The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old 01-11-2003, 08:59 PM
Cristian's Avatar
Cristian Cristian is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Concepcion, Chile
Posts: 749
Arrow Let's see

Quote:
Originally Posted By Carne Vaca
I would say that "maybe," "now" and "could" are superfluous words. Stevie should have pushed herself and come up with a more elegant way to convey the message
I don't agree with Carne's analysis of that first verse of "Thrown Down" which led him to think that the lyrics were not good, or were badly-edited. In poetry (or in songwriting, for that matter), there's always the recurse of using words that could reforce the meaning of what's one trying to say. And those words are helping to making that message strong... let's see:

"Thrown down, like a barricade
Maybe now he could prove to her
That he could be good for her
And that they should be together"


The narrator is seeing a relationship, like watching it on a TV, or from a different perspective. She is not living the situation, or dealing with her (that's when the use of the third person form becomes more relevant), she's only an observator. But she knows that the situation (that meeting of two old lovers) has no apparent meaning. At least it does not mean something that they could live in the future, something concrete. It is very vague. The future is dark with that person, as was the past. Again, it's not her the one who's living the experience , therefore the third person is an excellent resource. We know she is, but only because we know the story. A badly-informed listener would say that this is a nice story. And if he has good ears (or eyes to read the lyric booklet), he'd read that verse like this:

"Thrown down, like a barricade
Maybe now he could prove to her
That he could be good for her
And that they should be together"


because the intention is to leave one with the doubt. What's going to happen in the future? Who knows. Who cares even. The future is so dark that the words are stressing that point. And those become very important in that proces. By no means "superflous", in my humble opinion.

In the third person discussion, there is of course a thing about different songwriting styles, which, as Carne so elloquently put, is a matter where there's no "right" or "wrong". Let me put it this way. In their early years, The Beatles wrote songs "for their fans", as they expressed in their Anthology book... their songs were written in first person because they liked to put themselves in the ficticious stories that they told whilst doing the songwriting process. That, the youth and the first attempts on songwriting led to results such as:

Love, love me do
You know I love you


which of course made their point. They made an total change when (in their own words) realized that it was more "interesting" to say "she loves you" instead of "I love you", and they built a very sophisticated lyric (for the time, and for their ages) whilst writing a third-part story:

She says you hurt her so
She almost lost her mind
But now she says she knows
You're not the hurting kind
She says she loves you


This song would lose all the impact if written in first person ("I love you")... But that's a particular case. Paul McCartney in particular, stayed with this style of writing stories about other people ("Eleanor Rigby", "Rocky Raccoon", "Maxwell's Silver Hammer", "Another Day" are perfect examples)... John Lennon never liked the style, even though he used techniques of changing songwriting manners. For instance, he had, in the very confessional Plastic Ono Band album, a song called "I Found Out", about his own childhood traumas and stuff. He had this verse:

I heard something 'bout your ma and your pa
They didn't want you so they made me a star


but later on as it was going to become a "confessional" song, the change made it finally appear as:

I heard something 'bout my ma and my pa
They didn't want me so they made me a star


and it was more "impactant". Like that, in the first person.

So basically, it's everything about styles applied to certain songs. In the case of "Thrown Down", to me, it works. But yet Stevie can be very reiterative in the use of that way of writing, so I understand the fact that it can upset some people.

Interesting discussion.


Song of the moment - Jane
__________________
"You're here 'cause I say so!"

Last edited by Cristian; 01-11-2003 at 09:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


JOHN MCVIE HAND SIGNED 8x10 PHOTO AUTOGRAPHED FLEETWOOD MAC BASSIST RARE BAS COA picture

JOHN MCVIE HAND SIGNED 8x10 PHOTO AUTOGRAPHED FLEETWOOD MAC BASSIST RARE BAS COA

$127.49



Fleetwood Mac Tour John McVie Bass Guitar Pick picture

Fleetwood Mac Tour John McVie Bass Guitar Pick

$25.00



8x10 Print Fleetwood Mac Peter Green Mick Fleetwood John McVie 1969 #EFL picture

8x10 Print Fleetwood Mac Peter Green Mick Fleetwood John McVie 1969 #EFL

$13.99



Fleetwood Mac: Mick Fleetwood and John McVie Autographed

Fleetwood Mac: Mick Fleetwood and John McVie Autographed "Mirage" Album w COA

$200.00



Authentic Touring Fleetwood Mac John McVie  Vintage Tour Guitar Pick picture

Authentic Touring Fleetwood Mac John McVie Vintage Tour Guitar Pick

$118.75




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved