The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
View Poll Results: who should replace SN if she continues refusing to record?
Susanna Hoffs 2 3.33%
Sheryl Crow 1 1.67%
Cyndi Lauper 1 1.67%
Gwen Stefani 0 0%
some other girl with well known mainstream persona 1 1.67%
some relatively unknown girl but creative (indie? influenced by FM?) 1 1.67%
Peter Quirk (of The Cave Singers) - or some other guy? 1 1.67%
Michelle Twig 0 0%
Ann or Nancy Wilson 2 3.33%
nobody - it should be just the 4 (Christine, Lindsey, John & Mick) 51 85.00%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2015, 12:34 AM
johnnystorms's Avatar
johnnystorms johnnystorms is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: new orleans
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMacD View Post
If Stevie was still a multi-platinum selling artist, that might be true. Her last two albums combined may have sold 250,000. If Stevie held that much power, the biggest news in the Fleetwood Mac world for 2014 would have been the release of 24KG. I'm willing to bet Stevie made more on the first night of the Fleetwood Mac tour than she'll ever see from IYD and 24KG combined. She HAD a lot more pull in the band from 1997-2013, but she overplayed her cards.
That is a somewhat valid point, but she is the only commercially relevant solo artist of the 5. Lindsey's records don't chart top 10 and hers do. I agree with the prior posts that the record labels will want no part of a Fleetwood Mac sans Stevie Nicks. After all the band doesn't have a label.. so who would sign them without her? the business is cruel, and Stevie seems to know how to work the execs better than LB.
I still think it would be ideal for them to sign with Interscope.. WB sucks in promoting their material!
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 02-28-2015, 12:53 AM
SteveMacD's Avatar
SteveMacD SteveMacD is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 9,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnystorms View Post
That is a somewhat valid point, but she is the only commercially relevant solo artist of the 5. Lindsey's records don't chart top 10 and hers do. I agree with the prior posts that the record labels will want no part of a Fleetwood Mac sans Stevie Nicks. After all the band doesn't have a label.. so who would sign them without her? the business is cruel, and Stevie seems to know how to work the execs better than LB.
I still think it would be ideal for them to sign with Interscope.. WB sucks in promoting their material!
Define commercially relevant. I think somebody who makes music videos and tours for two years behind an album that still only sells 125,000 is hardly commercially relevant. At least Lindsey understands the equation, the whole small machine thing, and uses his time outside of Fleetwood Mac to pursue creative interest that he wouldn't be able to pursue within Fleetwood Mac.

I think smaller indie labels would be drooling at the opportunity to release the Fleetwood Mac album, especially if Lindsey Buckingham and Christine McVie were on it. Personally, I would like to see them sign with Matador Records.
__________________
On and on it will always be, the rhythm, rhyme, and harmony.



THE Stephen Hopkins
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:20 AM
johnnystorms's Avatar
johnnystorms johnnystorms is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: new orleans
Posts: 760
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMacD View Post
Define commercially relevant. I think somebody who makes music videos and tours for two years behind an album that still only sells 125,000 is hardly commercially relevant. At least Lindsey understands the equation, the whole small machine thing, and uses his time outside of Fleetwood Mac to pursue creative interest that he wouldn't be able to pursue within Fleetwood Mac.

I think smaller indie labels would be drooling at the opportunity to release the Fleetwood Mac album, especially if Lindsey Buckingham and Christine McVie were on it. Personally, I would like to see them sign with Matador Records.
yeah, but a small label can't AFFORD to advance them... and if you remember in DR, John didn't even wanna put up 2 grand for a mix test. they'll only sign to a major, and no major will sign them without Stevie.
she IS commercially relevant, no other rocker in her 60s is close to her sales, and top 10 debuts matter. the right record company could have doubled that total
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2015, 01:48 AM
SteveMacD's Avatar
SteveMacD SteveMacD is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 9,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnystorms View Post
yeah, but a small label can't AFFORD to advance them...
What's to advance, though? They've already recorded the bulk of their work and with the money they're making on this tour, they don't need an advancement. The larger indie labels, like Matador, could very easily afford to release a band like Fleetwood Mac.

Quote:
they'll only sign to a major, and no major will sign them without Stevie.
I'm still not completely sold on that. I think some labels might be more inclined to sign MJCL over the full five if they knew the band would be fully committed to touring and working the new album as much as possible, and MJCL appear to be willing to make that commitment. That would be a pretty safe investment, especially if the album was already finished. With Stevie being so noncommittal at this point, I'd be more nervous about signing them with her, and I'd make sure legal had an iron clad contract as far as she was concerned.
__________________
On and on it will always be, the rhythm, rhyme, and harmony.



THE Stephen Hopkins
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Gimme You by Billy Burnette (Remastered CD, 1981, 2023) Fleetwood Mac picture

Gimme You by Billy Burnette (Remastered CD, 1981, 2023) Fleetwood Mac

$10.98



BILLY BURNETTE

BILLY BURNETTE "Cray Like Me" CD 2017 release STILL SEALED

$24.50



Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12

Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12" Columbia LP + Lyrics VG+

$6.00



BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+)

$5.00



Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue picture

Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue

$15.32




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved