Washington Post on Tusk: Not So Good

[michelej1]

I get the feeling he's trying to resist having the seventies defined as Fleetwood Mac or mocking the fact that anything they do is greeted with historical importance, just because of the success of Rumours. By leaving them until the last half of his review, I think he's trying to minimize their musical importance in the great schemes of other things that shaped American culture, Brando, James Dean, the Beatles, etc. By comparison, Fleetwood Mac mean nothing, according to him.

Michele