even if they got back together they wouldn't be in love anymore, unless they had another dream they wanted to be a part of.

I hope this makes sense and you can understand my post-midnight ramblings.

[michelej1]

Originally Posted by Black_Moon

I mean love as in the romantic sense. When people "ship" for them, saying they still love each other, I don't think that's true. They're won't be in love without being lovers. I think the reason they were in love was because of everything -- the sexual passion, the dream they shared. Outside of being in a relationship, I don't think they're in love anymore. I think even if they got back together they wouldn't be in love anymore, unless they had another dream they wanted to be a part of.

I hope this makes sense and you can understand my post-midnight ramblings.

Oh, I see what you mean. As long as platonic love remains. That's all we need.

Michele

[Gailh]

I would have voted for "Don't care" had that been an option



Gail

[jbrownsjr]

Originally Posted by Gailh

I would have voted for "Don't care" had that been an option



Gail

Ditto... no apology necessary..

[holidayroad]

Originally Posted by Gailh

I would have voted for "Don't care" had that been an option



Gail

I mainly asked the question because so many fans do care. As far as I'm concerned, I wish Stevie and Lindsey would just do their music without all the talk about the past relationship. It's been a lot of years ago and it's time to learn to 'play nice' with each other.

[sjpdg]

Ditto!! They are friends/bandmates who have a past. That past doesn't exist any more, they ahve worked it out in their own way to stay friendly or at least civil and stay together in Fleetwood Mac. Other than that, it's none of my business, if it ever was at all.

[WildHeart69]

Ok, I'll bite.

I dont think there is just ONE answer to sum up the last decade... I think if I had to choose an answer I would pick the "Stevie Loves LB, but LB doesnt love Stevie" choice.

I think Stevie has been sort of "hopelessly devoted" to Lindsey even though she has probably hated his guts more in the last 10 years than she really liked him. After the Dance she wrote "Fall From Grace" and that tells it all... and it translated her feelings very clearly. And during most of the SYW recording process and tour she wasnt too happy with him either, but I think she had resentment over Kristen (We all remember Kristen with the baby on the side of the stage during Silver Springs, right??) and that only caused more problems between them, but I think she still had that hopeless love for him. And I think LB is over her, but I have a feeling that Kristen has some obvious major trust issues.