Double standards (2nd try)

[bwboy]

Originally Posted by jbrownsjr

If you don't see the transparency of some of your posts, I'm certainly not here to explain them to you. And nor will I get into with you. Just know that you're not invisible. But, you're certainly welcome to ride high on top your pony. I know you won't fall Bwboy..

How can you say you're a fan of Fleetwood Mac when you write the things you do about them? I mean, can you really tell me you like Fleetwood Mac now? I have no idea what you're talking about, being transparent or invisible. Nor am I trying to get into it with you. I'm not being rude, I'm not arguing, I'm not name calling.

This reminds me of a scene I saw on a tv show one time. This woman was testifying someone was angry, and the lawyer said "objection, calls for the defendant's state of mind" and the witness said "you mean I can say the defendant threw his cell phone, slammed the door on my hand, yelled at me he wanted to kill me, and pulled my hair, but I can't say he was angry?"

[jbrownsjr]

Originally Posted by bwboy

How can you say you're a fan of Fleetwood Mac when you write the things you do about them? I mean, can you really tell me you like Fleetwood Mac now? I have no idea what you're talking about, being transparent or invisible. Nor am I trying to get into it with you. I'm not being rude, I'm not arguing, I'm not name calling.

This reminds me of a scene I saw on a tv show one time. This woman was testifying someone was angry, and the lawyer said "objection, calls for the defendant's state of mind" and the witness said "you mean I can say the defendant threw his cell phone, slammed the door on my hand, yelled at me he wanted to kill me, and pulled my hair, but I can't say he was angry?"

Again, I know you want to control what everyone says here. And I understand you don't think your posts are transparent (that's usually the case for someone that does it). But, if you don't like the way the fans here react. Go somewhere else. I'm done discussing this with you publicly.