The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2007, 06:42 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl View Post
you're missing the point in the "job case" what Im saying is, people think their future is going to resemble today only better somehow, and in many cases, that just isnt true!! I know that in the Bay Area, particularly in the Silicon Valley, people are becoming unemployed at an amazing rate! and they USED to hold fantastic jobs and could afford dream homes! but no more
Thus, my point that it would not matter what mtg they took - they likely would lose their house under both, though the they may be able to hold on to it in the pmt was several hundred dollars less a month in an ARM. But, if they have no way to pay either mtg - they would lose their house. So, how is the ARM a bad choice here
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 05-01-2007, 06:52 PM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
Thus, my point that it would not matter what mtg they took - they likely would lose their house under both, though the they may be able to hold on to it in the pmt was several hundred dollars less a month in an ARM. But, if they have no way to pay either mtg - they would lose their house. So, how is the ARM a bad choice here
my point is, at least in the SF Bay Area, and surrounding comunities, people can only afford homes (because of inflated home prices) WITH 2 incomes and WITH creative financing. The days of a fixed 30yr mortgage (around here) are about gone.

and sadly, when people NEED a home, and they find one they love, they convince themselves that its possible. They find out later (3-5 yrs later) that they were wrong (because in the meantime, Jenny needed braces and Jeff wants to go to a good school, etc)

Last edited by irishgrl; 05-01-2007 at 06:57 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2007, 10:53 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl View Post
my point is, at least in the SF Bay Area, and surrounding comunities, people can only afford homes (because of inflated home prices) WITH 2 incomes and WITH creative financing. The days of a fixed 30yr mortgage (around here) are about gone.

and sadly, when people NEED a home, and they find one they love, they convince themselves that its possible. They find out later (3-5 yrs later) that they were wrong (because in the meantime, Jenny needed braces and Jeff wants to go to a good school, etc)
I do not think I was talking about that -- you were talking about the evil finance companies. If someone bites off more than they can chew - who the fool
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2007, 07:39 AM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
I do not think I was talking about that -- you were talking about the evil finance companies. If someone bites off more than they can chew - who the fool
yes, granted, but that is the crazy housing market in the Bay Area...people are nutz.

as for your bankruptcy info, Im aware of most of that info, but FHA WAS looking at his credit score and a year after his bankruptcy was discharged there were unexplained bits and pieces that the trustee didnt clean up. And the lending companies and credit companies are treating him as if he had discharged his debt completely, instead of paying 80%. He believes he was given bad legal advice and was not represented in Court (the attorney wouldnt tell him his court dates and then didnt show himself, and my friend got taken to the cleaners as a result.) I overstated the amount the Trustee got, it was 30k not 50k. still a huge sum of $$$
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2007, 09:37 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl View Post
. . . a year after his bankruptcy was discharged there were unexplained bits and pieces that the trustee didnt clean up. And the lending companies and credit companies are treating him as if he had discharged his debt completely, instead of paying 80%. He believes he was given bad legal advice and was not represented in Court (the attorney wouldnt tell him his court dates and then didnt show himself, and my friend got taken to the cleaners as a result.) I overstated the amount the Trustee got, it was 30k not 50k. still a huge sum of $$$
Well, he did discharge more than 20% of the debt because he likely saved tens of thousands in interest as interest cannot be charged or accrue in a 13 plan save for some exceptions like student loans, income tax, etc. So, creditors will never look at him as if he did anything other than bankrutpcy under either chapter, though 13 generally is considered slightly better.

As a general rule and with few excpetions, any and all creditors listed as such when he filed will be included in the discharge order. If these creditors are not accordingly reporting the debt on his credit report, they are in violation of the court's order. Mailing a copy of the listing of the creditors as well as the dischrage order as proof of the dispute to the credit reporting company should remedy this. If the creditor refuses, then they could be consrued as being in violation of the court's order, which usually means sanctions. Having said that, any unrelated negative items on his credit report will be up to him to remedy, and that is not that easy of a process, though it has gotten better.

And, yes, given those facts, it sounds like your friend got bad legal advice becuase the amount he paid in five years likely could have paid his debt off in full and left him with some money.

Last edited by strandinthewind; 05-02-2007 at 01:04 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2007, 06:35 AM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
Well, he did discharge more than 20% of the debt because he likely saved tens of thousands in interest as interest cannot be charged or accrue in a 13 plan save for some exceptions like student loans, income tax, etc. So, creditors will never look at him as if he did anything other than bankrutpcy under either chapter, though 13 generally is considered slightly better.

As a general rule and with few excpetions, any and all creditors listed as such when he filed will be included in the discharge order. If these creditors are not accordingly reporting the debt on his credit report, they are in violation of the court's order. Mailing a copy of the listing of the creditors as well as the dischrage order as proof of the dispute to the credit reporting company should remedy this. If the creditor refuses, then they could be consrued as being in violation of the court's order, which usually means sanctions. Having said that, any unrelated negative items on his credit report will be up to him to remedy, and that is not that easy of a process, though it has gotten better.

And, yes, given those facts, it sounds like your friend got bad legal advice becuase the amount he paid in five years likely could have paid his debt off in full and left him with some money.
just so you know, the items on the credit report werent unrelated, they were the exact items that were included, but for some unexplained reason each of them had up to $200 still showing and this was AFTER (a YEAR after mind you) the bankruptcy was discharged.

Any creditor who moans and groans about a lost 20% when they got paid 80% is an ASS.

Yes my friend got bad advice. He regrets this more than you know. He says that considering the way he's being treated in the credit world, he'd have been better off going the ch7 route (he says he qualified). They say no good deed goes unpunished, and I agree.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2007, 07:03 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl View Post
just so you know, the items on the credit report werent unrelated, they were the exact items that were included, but for some unexplained reason each of them had up to $200 still showing and this was AFTER (a YEAR after mind you) the bankruptcy was discharged.

Any creditor who moans and groans about a lost 20% when they got paid 80% is an ASS.

Yes my friend got bad advice. He regrets this more than you know. He says that considering the way he's being treated in the credit world, he'd have been better off going the ch7 route (he says he qualified). They say no good deed goes unpunished, and I agree.

It was not just 20% - they lost likely thousands in interest. And, I think everyone who owes you money in the future should pay you at 80% and with no interest they contracted to pay and on which you base your income. Better yet, your employer should pay you 80% of your contracted wage. Let's see how you like that

Having said that, I am sorry your friend went through this. And, I suggest contacting the credit reporting agencies and disputing the items -- then provide them with a copy of the dischage. That should remedy it.

Also, if he gets a credit card (even one requiring a deposit) and charges a little on it every month and pays it off each month -- maybe leave a balanace every other month, his credit will begin rebuilding itself. I know people two or so years out of a seven or 13 who get mortgages at market rates, especially if they have a good income. The trick is to shop around.

Last edited by strandinthewind; 05-03-2007 at 07:14 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW picture

Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW

$17.40



Fleetwood Mac LP Bundle - Best of Fleetwood Mac picture

Fleetwood Mac LP Bundle - Best of Fleetwood Mac

$124.99



BEAUTIFUL COVER 1982 STEVIE NICKS LEATHER AND LACE 7

BEAUTIFUL COVER 1982 STEVIE NICKS LEATHER AND LACE 7" VINYL 45 NM FLEETWOOD MAC

$150.00



STEVIE NICKS PROMO ONLY STOP DRAGGIN MY HEART 12

STEVIE NICKS PROMO ONLY STOP DRAGGIN MY HEART 12" VINYL TOM PETTY FLEETWOOD MAC

$150.00



Fleetwood Mac - Worldwide Live 10 CD Box Set - NEW picture

Fleetwood Mac - Worldwide Live 10 CD Box Set - NEW

$35.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved