The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2014, 04:19 AM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brickney723 View Post
I actually saw this new documentary tonight- In it Ken C talks about the Mirage era. He says at that time, both Lindsey AND John were "buzzing" around their respective exes with "old feelings" and it was upsetting to both women.. So yeah, it was obvious about Lindsey- but who knew about John? Not me.
It was at that time, before Mirage came out I believe, that Stevie said she and Lindsey could totally get back together. But she added that they would just break up all over again, so it wouldn't be practical.

Michele
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:46 AM
brickney723 brickney723 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
It was at that time, before Mirage came out I believe, that Stevie said she and Lindsey could totally get back together. But she added that they would just break up all over again, so it wouldn't be practical.

Michele
I'm convinced that was the reason for a lot of his anger towards her- being ok with acting like a couple, but not ever willing to be a couple again. Something he said in that Daily Mail article- we weren't even estranged, just not a couple- struck me as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2014, 01:55 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brickney723 View Post
I'm convinced that was the reason for a lot of his anger towards her- being ok with acting like a couple, but not ever willing to be a couple again. Something he said in that Daily Mail article- we weren't even estranged, just not a couple- struck me as well.
Oh in 1981-1982 I think she would have been willing to be a couple again. They seemed to have kind of a short-lived tenderness going on during that period, but he didn't leave his girlfriend.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2014, 02:04 PM
brickney723 brickney723 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
Oh in 1981-1982 I think she would have been willing to be a couple again. They seemed to have kind of a short-lived tenderness going on during that period, but he didn't leave his girlfriend.

Michele
I think he would have dropped CAH in a heartbeat if she would've been willing to really come back.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2014, 02:18 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brickney723 View Post
I think he would have dropped CAH in a heartbeat if she would've been willing to really come back.
I don't think he just wanted her back. They never seemed to break cleanly in the first place. They stopped being "husband and wife" but it seems they were still sleeping together occasionally. What he wanted was a household and monogamy and I don't think he ever thought he could get that from her during the height of their fame. Maybe he thought or hoped it in 1997 when he said she was like the girl he lived with all those years ago, but I don't think he thought that was a possibility in the eighties and I don't think he harbored any dream of getting back together with her. So, no I don't think he would have left his girlfriend for Stevie, not the way she was then. He didn't want just a liaison.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2014, 02:21 PM
brickney723 brickney723 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
I don't think he just wanted her back. They never seemed to break cleanly in the first place. They stopped being "husband and wife" but it seems they were still sleeping together occasionally. What he wanted was a household and monogamy and I don't think he ever thought he could get that from her during the height of their fame. Maybe he thought or hoped it in 1997 when he said she was like the girl he lived with all those years ago, but I don't think he thought that was a possibility in the eighties and I don't think he harbored any dream of getting back together with her. So, no I don't think he would have left his girlfriend for Stevie, not the way she was then. He didn't want just a liaison.

Michele
Exactly. I definitely think they were sleeping together off and on. I think he wanted a real, monogamous relationship with her- that she was not willing to have ever again really.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2014, 02:26 PM
brickney723 brickney723 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 228
Default

Though as far as harboring any dream of getting back together with her- I don't think he let go of that particular dream for literally decades.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Bekka Bramlett I GOT NEWS FOR YOU CD NEW & SEALED picture

Bekka Bramlett I GOT NEWS FOR YOU CD NEW & SEALED

$124.99



NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett picture

NEW - JOE COCKER - Take Me Home HTF UK CD Single feat. Bekka Bramlett

$7.69



Fleetwood Mac – Time CD 1995 Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Rock Warner Bros picture

Fleetwood Mac – Time CD 1995 Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Rock Warner Bros

$12.99



RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10 picture

RARE Fleetwood Mac Dave Mason Bekka Bramlett Era 93 Original WB Press Kit w 8x10

$69.99



Fleetwood Mac FULLY SIGNED On Q Newspaper JSA LOA McVie Mick Fleetwood Autograph picture

Fleetwood Mac FULLY SIGNED On Q Newspaper JSA LOA McVie Mick Fleetwood Autograph

$399.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved