What Happened to Re-release of Rumours...

[PenguinHead]

The last thing we need is a $250 release of Rumours. How would that be plausible and/or possible? Neil Young's massive box set has no comparison to Fleetwood Mac's album.

His set is an exhaustive and comprehensive span of his whole career. Also, Neil was extremely prolific (released/live/otherwise) -- the Rumours-era band was anything but prolific. In fact, sadly, overall, their collective output pales in comparison to many still-active bands of their stature.

That they couldn't manage to time their tour with the re-release of a 32-year old album speaks volumes to the incompetence of their management. Plus the band members have their tentative heads up their asses. Essentially, their marketing skills suck big time -- old school, with no relavance to the current market/technologies. But that's no surprise; they've been consistant in that regard. So many missed opportunities.

[David]

Originally Posted by PenguinHead

The last thing we need is a $250 release of Rumours.

Plus, what do people mean about "legal concerns"? How could there possibly be legal problems at this juncture? The label has already released Rumours twelve different times. Why would a thirteenth be any different?

[michelej1]

Originally Posted by David

Plus, what do people mean about "legal concerns"? How could there possibly be legal problems at this juncture? The label has already released Rumours twelve different times. Why would a thirteenth be any different?

Well, it comes from the "extras" that we were going to get with the songs, I would imagine.

Michele

[jbrownsjr]

Originally Posted by michelej1

Well, it comes from the "extras" that we were going to get with the songs, I would imagine.

Michele

Someone bought the rights to Mic the Screecher?

[michelej1]

Originally Posted by jbrownsjr

Someone bought the rights to Mic the Screecher?

No, the band still owns the audio, but the video of the stagehand trying to adjust the mic to eliminate the feedback -- well, they don't have the rights to that yet.

Michele

[starshine]

Originally Posted by PenguinHead

The last thing we need is a $250 release of Rumours. How would that be plausible and/or possible? Neil Young's massive box set has no comparison to Fleetwood Mac's album.

His set is an exhaustive and comprehensive span of his whole career. Also, Neil was extremely prolific (released/live/otherwise) -- the Rumours-era band was anything but prolific. In fact, sadly, overall, their collective output pales in comparison to many still-active bands of their stature.

That they couldn't manage to time their tour with the re-release of a 32-year old album speaks volumes to the incompetence of their management. Plus the band members have their tentative heads up their asses. Essentially, their marketing skills suck big time -- old school, with no relavance to the current market/technologies. But that's no surprise; they've been consistant in that regard. So many missed opportunities.

Great points....and no I don't want to pay $250.00 for only Rumours stuff.....we should get all the outtakes etc....from all the lps from the Rumours line up....plus videos/outtakes picture book...of course I"m in dream land......cause your so right about there marketing skills....heck Fmac/Stevie can't even put up half way decent web sites and 'current' & relevant too. They should be marketing there butts off esp with all they can do on the Net these days....so yes it is there loss and no one else's well expect for us 'Fans' though.......stupid.....I agree.....total missed opportunities....get your head out of the '70's.....its 2009.......stupid........

[Dodfather]

Originally Posted by PenguinHead

The last thing we need is a $250 release of Rumours. How would that be plausible and/or possible? Neil Young's massive box set has no comparison to Fleetwood Mac's album.

His set is an exhaustive and comprehensive span of his whole career. Also, Neil was extremely prolific (released/live/otherwise) -- the Rumours-era band was anything but prolific. In fact, sadly, overall, their collective output pales in comparison to many still-active bands of their stature.

That they couldn't manage to time their tour with the re-release of a 32-year old album speaks volumes to the incompetence of their management. Plus the band members have their tentative heads up their asses. Essentially, their marketing skills suck big time -- old school, with no relavance to the current market/technologies. But that's no surprise; they've been consistant in that regard. So many missed opportunities.

I agree completely with this post. It's what I was trying to say before but you put it across in a far more considered, less ranty way than I did!

[~GoldDustWoman~]

Good CD, but instead of re-releasing Rumours why don't they instead make a new album? I understand that Rumours did really well, but i've seen alot of people complain that they get tired of seeing the same stuff. People won't complain if something new is made...or will they....

[daniellaaarisen]

Originally Posted by ~GoldDustWoman~

Good CD, but instead of re-releasing Rumours why don't they instead make a new album? I understand that Rumours did really well, but i've seen alot of people complain that they get tired of seeing the same stuff. People won't complain if something new is made...or will they....

Bingo. This re-release of Rumours is a great idea for when they have no other way to make money in 15 years, or to correlate with a new CD/tour. But then again, Mac's management doesn't exactly like to be reasonable about these things.

[nailatixela]

Originally Posted by ~GoldDustWoman~

Good CD, but instead of re-releasing Rumours why don't they instead make a new album? I understand that Rumours did really well, but i've seen alot of people complain that they get tired of seeing the same stuff. People won't complain if something new is made...or will they....:shrug:

Oh they will!