Deleted posts on Mick's board

[wetcamelfood]

Not to start yet another bitching thread on Mick and his board or anything, and, instead of being annoyed like I probably should be, I find this kind of comical actually, but I just went to Mick's board for the first time in a while and I was amazed to see that my profile there SAYS I have about 30 or so posts but when I searched on them (to see if I got answers to my posts (which I knew I wouldn't but y'know how it is, out of curiosity etc.) there was only ONE post there of mine that seems to have survived the onslaught of deleting that I understand is going on there which I find completely unreal.

Though I did find it a plastic place early on, I never really had posted anything negative there, I simply just didn't go back there too often and when I did I just looked at what was being posted. The only stuff I ever did post there was on completely innocent things like "which song on (this) album did Mick play on? (etc.)" and Knight did say early on something to the effect that "someone as devoted as me deserved an answer every once in a while (etc.)". Well, I guess it's safe for me to assume I will not only NOT get answers to those questions I had asked there but that the innocent nature of my questions were considered too controversial or something. I can't imagine why though since in many of those threads in which I had asked my questions, no one else had said anything in them and I doubt very much that in my absence anyone would have felt as though they needed to start the (apparently) "hateful, mean spirited" posts in those particular posts (meaning they would have to delete them for "that purpose"). Also, I know they said they just generally delete old threads that don't get answered there etc. (I suppose to just clear space or whatever bizarre reason) but because I was directing those questions to Knight (as I had the hunch he wouldn't answer the identical questions I had sent him in PM's/E mails which turned out to be right) that they would stand since he said he was going to be the one to "give me an answer once in a while" as he had said and if there was "so much negativity there" then I would have thought they would have wanted to hang on to the few things there that were not "causing any problems" but I guess not.

Well, whatever, I just thought I'd share the "joke" with you all.

John