The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-06-2013, 03:55 PM
louielouie2000's Avatar
louielouie2000 louielouie2000 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
I like the way Stevie pointed out that she hadn't done the song until the seventies after it was over.

Walter Egan performed the song even before Fleetwood Mac did and he said Lindsey told him to stop. Or he said Stevie told him she liked his version of the song, but since it was going to be on the next Mac album Lindsey put the kibosh on Egan continuing to do it.

Michele
I had no idea Walter ever performed the song, thanks for the heads up! Here's a version... obviously to me it just sounds totally wrong hearing anyone other than Fleetwood Mac perform Sisters.

__________________
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a382/louielouie2000/The_Plant_-_Sausalito_-_front_door_2.jpg
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 04-06-2013, 04:04 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
obviously to me it just sounds totally wrong hearing anyone other than Fleetwood Mac perform Sisters.
His is rather fast and sing-songy allowing the drama and mystery of the song to escape out like a bucket with a gaping hole.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2013, 04:41 PM
gypsy-sara's Avatar
gypsy-sara gypsy-sara is offline
Senior Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
I had no idea Walter ever performed the song, thanks for the heads up! Here's a version... obviously to me it just sounds totally wrong hearing anyone other than Fleetwood Mac perform Sisters.

I had no idea, too.
But I find his version very adorable and I really like it.
I have to say - I'm surprised about myself... I do love the studio version and the live version from 1982 so much, but yet i totally dig SOTM 2013 and also the Walter Egan-version.
It's obviously not that easy to mess up a perfect song.

Last edited by gypsy-sara; 04-06-2013 at 04:46 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2013, 05:17 PM
GoldDustBoy GoldDustBoy is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 315
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
I had no idea Walter ever performed the song, thanks for the heads up! Here's a version... obviously to me it just sounds totally wrong hearing anyone other than Fleetwood Mac perform Sisters.

I find this interesting because most of the time we get to hear a cover of the final product, but in this case we have both Fleetwood Mac's and Walter Egan's approach to the same demo.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2013, 05:36 PM
louielouie2000's Avatar
louielouie2000 louielouie2000 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,425
Default

I don't know about everyone else, but I'm just dying to hear if the song evolves any tonight, and throughout the rest of the tour for that matter. I'm still really amazed at how good Stevie's vocals were on the song, and how well the song works after all these years. It definitely needs some tweaking, but the issues it has are pretty piddley, in my opinion.
__________________
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a382/louielouie2000/The_Plant_-_Sausalito_-_front_door_2.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:04 PM
mylittledemon's Avatar
mylittledemon mylittledemon is offline
Moderator
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8,512
Default

^My only "gripe" is that it seemed to be lacking that eerie vibe that they had on the '82 tour. Also I think the song should've been another 2 minutes long... you know, stretch it out like they have been doing with Gold Dust Woman... give it more oompf by having a real long intro and outro.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:37 PM
NoLight77 NoLight77 is offline
Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 89
Default

I'm very glad they didn't do a piano intro to Sisters. It was rock and roll the whole time. Wish there was more drama to it, but glad they are doing it at all. On Not That Funny, it ended too soon. I much preferred the 82 version. All the "yeah yeah's" just were not the same as Lindsey and his 82 theatrics of the song. I just wish they would do more songs from their catalogue because other than Sisters, Not That Funny, Without You and Sad Angel, the rest have all been done before numerous times. I guess it is a greatest hits tour again. Am disappointed by that, but can't miss out, have to go.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:39 PM
NoLight77 NoLight77 is offline
Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mylittledemon View Post
^My only "gripe" is that it seemed to be lacking that eerie vibe that they had on the '82 tour. Also I think the song should've been another 2 minutes long... you know, stretch it out like they have been doing with Gold Dust Woman... give it more oompf by having a real long intro and outro.

Totally agree. Like on Rhiannon from days of old when they played a little while and then Stevie starts screaming. Gives more drama.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2013, 09:22 PM
CADreaming's Avatar
CADreaming CADreaming is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mylittledemon View Post
^My only "gripe" is that it seemed to be lacking that eerie vibe that they had on the '82 tour. Also I think the song should've been another 2 minutes long... you know, stretch it out like they have been doing with Gold Dust Woman... give it more oompf by having a real long intro and outro.
I'm with you on this too.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-07-2013, 12:26 PM
Dodfather's Avatar
Dodfather Dodfather is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 3,117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mylittledemon View Post
^My only "gripe" is that it seemed to be lacking that eerie vibe that they had on the '82 tour. Also I think the song should've been another 2 minutes long... you know, stretch it out like they have been doing with Gold Dust Woman... give it more oompf by having a real long intro and outro.
Hear hear! I'd love to see them make a real "event" of this song in the set.
__________________
I'll follow you down until the sound of my voice will haunt you...you'll never get away from the sound of the woman that loves you...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-07-2013, 12:33 PM
shackin'up's Avatar
shackin'up shackin'up is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: bemmel/lowlands
Posts: 6,912
Default

After 90 seconds I clicked it away. I think it's too much of a rebuilt to get through. I can't stand the around flying "sisters", and Mick just doesn't drive it the way he has to. I miss the hooky accents he adds on the original and the old liveversions. But I totally miss the guitar-energy. I think it's a real bore.
__________________
..........................................................................................





Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-06-2013, 08:21 PM
Johnny Stew's Avatar
Johnny Stew Johnny Stew is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 12,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by louielouie2000 View Post
I don't know about everyone else, but I'm just dying to hear if the song evolves any tonight, and throughout the rest of the tour for that matter. I'm still really amazed at how good Stevie's vocals were on the song, and how well the song works after all these years. It definitely needs some tweaking, but the issues it has are pretty piddley, in my opinion.
I agree, Louie, and I definitely think it will get better as the tour progresses. Stevie's mature voice sounded really fantastic on it -- they just need to build on the song's atmosphere and inherent eeriness (like Brandon said).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-06-2013, 09:16 PM
Christopher's Avatar
Christopher Christopher is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,076
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Stew View Post
I agree, Louie, and I definitely think it will get better as the tour progresses. Stevie's mature voice sounded really fantastic on it -- they just need to build on the song's atmosphere and inherent eeriness (like Brandon said).
Stevie's voice mature voice sounds great on it as I suspected. Actually I'm kinda diggin that they are playing it pretty close to the actual Tusk studio recording (w/ minor vocal modifications) than the 8 minute blistering "Tusk" & "Mirage" tour versions which would be completley unrealistic & unachievable energy and vocal-wise.

"Sisters" is probably more strange & wierd in 2013 than ever before for the casual Fleetwood Mac concert going fan, and I love it & hope it freaks peeps out...in a good way
Stevie hasn't written & recorded a song so eerie and freaky, well, since Sisterzzzzzzzzzzz
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Gimme You by Billy Burnette (Remastered CD, 1981, 2023) Fleetwood Mac picture

Gimme You by Billy Burnette (Remastered CD, 1981, 2023) Fleetwood Mac

$10.98



BILLY BURNETTE

BILLY BURNETTE "Cray Like Me" CD 2017 release STILL SEALED

$24.50



Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12

Billy Burnette - Self-Titled LP - 1980 1st Pressing 12" Columbia LP + Lyrics VG+

$6.00



BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+) picture

BILLY BURNETTE - GIMME YOU - 1981 COLUMBIA RECORDS VINYL ALBUM - (VG/VG+)

$5.00



Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue picture

Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue

$15.32




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved