movies they should make

[mylittledemon]

Originally Posted by Serrart

Actually as far as I know there's some buzz about it, and someone is writing a script. We'll see.

Romy

Yeah but its kinda like Terminator 3 in a sense. As cool as the idea of it was, and as long as the wait from T2 built up the anticipation...and then the movie totally sucked, and it ruined the "legacy" of the first two. So I'm afraid of what they would do with Ghostbusters III, as much as I would like to see it. I think it should have been done in 1994-1996...to pull it back now would probably mean Columbia is merely looking for a cash cow. Although if Akroyd, Murray, Ramis, and Hudson were all back and they had a hand in the script....it could be something.

[Serrart]

Originally Posted by mylittledemon

Yeah but its kinda like Terminator 3 in a sense. As cool as the idea of it was, and as long as the wait from T2 built up the anticipation...and then the movie totally sucked, and it ruined the "legacy" of the first two. So I'm afraid of what they would do with Ghostbusters III, as much as I would like to see it. I think it should have been done in 1994-1996...to pull it back now would probably mean Columbia is merely looking for a cash cow. Although if Akroyd, Murray, Ramis, and Hudson were all back and they had a hand in the script....it could be something.

I agree, sequels (and prequels) most of the time are a waste of time, with some exceptions, like Godfather 2, that for me is better than the original. About Ghostbusters, I could be wrong but I think Ramis and Aykroyd are directly involved in the project. I 'm not sure if Murray, now that he is an auteurs'muse, would like to return to Ghostbusters. But he has a great sense of self-orony, so who knows?

Romy