Cost Of Fleetwood Mac Tusk Was Privilege Says Mick (Interview)

[MacMan]

Originally Posted by michelej1

Mick must've answered this question during the 20 minutes that Lindsey was absent, because there's no way Lindsey wouldn't have started chiming in.

As quoted, Mick seems somewhat less articulate than usual.

So, did the band pay for all of Tusk's production themselves or just pay a fraction of it? I guess they had to pay some money for it being a double album, but how much? I'd like to know before I start lavishing them with praise for reinvesting their wealth back into the art.

Michele

The record company likely financed the production of Tusk - but all money spent by the record company on the project would have been repaid through sales and or royalty payments in the subsequent years.. So yeah, the band kinda paid for it themselves whether it was upfront or not who knows.

[LukeA]

What a bunch of hindsight's 20/20, reconstructive history, say-whatever's-best-at-the-time, hypocritical crock of sh*t.

In other words, when it comes to Mick, par for the course.