Howard Stern mentions F-Mac

[dissention]

Originally Posted by heyjupiter678

So, the bad pictures of Stevie are supposed to form the barometer by which she's measured?

No, not at all. As I've said numerous times, she's a very beautiful woman. She just needs lot of make-up. I submit that the same is probably true for Debbie.

Originally Posted by heyjupiter678

And someone said that Stevie needed to lose 30 pounds (!!) but in reference to Debbie, said that she'd merely "thickened up." Please. I don't know exactly when the Dazzle Dancers concert happened, but she's clearly bigger than Stevie in those pictures . . . and she's not under layers of clothing.

Bigger than Stevie?! I don't like to really talk about the weight of either woman because I find it tacky, but c'mon. Stevie looks like she had the backside of a Mack truck blasted onto her ass. Debbie is no skinny mini, but she's certainly lost a lot of weight in recent years and is looking more slimmer than Miss Nicks. A&E had an episode of Biography for her last month and from the live footage they aired, Deb can pull off wearing only bloomers onstage even at 59. Unfortunately, she only wore a tight skirt at my last concert.

Originally Posted by heyjupiter678

The thing is, everyone takes bad pictures sometimes. Especially when the camera is at your feet, pointed up.

Of course, I agree. But as I said earlier in this thread, don't show me photos of someone with four inches of pancake mix on their face and tell me how "hot" they are. (Note: I'm not saying you did this, I'm just making a statement. )