The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 07-23-2004, 03:07 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
Meryl is a true talent - maybe the best actor alive. I just bought Stuck On You & watched her restaurant scene last night.

There are definitely more depressing movies than Sophie's Choice, IMO. Playing For Time comes to mind. At least there's love at the end of SC.

BTW, I did not see the roast of her that aired recently.

- Jake
Sorry, Sophie and Nathan committing suicide after she's just admitted that she offered up her own child to be sacrificed at a concentration camp isn't love; their whole relationship was based upon desperation rather than love. I think it's the most depressing thing I've ever seen and I've seen Requiem For A Dream.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-23-2004, 03:13 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
My mom read the book before the movie came out & told me what the choice was, so I knew before I saw the movie. Really, the movie is about several of her choices.
BTW, Gloria Steinem wrote a stinging diatribe against the book as sexist trash years ago.

- Jake
I had seen the movie before I read the book and it was one of the most disturbing things I had ever seen. The book, however, was better because it went into a lot more depth about Nathan. In the movie, he really is just a stock character, whereas in the book he plays a much bigger role and his relationship with Sophie is way more fleshed out. If I have one complaint about the movie, it's that they did a very poor job of portraying their relationship. The final scene is also much better in the book, there's more dread and an 'Is this really happening?' feeling.

As for Gloria Steinem, everyhting she said during the 70s went out the window when she got married. Talk about your hypocrites.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-23-2004, 03:20 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Playing For Time is on video, but it's quite hard to find. We watched it in history class when I was in high school and Jake's right, it is a powerful film. Vanessa Redgrave was so good that I can't even describe it. The Germans in that film infuriated me moreso than in any other Holocaust movie. My grandmother taped it when it was on HBO back in the 80s and I have it here somewhere.

It's for sale at Amazon for $30:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=video
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-23-2004, 03:26 PM
Patti's Avatar
Patti Patti is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,036
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
Such flattery! Keep it to yourself. I have my reputation to downhold.
Let me know what you think of the film. It's almost about twenty-five years old by now but I think it probably holds up well. For a color film it really captures the bleakness of the landscape.
BTW, in case you don't know, it stars Vanessa Redgrave (remember the controversy?), Jane Alexander, and the actress who played Michael's cousin on Thirtysomething.

- Jake
Ah! I DO remember the Vaness Redgrave controversy, even though I never saw the movie. I'm on a mission....
__________________
Patti

"Don't f*&k with anyone's dog and don't ever date a musician."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-23-2004, 04:57 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
Sorry, Sophie and Nathan committing suicide after she's just admitted that she offered up her own child to be sacrificed at a concentration camp isn't love; their whole relationship was based upon desperation rather than love. I think it's the most depressing thing I've ever seen and I've seen Requiem For A Dream.
Gee, spoil the ending for people, why don't you.
I think there was love there. I'm certainly not romanticizing suicide, but there was love between these characters.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-23-2004, 04:59 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
I had seen the movie before I read the book and it was one of the most disturbing things I had ever seen. The book, however, was better because it went into a lot more depth about Nathan. In the movie, he really is just a stock character, whereas in the book he plays a much bigger role and his relationship with Sophie is way more fleshed out. If I have one complaint about the movie, it's that they did a very poor job of portraying their relationship. The final scene is also much better in the book, there's more dread and an 'Is this really happening?' feeling.

As for Gloria Steinem, everyhting she said during the 70s went out the window when she got married. Talk about your hypocrites.
I thought the movie ending was a bit weak, but I didn't see it until a couple of years ago, so maybe it had more power on its release.

I don't agree with everything Gloria said or says, but peopl's opinions do change as they grow. I wouldn't dismiss everything she said for a decade just because she had a change of heart.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:02 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
Playing For Time is on video, but it's quite hard to find. We watched it in history class when I was in high school and Jake's right, it is a powerful film. Vanessa Redgrave was so good that I can't even describe it. The Germans in that film infuriated me moreso than in any other Holocaust movie. My grandmother taped it when it was on HBO back in the 80s and I have it here somewhere.

It's for sale at Amazon for $30:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...glance&s=video
When you mentioned being infurioriated, I flahed on seeing the baby scene and the choose your friend scene in Escape From Sobibor a few months ago. Not as good of a film, but those parts were horrific.

Vanessa Redgrave is an amazing actress, & Jane Alexander is also great in PFT.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:25 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
Gee, spoil the ending for people, why don't you.
I think there was love there. I'm certainly not romanticizing suicide, but there was love between these characters.

- Jake
It's a 22 year old movie, if they haven't seen it by now, f*ck 'em.

I think there was a love there, but I don't think it was as passionate a love affair as they thought it was. They loved and cared about each other because of need and lonliness, not because they were soulmates. They were both heavily messed up and stayed together out of desperation and loyalty.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:28 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
I thought the movie ending was a bit weak, but I didn't see it until a couple of years ago, so maybe it had more power on its release.

I don't agree with everything Gloria said or says, but peopl's opinions do change as they grow. I wouldn't dismiss everything she said for a decade just because she had a change of heart.

- Jake
The ending was quite weak in the movie, I've always disliked it.

The fact that Gloria dismissed almost everything she said speaks volumes, my dear. I mean, she went overboard for overboard's sake. "An act of penetration is an act of rape" and all; she didn't even believe half the stuff she said.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:29 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
It's a 22 year old movie, if they haven't seen it by now, f*ck 'em.

I think there was a love there, but I don't think it was as passionate a love affair as they thought it was. They loved and cared about each other because of need and lonliness, not because they were soulmates. They were both heavily messed up and stayed together out of desperation and loyalty.
I can't say I necessarily agree based on the movie. I'm guessing that the book gave you extra insights, but based on the movie alone the love seemed pretty passionate.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:30 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
When you mentioned being infurioriated, I flahed on seeing the baby scene and the choose your friend scene in Escape From Sobibor a few months ago. Not as good of a film, but those parts were horrific.

Vanessa Redgrave is an amazing actress, & Jane Alexander is also great in PFT.

- Jake
I didn't see that one. I'll look it up on the IMDB to see more about it.

Vanessa Redgrave is fantastic. Her books were great, too; she got pretty in-depth about her support for Palestine and the effect it had on her career.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-23-2004, 05:33 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
The ending was quite weak in the movie, I've always disliked it.

The fact that Gloria dismissed almost everything she said speaks volumes, my dear. I mean, she went overboard for overboard's sake. "An act of penetration is an act of rape" and all; she didn't even believe half the stuff she said.
I don't think it was for overboard's sake, there was a greater goal. I think it was the great Gerda Lerner who said (or maybe she just quoted somebody else) that when a scale has long been tipped far in favor of one side, you've got to press down hard on the other side to get the fastest balance. Like any movement, feminism evolves over time, and the leaders are not stagnant either.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-23-2004, 06:18 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
I can't say I necessarily agree based on the movie. I'm guessing that the book gave you extra insights, but based on the movie alone the love seemed pretty passionate.

- Jake
I thought the movie exemplified that aspect of their relationship, albeit a bit less than in the book. But, I guess it is up to interpretation.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-23-2004, 06:21 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darklinensuit
I don't think it was for overboard's sake, there was a greater goal. I think it was the great Gerda Lerner who said (or maybe she just quoted somebody else) that when a scale has long been tipped far in favor of one side, you've got to press down hard on the other side to get the fastest balance. Like any movement, feminism evolves over time, and the leaders are not stagnant either.

- Jake
And I don't disagree. But Gloria Steinem, for the most part, exploited other women to advance her "cause," the very same cause that she called "over the top" as late as 2000. Look what she did to Linda Lovelace and others like her; she used them for all the publicity she could get, made some ridiculous comments when the media showed up, and then threw the women away like they were yesterdays garbage. She championed feminism, but became what she supposedly despised in the process.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-23-2004, 06:50 PM
darklinensuit's Avatar
darklinensuit darklinensuit is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 9,946
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
And I don't disagree. But Gloria Steinem, for the most part, exploited other women to advance her "cause," the very same cause that she called "over the top" as late as 2000. Look what she did to Linda Lovelace and others like her; she used them for all the publicity she could get, made some ridiculous comments when the media showed up, and then threw the women away like they were yesterdays garbage. She championed feminism, but became what she supposedly despised in the process.
I think this is an unfair assessment. Gloria championed Linda at a time when many people were inclined to bash her. And I hardly think she threw women away like garbage. I do not always agree with Gloria's opinions, but I would not call her a user.

- Jake
__________________
“The hair went from perm to growing out perm to really bad growing out perm to almost straight to good straight to long straight to beautiful straight to a lot of work straight back to the perm.”

Last edited by darklinensuit; 07-23-2004 at 06:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE picture

BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE

$49.99



NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett picture

NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett

$7.49



Bekka Bramlett

Bekka Bramlett "I Got News For You" CD In Mint. Shongaloo Records LLC 1707. 2009

$45.00



RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10 picture

RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10

$69.99



BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE picture

BEKKA BRAMLETT - I Got News For You - CD - **Excellent Condition** - RARE

$49.75




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved